We already know that a widget will have literally 1 node, not more.
Avoid doing the GtkSnapshot state stack dance and just append a new
transform node instead.
Seems to give me around 400 more icons in the fishbowl
It feels slightly wrong to have GtkOrientable operate on widgets, but at
least what happens when an orientable widget changes orientation should
be part of GtkWidget.
This will allow to add more state changes without accessing widget state
from the outside of gtkwidget.c.
We expect widgets to use their own derived GtkWidgetAccessible type,
these days, and given that we hard code the default accessible type of a
GtkWidget to GtkWidgetAccessible, and that we enforce the dependency of
the type passed to gtk_widget_class_set_accessible_type(), the registry
code path is clearly unused.
The tooltip handling in GtkWidget is "special":
- the string is stored inside the qdata instead of the private
instance data
- the accessors call g_object_set() and g_object_get(), and the
logic is all inside the property implementation, instead of
being the other way around
- the getters return a copy of the string
- the setters don't really notify all the involved properties
The GtkWidgetAccessible uses the (escaped) tooltip text as a source for
the accessible object description, which means it has to store the
tooltip inside the object qdata, and update its copy at construction and
property notification time.
We can simplify this whole circus by making the tooltip properties (text
and markup) more idiomatic:
- notify all side-effect properties
- return a constant string from the getter
- if tooltip-text is set:
- store the text as is
- escape the markup and store it separately for the markup getter
- if tooltip-markup is set:
- store the markup as is
- parse the markup and store it separately for the text getter
The part of the testtooltips interactive test that checks that the
getters are doing the right thing is now part of the gtk testsuite, so
we ensure we don't regress in behaviour.
If you add a widget to a parent, this will invalidate the css nodes
for parent/siblings. Afterwards, if the parent is mapped, we will
realize the new child. This calls gtk_widget_update_alpha() which
needs the css opacity, so it revalidates the css.
Thus, for each widget_add (while visible) will trigger a full
revalidation of each sibling. If you add N children to a parent that
leads to O(N^2) revalidations.
To demo this I changed gtk-demo to always double the count
(independent of the fps) and print the time it took. Here is the
results (after a bit):
Setting fishbowl count=256 took 3,4 msec
Setting fishbowl count=512 took 10,1 msec
Setting fishbowl count=1024 took 34,1 msec
Setting fishbowl count=2048 took 126,3 msec
Setting fishbowl count=4096 took 480,3 msec
Setting fishbowl count=8192 took 1892,7 msec
Setting fishbowl count=16384 took 7751,0 msec
Setting fishbowl count=32768 took 38097,7 msec
Setting fishbowl count=65536 took 191987,7 msec
To fix this we drop gtk_widget_update_alpha() and just
calculate it when needed (which is only in a single place).
It was really only necessary because we previously set
the alpha on the surface.
With this fix the above becomes:
Setting fishbowl count=256 took 1,0 msec
Setting fishbowl count=512 took 1,9 msec
Setting fishbowl count=1024 took 3,7 msec
Setting fishbowl count=2048 took 7,4 msec
Setting fishbowl count=4096 took 18,1 msec
Setting fishbowl count=8192 took 31,0 msec
Setting fishbowl count=16384 took 66,3 msec
Setting fishbowl count=32768 took 126,7 msec
Setting fishbowl count=65536 took 244,6 msec
Setting fishbowl count=131072 took 492,2 msec
Setting fishbowl count=262144 took 984,3 msec
We require a C compiler supporting C99 now. The main purpose of
these fallbacks was for MSVC. From what I can see this is now all supported
by MSVC 2015+ anyway.
The only other change this includes is to replace isnanf() with the
(type infering) C99 isnan() macro, because MSVC doesn't provide isnanf().
It's private, no APIs, we don't talk about it. But we will start using
it very soon, so we can do size request caching in columns and avoid
sizegroups...
If you run weston with the headless backend, you get a Wayland
display with no seat, which is just fine by the protocol.
gdk_display_get_default_seat() returns NULL in this case. Various
widgets assume that we always have a seat with a keyboard and a
pointer, since that is what X guarantees. Make things survive
without that, so we can run the testsuite under a headless
Wayland compositor.
Add back a property that determines whether an individual
widget will accept focus or not. :can-focus prevents the
focus from ever entering the entire widget hierarchy
below a widget, and :focusable just determines if grabbing
the focus to the widget itself will succeed.
