There was a corner case where the changed signal was not emitted.
If rows were built like this:
1 (not selected)
+ 2 (selected)
+ 3 (not selected)
And row 1 was removed, no signal would be emitted.
I like it when writing tests actually finds bugs that have been around
since 2003 - introduced by 4a03ea2334
actually. :)
We get certain cases, in particular with SELECTION_MULTIPLE, where we
cannot figure out in advance of real_set_cursor() if the selection will
actually change.
Previously, the cursor would just become invalid, which used to
reselect the first row in the treeview later on (without a
cursor-changed signal). This leads to a crash now with the recent
refactorings.
The patch is longer than I'd like it to be, but the situation is kinda
complicated, because we want to make sure to move the cursor to a good
row. It works like this:
1) From the deleted row, search forward for the first row that is not
going to be deleted and is not a separator.
2) If no such row exists, search backwards for a row that is not a
separator.
3) If no such node exists, clear the cursor.
Previously the code used a GtkTreeRowReference, which was (a) less
performant and more importantly (b) hiding errors.
The errors being hidden were the referenced row becoming invalid or
collapsed, because such rows would not be valid cursor rows and it would
be necesary to select a new row and emit a "cursor-changed" signal.
So if a crash bisects down to this commit, it is very likely that the
cursor has not correctly been updated and the cursor row is invalid.
Previously, when the cursor was a descendant of the collapsed row,
the cursor path was set to the collapsed row, but this was not
communicated via cursor-changed events.
_gtk_tree_view_find_path() was not a name that not really described what
the function does. And I kept forgetting it. Also, it took the tree view
as an argument and that was completely unnecessary.
Turned assertion into silent return.
This assertion is only hit when dragging from an empty tree view. In
this case, gtk_tree_view_begin_drag() is triggered from gtkdnd.c and not
from gtk_tree_view_maybe_begin_dragging_row(). We actually want to
cancel the drag at this point, but that is not possible with the GTK+
API as far as I can see.
The alternative is to not allowing the drag to start. This could be
done by simply unsetting the tree view as drag source when it is empty
and setting it as drag source again when rows are added. I didn't
choose to go with this for now, since this will likely break third party
code.
In gtk_tree_view_state_flags_changed() we were setting the background on
the bin_window without the necessary "view" style class, making the
treeview render with the wrong color in some circumstances (such as when
adding an empty treeview in a window, as spotted by Brian Smith).
This way, the a11y code knows if a column was reordered, added or
removed and can do the right things instead of trying to guess and
getting it wrong.
Also, this patch finalizes the changes so that only visible columns
exist to the accessibility interface.
.. as a replacement for _gtk_rbtree_node_find_parity(). Instead of 1 or
0, the function now returns the index of node in the complete tree
(counting from the root). And this is of course identical to the row
number.
Track the RBNode/RBTree instead of keeping a TreeRowReference. This is a
whole lot faster and less error-prone.
Also, notify the accessible of removal of rows before actually removing
them, so we have a chance to clean up.
The default (out) transfer mode is "full", but the passed "model" pointer gets
set to gtk_tree_view_get_model() which is "transfer none". This caused Python
programs to free the model after calling this, causing crashes.
in gtkimcontextsimple and gtktreeview, which are the easy places,
but also true bugfixes, because on OSX we can't use the virtual META
here, we needs MOD2 as delivered in key events.
which are SHIFT and MOD2 on the Mac, and SHIFT and CONTROL otherwise.
Use the new define all over the place and rename variables and
members to not say "shift" or "control".
This commit introduces a new setting, gtk-visible-focus, backed
by the Gtk/VisibleFocus X setting. Its three values control how
focus rectangles are displayed.
'always' is equivalent to the traditional GTK+ behaviour of always
rendering focus rectangles.
'never' does what it says, and is intended for keyboardless
situations, e.g. tablets.
'automatic' hides focus rectangles initially, until the user
interacts with the keyboard, at which point focus rectangles
become visible.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649567
Now that we are not allocating treeview column buttons anymore
with invisible headers, we can't rely on their allocations for
other things like cell area computations anymore. Use x-offset
and width of the column directly, instead.
Include the child widget path in the returned path now. This allows
customizing the path of the current widgets - like adding flags to child
widgets (and maybe siblings in the future).
Patches by Benjamin Otte.
