Try to do a better job of keeping example content
from being too wide. It is often rendered as <pre>
text so the only time we can wrap it is in the source.
It is best to full break lines at all punctuation and
to try to keep the width under 70 chars or so.
Stop trying to deal with "theoretical possibilities".
We can't possibly continue to be a faithful GActionGroup implementation
across dispose because dispose has a side effect of removing everyone's
signal handlers.
The code that we ran after the dispose chainup to do all of the fancy
signal emulation was therefore dead. The test that aimed to verify this
was buggy itself due to an uninitialised variable, so really, it never
worked at all.
We keep the re-ordering of the chainup from the original commit to avoid having
trouble with GtkActionMuxer and keep the checks in place that will prevent an
outright segfault in the case that someone else tries to use the interface
post-dispose.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722189
GtkApplicationWindow frees its internal action group on dispose for the
usual reasons: to avoid the possibility of reference cycles caused by
actions referring back to the window again.
Unfortunately, if it happens to be inside of a GtkActionMuxer at the
time that it is disposed, it will (eventually) be removed from the muxer
after it has been disposed. Removing an action group from a muxer
involves a call to g_action_group_list_actions() which will crash
because the internal action group to which we normally delegate the call
has been freed.
A future patch that reworks the quartz menu code will introduce a use of
GtkActionMuxer in a way that causes exactly this problem.
We can guard against the problem in a number of ways.
First, we can avoid the entire situation by ensuring that we are removed
from the muxer before we destroy the action group. To this end, we
delay destruction of the action group until after the chain-up to the
dispose of GtkWindow (which is where the window is removed from the
GtkApplication).
Secondly, we can add checks to each of our GActionGroup and GActionMap
implementation functions to check that the internal action group is
still alive before we attempt to delegate to it.
We have to be careful, though: because our _list_actions() call will
suddenly be returning an empty list, people watching the group from
outside will have expected to see "action-removed" calls for the
now-missing items. Make sure we send those. but only if someone is
watching.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710351
gtkapplication.c has turned into a bit of an #ifdef mess over time, and
many of the current checks are incorrect. As an example, if you build
Gtk for wayland, and exclude the X11 backend, much of the functionality
required by wayland (such as exporting menu models) will be disabled.
Solve that by introducing a backend mechanism to GtkApplication (named
GtkApplicationImpl) similar to the one in GApplication. Add backends
for Wayland, X11 and Quartz, with X11 and Wayland sharing a common
'DBus' superclass.
GtkApplicationImpl
|
/--------------+-------------------\
| |
GtkApplicationImplDBus GtkApplicationImplQuartz
|
/-----------+-----------------\
| |
GtkApplicationImplX11 GtkApplicationImplWayland
GtkApplicationImpl itself is essentially a bunch of vfuncs that serve as
hooks for various things that the platform-specific backends may be
interested in doing (startup, shutdown, managing windows, inhibit, etc.)
With this change, all platform specific code has been removed from
gtkapplication.c and gtkapplicationwindow.c (both of which are now free
of #ifdefs, except for a UNIX-specific use of GDesktopAppInfo in
gtkapplicationwindow.c).
Additionally, because of the movement of the property-setting code out
of GtkApplicationWindow, the _GTK_APPLICATION_ID properties (and
friends) will be set on non-GtkApplicationWindows, such as dialogs.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720550
When the menubar inserted by GtkApplicationWindow is the widest
widget in a csd window, its allocation gets cut short. Fix this
by taking the decoration size into account while calculating
the size request (it is implicitly taken into account in the
size allocation phase by _gtk_window_set_allocation).
Do the menubutton for app menu fallback ourselves in GtkWindow
for the csd, non-custom titlebar case. This fits better with
the way we handle other title buttons. Themes have control
over the placement of this button by placing menu in the
decoration-button-layout style property.
Rework how accels are handled on GtkApplicationWindow.
Instead of having GtkApplication fill the GtkAccelMap which is then used
by GtkApplicationWindow to create a GtkAccelGroup filled with closures
that is then associated with the window, do it directly.
GtkApplication now keeps a list of accels and their actions.