See #2686
This signal is mainly used for bad things, and we
don't want to emit signals during layout if we can
avoid it.
If you are subclassing, you should either use a
layout manager or override the size_allocate vfunc.
If you are using a GtkDrawingArea or GtkGLArea,
use their ::resize signals to learn about size
changes.
Fixes: #2705
The a11y machinery is using signal subscription to get notified of size
changes and notify listeners in turn. This is suboptimal for a couple of
reasons:
- if something connects to the GtkWidget::size-allocate signal we need
to emit it; currently, we have an optimization in place that will
skip the signal emission if there are no handlers, and it would be
nice to go through the fast path
- the accessibility implementation is part of GTK, and should not go
through additional hoops like any out-of-tree API consumer
This is either no chagne because we know for a fact that the returned
value is a GtkNative - after all thats's the type we pass to
gtk_widget_get_ancestor().
Or it is a bug fix since casting NULL to a GtkNative using GTK_NATIVE()
is not going to work, but the API contract of gtk_widget_get_native()
explicitly allows a NULL return value.
We were having a problem where property actions were
not getting state updates because prop_actions_connect
was triggered from some instance_init function while
the widget class is not in place yet.
Delay that call until the widget is fully constructed,
so we can guarantee that we are dealing with the
correct class private struct, and see all class actions.
We already dropped this invariant in gtk_widget_verify_invariants()
because it was not true in all cases. Also, it is not really useful
these days as we extended what it means to be a "child" to also
include widgets in different toplevels.
For example, a popup in a popup button need not be realized just
because the button is in a realized window. The main invariants
we want are:
* Parent is realized before child
* Widget is realized before it is mapped
This sounds like its not a huge deal, but in fact it is a massive win
for things like menus, because when we go between menus in a menubar
each switch between two open menus involves a lot of intermingled
crossing events to different surfaces and for each of these the
tooltip window of the toplevel gets assigned to the new surface. This
shouldn't be a huge deal, as the tooltip window is not even visible,
but due to the realized invariant it get re-realized each time it gets
re-assigned.
This gives us a hook to walk the widget tree whenever a global
setting changes and do per-widget invalidations. This will
replace gtk_style_context_reset_widgets().
This was only living in gtkcontainer.c for historic
reasons. Move it closer to where it belongs, and
rename it from 'idle' to 'layout', since it is
really about the layout phase of the frame clock,
nowadays.
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
Make widgets can-focus by default, and change the semantics
of can-focus to be recursive . If it is set to FALSE, focus
can not enter the widget or its descendents at all anymore.
This commit temporarily breaks focus behavior of widgets
that did not expect to receive focus.
The only place where this should be set is when making
a widget the focus-widget of a window. We still keep
the property around in readonly form, since there are
a few places where we rely on property notification
for it.
This property doesn't carry any new information compared
to GtkWindow:focus-widget. We still keep the gtk_widget_is_focus
getter, as a convenient shortcut.
People should use shortcut controllers instead (global, capture).
A side effect of this is that GtkAccelLabel now lost its method to
magically look up accelerators to display. Somebody needs to add that
back later.
When creating shortcuts, there almost always are a trigger and an action
available for use. So make gtk_shortcut_new() take those as arguments.
Also add gtk_shortcut_new_with_arguments() so people can easily pass
those in, too.
Similar to GtkShortcutTrigger, GtkShortCutAction provides all the
different ways to activate a shortcut.
So far, these different ways are supported:
- do nothing
- Call a user-provided callback
- Call gtk_widget_activate()
- Call gtk_widget_mnemonic_activate()
- Emit an action signal
- Activate an action from the widget's action muxer
It's an outdated technology now that everybody is using GActionGroups.
If somebody wanted to support changeable shortcuts, they'd need to
reintroduce it in another way.
This adds an interface for taking care of shortcut controllers with
managed scope.
Only GtkWindow currently implements this interface, so we need to ensure
that we check if any top-level widget we reach is a shortcuts manager
before we call into it.
Allow setting the scope for a controller. The scope determines at what
point in event propagation the shortcuts will be activated.
Local scope is the usual activation, global scope means that the root
widget activates the shortcuts - ie they are activated at the very
start of event propagation (for global capture events) or the very end
(for global bubble events).
Managed scope so far is unimplemented.
This is supposed to be used to replace accelerators and mnemonics.
