And use it to handle kinetic scrolling in the GtkScrolledWindow.
However, dropping the delta check causes the X11-based kinetic
scroll to break since we don't have the stop event here. Correct handling of
xf86-input-libinput-based scroll events is still being discussed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756729
This adds support for the new wl_pointer events available in v5.
The wl_pointer.axis_source events can be ignored for the purposes here, the
main reason they exist is so that the combination of axis_source=finger and
axis_stop triggers kinetic scrolling. We don't need to care about the source,
axis_stop is enough for us to tell us when we're scrolling.
The wl_pointer.frame events group events together and is intended as a
mechanism to coalesce events together. This for example allows us to now
send a single GTK scroll event for a diagonal scroll. Previously, the two
wl_pointer.axis events had to be handled separately.
The wl_pointer.axis_discrete event sends mouse wheel clicks where
appropriate, and is translated into up/down/left/right scroll events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756729
When a cursor is specified in gdk_seat_grab(), the cursor is reverted as
soon as the pointer enters or leaves another window.
To avoid this issue, store the grab cursor separately, so we force-apply
it in ::set_window_cursor(). Also, unset early the seat info from the
window on gdk_seat_ungrab(), so the next time switch_to_pointer_grab()
happens we end up picking the cursor set for the window underneath the
pointer window.
Based on a patch by Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760213
We destroy the widget that is wrapped around the drag window
when the object data on the drag context gets cleared. Destroying
the window before that happens leads to unpleasantries. E.g. we may
try to access the frame clock, which doesn't exist anymore, and
things go downhill from there. So, keep the window alive for
a little longer.
X11 has the notions of "transient for group", and while it's an ICCCM
violation, it's commonly used and documented that a window manager
would treat a window with transient_for set to None to transient for all
windows of its group.
gtk uses this when an application sets a dialog type window but does not
specify an explicit transient.
While this works on X11, there is no such thing as groups in Wayland and
the closest equivalent which is set_parent() in xdg-shell takes only one
parent. This is what is used for modal dialogs.
To get something similar in behavior to what is available on X11, a
solution is to update the parent() of the dialogs without transient when
the active surface changes.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759161
Quite a few applications use GTK_WINDOW_POPUP to create various
temporary windows and place then on screen. That works fine on X11 but
on Wayland there is no global coordinate system for regular surfaces.
If the application is using a gdk temp window and set a parent with
gtk_window_transient_for(), the gdk wayland backend has all it needs to
create a subsurface that can be placed at will by the application.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759738
Always returning a left_ptr if we can't find anything better
broke firefox application-specific fallback for missing cursors.
Keep that working by only doing the fallback for the CSS cursor
names, not for things like hashes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760141
In most places, we can do with the pointer/keyboard of the default seat
instead of the client pointer. We can also remove some code from
gdk_input_init() because we know for sure there's no floating devices to
care about here.
Gdk Wayland backend walks up the transient windows tree, but does not
check for cycles when doing so.
As a result, if two or more windows are transient to each other, the
Wayland gdk backend will enter an infinite loop.
While this is clearly a bug in the application, gtk+/gdk should be more
robust and handle such errors more gracefully.
To avoid looping infinitely at various point in the code, check for a
possible loop when setting the transient relationship and deny the
request to set a window transient for another if that would create a
loop.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759299
We no longer need a grabbed seat, instead we'll just use the default
seat if this happens, not without first warning and recommending
gdk_seat_grab() for the operation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759309
This allows GDK to unset the grab itself. Also, make sure we unset
the "pointer emulating" touch on the device if this is the
pointer emulating sequence.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759309
GdkWaylandDeviceData conceptually gathers the data that belongs to
a seat, so it's been renamed (although the old typedef stays, plenty
of refactoring is due here...).
The methods in GdkSeatClass have also been implemented, the most
remarkable is ::grab, which ensures the grab is performed on all
the relevant "master" devices.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759309
On some systems, the gtk settings are not used properly for wayland.
Indeed, g_settings_schema_source_get_default is used, and as the docs says it,
"all lookups performed against the default source should probably be done
recursively.".
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759409
Add a variant of gdk_drag_begin that takes the start position
in addition to the device. All backend implementation have been
updated to accept (and ignore) the new arguments.
Subsequent commits will make use of the data in some backends.