Accelerators on a GtkApplicationWindow ask GtkApplication to execute the
appropriate action.
This saves a fair bit of complexity and memory use (due to not having to
create all those closures and accelmap entries). The new approach also
supports multiple accels per action (although there is not yet a public
API for it).
This patch (and the ones before) Reviewed and ACK'd by Matthias Clasen.
If the compositor supports the gtk-shell interface, use it to
export the application ID, dbus name and paths that can be used
for the application menu.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707129
GtkApplicationWindow would only update its list of captured accels
when realizing the window. This meant that keyboard shortcuts added
after the window was realised (for example, added by plugins) would
be non-functional.
Solve this by updating our accels every time the accel map changes,
not only when realizing the window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700079
Instead of reparenting the content, use input-only windows to
set cursors and capture clicks on the window frame. This avoids
some of the problems that were introduced by content_window, such
as black flashes and non-working opacity.
Update the documentation and users of this function to handle
the future case that that we have some internal decorations to the window and
useable allocation is thus smaller.
By having a separate out parameter there is no need to have an in/out function
and allows for greater robustness.
The current implementation simply returns the allocation provided.
Make the main (and only) entry-point to gtkmodelmenu.c the now-public
gtk_menu_shell_bind_model().
Move the convenience constructors (gtk_menu_new_from_model() and
gtk_menu_bar_new_from_model()) to their proper files.
Remove the private header file.
Simplify the code a bit by making the initial populate part of the
bind() call.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682831
Add an API to GtkAccelLabel for hardcoding the accel key to be displayed
(ie: allowing us to bypass the GtkAccelGroup lookup).
Use that from the GMenuModel-based GtkMenu construction code instead of
passing around the accel group.
This makes accel labels work in bloatpad again.
This patch effectively removes any hope of automatic runtime accel
changes in GMenuModel-based menus without additional application
support but it leaves the door open for this to be supported again in
the future (if we decide that it's important).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683738
There are no remaining users of the GActionMuxer in GtkApplicationWindow
because they've all been ported over to using the one on GtkWidget (via
GtkActionHelper, for the most part).
There are no remaining users of the GtkApplicationWindow API to create
GSimpleActionObserver or to get the GActionObservable (ie: muxer) for
the appwindow. Drop those APIs.
Drop the explicit passing of GActionGroup into the GtkMenu(Bar)
constructors and operate from the action context instead.
With GtkMenuItem implementing GtkActionable, this turns out to be pretty
easy (and most of the code can be removed from GtkModelMenuItem,
including the GActionObserver implementation).
Each GtkWindow with an associated GtkApplication should add this as
"app" to its action context. Each GtkApplicationWindow is its own
GActionGroup, and it should add itself to itself with the prefix "win".
There is now some duplication here because we have the new GActionMuxer
hierarchy managed by GtkWidget, but GtkApplicationWindow still carries
its own muxer. The redundancy will be removed in a future patch.
GApplication now makes the session bus and object path available as a
public API on the application instance. Use that instead of trying to
guess values for ourselves.
This causes this version of Gtk+ to depend on GLib 2.32.2, so bumping
version dependency accordingly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671249
We currently have a couple of cases where GtkApplication assumes that
the session bus will be non-NULL causing critical error output or (in
the case of trying to publish menus) an infinite loop.
Three fixes:
- if the session bus is NULL due to not having registered the
GtkApplication yet then give a g_critical on the entry point to the
menu setters instead of going into an infinite loop. Document this.
- check for NULL session bus even when calling the menu setters at the
right time in order to prevent the infinite loop for
non-programer-error cases (ie: because we had trouble connecting to
the session bus)
- check for NULL session bus when publishing the X11 properties on the
GtkApplicationWindow and skip publishing them if we're not on the bus
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671249
Try to fetch the name from the application desktop file for the
fallback menu if possible, instead of forcing applications to use
g_set_application_name or hardcoding "Application".
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673882
In particular gtksettings.h and gtkstylecontext.h needed to be included
in lots of places now.
Also, I order the includes alphabetically in a bunch of headers.
