AuroraMiddleware/gtk2
1
0
Fork 0
forked from AuroraMiddleware/gtk
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

docs: Escape some xml tags

Browse Source 
When mentioning xml tags in markdown, we must write
them as `<foo>`, or they will come out mangled.
This commit is contained in:
Matthias Clasen 2021-06-04 08:06:18 -04:00
parent c4cbd6ec1b
commit b6cd97be1e
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
docs/reference/gtk/migrating-3to4.md
View File

@ -740,7 +740,7 @@ The abstract base class `GtkBin` for single-child containers has been
removed. The former subclasses are now derived directly from `GtkWidget`,
and have a "child" property for their child widget. To add a child, use
the setter for the "child" property (e.g. [method@Gtk.Frame.set_child]) instead
of `gtk_container_add()`. Adding a child in a ui file with <child> still works.
of `gtk_container_add()`. Adding a child in a ui file with `<child>` still works.
The affected classes are:
@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ expand flags) and [vfunc@Gtk.Widget.get_request_mode] (if you want your
container to support height-for-width).
You may also want to implement the [iface@Gtk.Buildable] interface, to support
adding children with <child> in ui files.
adding children with `<child>` in ui files.
### Adapt to GtkContainer removal
@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ and have class-specific add() and remove() functions.
The most noticeable change is the use of [method@Gtk.Box.append] or [method@Gtk.Box.prepend]
instead of `gtk_container_add()` for adding children to `GtkBox`, and the change
to use container-specific remove functions, such as [method@Gtk.Stack.remove] instead
of `gtk_container_remove()`. Adding a child in a ui file with <child> still works.
of `gtk_container_remove()`. Adding a child in a ui file with `<child>` still works.
The affected classes are: