There are currently three widget that implement such a property, and
there are other widgets for which the behavior can make sense. It
seems like a good time to add the property to GtkWidget itself so
subclasses can choose to respect it without adding their own property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757269
This is so widgets can queue a rerun of their allocation logic, but
without triggering resizes everywhere.
For now, it just calls gtk_widget_queue_resize().
This allows a widget to override global font_options, such as hinting and
subpixel order. The widget's PangoContext is updated when this is set.
Some update code from gtk_widget_update_pango_context was moved to
update_pango_context so that gtk_widget_update_pango_context runs it.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751677
These functions, while added for use by the GTK inspector, are generally
useful to applications that need to resolve what action groups are
available to a particular GtkWidget.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741386
And handle the fact that drawing bounds are now handled by this API and
the corresponding gtk_widget_get_clip().
Also add _gtk_widget_supports_clip() function to check if a widget has
been ported to the new world.
The propagation phase property/methods in GtkEventController are gone,
This is now set directly on the GtkWidget add/remove controller API,
which has been made private.
The only public bit now are the new functions gtk_gesture_attach() and
gtk_gesture_detach() that will use the private API underneath.
All callers have been updated.
Listen for notify::sequence-state-changed on the controller, so the
only way to manipulate a sequence state are gtk_gesture_set_sequence_state()
and gtk_gesture_set_state().
Also, make use of gesture groups, so the sequence state is set at once
on all gestures pertaining to a single group. Within a widget, if a sequence
is claimed on one group, it is made to be denied on every other group.
GtkEventController may be certainly useful to keep event
handling self-contained in other places than gestures, but
the current widget API is highly related to gestures, so
just using GtkGesture as the argument there will be quite
more convenient. The other places where GtkEventController
make sense as a base object will better provide their own
hooks.
A controller can be optionally hooked on the capture or the bubble
phase, so the controller will automatically receive and handle events
as they arrive without further interaction.
The root window is a fairly X-centric concept, and it
really has no place in the GtkWidget API. Plus, this
is a rarely-used one-line convenience function with
poor documentation.
Add margin-{start,end} and gtk_widget_{get,set}_margin_{start,end}
and drop margin-{left,right} and gtk_widget_{get,set}_margin_{left,right}.
margin-{start,end} handle right also in RTL.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710238
We rename the gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal}
macros by appending a _private to their name. Otherwise, it
would be too magic to pass the 'public' names as arguments,
but affect a member of the Private struct. At the same time,
Add two new macros with the old names,
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal} that operate
on members of the instance struct.
The macros and functions are inconsistently named, and are not tied to
the "template" concept - to the point that it seems plausible to use
them without setting the template.
The new naming scheme is as follows:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_full
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback_full
With the convenience macros:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_internal
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700898https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700896
Using an offset from the struct means you can have children in
both the public and private (via G_PRIVATE_OFFSET) parts of the
instance. It also matches the new private macros nicer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702563
Signed-off-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@gnome.org>
gtk_widget_preferred_size() is only useful if you want to quickly port a
widget from GTK2 sizing code to GTK3 but does not properly work with
height-for-width as used in GTK. So we don't want to encourage people to
use it. In particular we want people to convert to height-for-width
before adding baseline support to their widgets.
Since widgets now cache drawn state we allow them to override
queue_draw_region to detect when some region of the widget
should be redrawn. For instance, if a widget draws the
background color in a pixel cache we will need to invalidate
that when the style context changes which queues a repaint.
This modifies the size machinery in order to allow baseline support.
We add a new widget vfunc get_preferred_height_and_baseline_for_width
which queries the normal height_for_width (or non-for-width if width
is -1) and additionally returns optional (-1 means "no baseline")
baselines for the minimal and natural heights.
We also add a new gtk_widget_size_allocate_with_baseline() which
baseline-aware containers can use to allocate children with a specific
baseline, either one inherited from the parent, or one introduced due
to requested baseline alignment in the container
itself. size_allocate_with_baseline() works just like a normal size
allocation, except the baseline gets recorded so that the child can
access it via gtk_widget_get_allocated_baseline() when it aligns
itself.
There are also adjust_baseline_request/allocation similar to the
allocation adjustment, and we extend the size request cache to also
store the baselines.
Setting this means baseline aware containers should align the widget
according to the baseline. For other containers this behaves like
FILL.
In order to not suprise old code with a new enum value we always
return _FILL for _BASELINE unless you specifically request it via
gtk_widget_get_valign_with_baseline().