In Wayland, the hotspot of a DND icon is set using the buffer offset in
wl_buffer.attach. To implement this, add a private API to cause the
next wl_surface.attach to offset the new buffer with a given offset.
Setting a DND icon hotspot sets this offset while also queuing a redraw
of the window to trigger the wl_surface.attach.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759168
In Wayland, the hotspot of a DND icon is set using the buffer offset in
wl_buffer.attach. To implement this, add a private API to cause the
next wl_surface.attach to offset the new buffer with a given offset.
Setting a DND icon hotspot sets this offset while also queuing a redraw
of the window to trigger the wl_surface.attach.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759168
gdk-wayland backend would not re-configure a surface when its size and
scale match the known size and scale.
But there might be a pending xdg_surface_configure() that would revert
this change so we should re-configure even if the currently known
size/scale match, otherwise we may end up with a wrong size after the
xdg_surface_configure() is received.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758901
If we "release" the button first, the drag will be eventually cancelled,
we must first signal GDK_DROP_FINISHED, and then release the button so
the success status prevails.
It doesn't make a lot of sense to have this stored as data offer data,
rather together with the source_targets array, which is what we're
poking here in the end.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758713
Dissociate ownership from our maintenance of wl_data_source objects.
The only place where ownership must be updated together is
data_source.cancelled, for the other places GDK should take care of
setting up the right ownership, even if at a different order than
we'd expect here.
This fixes GTK+ apps on wayland being locally confused about the
current selection ownership. Because gtk_selection_add_targets()
results in a wl_data_source being created, and ownership being
updated right away, early callers of this will change the ownership
even if the widget it's being called on didn't explicitly request
the selection ownership yet.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758660
Instead of having our own copy of the pointer gestures XML file, use
the one installed by wayland-protocols.
Since pointer gestures is an unstable protocol, it went through the
unstable protocol naming convention changes, which is reflected in this
commit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758634
After the grab is finished, we would expect an enter event, and
GDK updating internally the cursor for that window and device.
This means there is no need at all to store it separately in the
backend.
As a side effect, animated cursors are now also possible on grab
icons.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735847
Other backends take care of the cairo surface destruction in
GdkWindow::destroy. We must do the same here, or the cairo_surface
and its corresponding wl_buffer are left dangling.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747295
If the buffer of a cursor is NULL, for example if its an empty cursor,
just set the cursor surface to NULL as well. Not doing this we'll use
uninitialized hotspot coordinates, dimensions and scales.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758025
This GdkDragContext should be created even if we don't have pointer
capabilities. Make it created on add_seat(), and only set the device
on wl_seat.capabilities, so it can be set to either master pointer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741066
We use the high-level gdk_device_get_window_at_position() to figure
out the window, although this one actually tries to find out the
current window under the device coordinates, which might well fall
outside the window, so NULL is returned in those cases.
Fix this by using the lower level _gdk_device_window_at_position()
that will return the toplevel without further lookups, so is more
desirable here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758250
Now that we have multiple master pointers, this call may pick the wrong one.
Instead, pick the GdkWaylandDeviceData from the first device, and pick the
master pointer from there.
The common GDK code accounts for "pointer emulating" touch sequences to be
synchronized with the pointer position by the windowing system.
However on Wayland pointer and touch are completely independent, the backend
attempts to implement pointer emulation, but doesn't account for the
possible crossing events happening when the user switches from pointer to
touch or the opposite.
In order to fix this, and to ensure we don't have to interact with the
master pointer (which backs the wl_pointer), separate the touch interface
to have its own master pointer, and ensure crossing events are emitted on
it, so the picture of an "emulated pointer" is complete above the backend.
Inspired in a former patch by Jonny Lamb <jonnylamb@gnome.org>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750845
We were using that range for the extra buttons after left/right/middle,
while this is harmless for clients not handling extra buttons (we
used to translate those button events into scroll events in x11 anyway)
this will be unexpected for clients that do handle additional mouse
buttons themselves (eg. back/forward buttons present in some mice).
In order to remain compatible with X11, those need to be assigned from
button 8 onwards.
Also, include input.h, and stop using magic numbers here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758072
Make sure the wayland backend sets a new geometry when the client
resizes itself, otherwise the compositor won't be notified and may
revert to the old size on state changes.
Thanks to Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net> who pointed out the
problem in gtk+.
bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755051