The "invalidate last column" hack is removed. It is now of no use since
the entire widget will be redrawn when a single column changes.
We have to redraw if we are below a couple of rows that changed height
in do_validate_rows(). This will still require a redraw for a large
amount of cases, can we do better? You would expect that a redraw of
the tree view is not required when the dy changes with the same delta
as the delta of the height accrued when validating the nodes. This
further optimization will likely require changes to the top_row/dy
synchronization code.
It turns out that the gtk_grab_remove() can trigger a do_prelight()
call, which may end up changing prelight_node, and then the state
gets messed up. Moving the grab removal until after we're done with
button_pressed_node and prlight_node makes expanders work reliably.
One thing that is still not right is that the expander doesn't get
prelight again after the animation is done, if you manage to release
without any additional motion events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641039
Expander animation has been replaced by implicit animations
from the style context.
Column headers are also properly themed, GtkContainer::get_path_for_child()
is implemented and the treeview resets column buttons style on columns
being reordered.
The default CSS has changed to theme treeviews sensibly.
This function is useful to figure out whether the tree view is "blank"
at a given location. For such locations you might want to popup a
custom popup menu, clear the current selection or start rubber banding.
In the future, we are planning on updating GtkTreeView's user
interactions to take advantage of this new function.
Part of bug 350618.
I have never really liked the updates done to the adjustments in
do_validate_rows() and other validation functions. But it is really
required. I have to come up with a real solution to this one day.
Check (x, y) is inside background area. If yes, continue processing
and clamp the coordinates into cell area. This way we will properly
handle getting a cell (which is only used for setting the focus cell)
for clicks in the indentation area (in LTR and RTL mode) and clicks
in the focus rectangle area in case focus-line-width is large.
When focus is initially grabbed and there is no focus column, when selecting
the first column for focus, further explicitly focus into the first cell
using gtk_cell_area_focus().
the edge.
When focusing left/right or up/down inside GtkCellArea, now we save what
was the last focused cell and if we hit the side (or top or bottom) of
the view we then restore focus to the last focused cell.
This function did alot of nothing, gtk_cell_area_focus() simply returns whether
the focus stays in the area (column) or not, seems not to cause regressions to
just call it directly instead.
Instead this is now enforced in gtk_tree_view_get_cell_area_height().
There are rows for which a height in between 0 and expander_size is
allowed, for example separator rows.
This argument allows the caller to specify that only an editable
cell should start editing but an activatable cell should not toggle
it's state, this is important for public apis like
gtk_tree_view_set_cursor_on_cell() which are only intended to
programatically bring attention to the editing of a specific
row or cell but not actually change any data.
GtkTreeView & CellAreaScaffold updated for the last minute api change.
This fix is incorrect, treeviews dont rely on the expander size for drawing
separator rows (added XXX comment in line), need to fix this somewhere else
Now we bookkeep the treeview assigned padding asides from the
requested width stored in the GtkCellAreaContext, this removes
the need for bookkeeping the deepest expanded depth in gtktreeview.c
At allocation time, just remove the padding from the allocated width
of the column and feed the rest to the underlying cell area.
The function has been re-implemented around GtkCellArea. This commits
also brings back the invocation of this function in
gtk_tree_view_button_press(). I shouldn't have removed this.
This is a premature patch, it traverses the tree's expanded
rows and fetches the deepest depth every time we allocate a
column. The deepest depth should rather be cached and pushed
when a row expands, then recalculated when the deepest expanded
row collapses.
Removed gtk_tree_view_get_real_requested_width_from_column() from
gtktreeview.c in favor of this function in the treeviewcolumn domain
(since this function goes and checks treeviewcolumn internals, settings
and derives the real requested width, seems logical this should be done
by the treeviewcolumn instead).
Now the GtkTreeViewColumn takes care of move/resizing its window and
allocating its button (except for the special case of current drag_column
where the column doesnt actually get reallocated).
Some details:
- button_request was not needed, consult the minimum request of the button
- gtk_tree_view_column_get_button() needed to be public as people can set
tooltips on the button (and libgail accesses the button).
This is because focus in treeviews can be given to cells that cannot do anything
with activation (for better keynav), so we dissociate the concept of cell
activation and focusing.
This is still very much a work in progress, but it renders and more or
less works. I will be fixing up the details in the very near future.
Important: this commit breaks ABI as it modifies the GtkTreeViewColumn
structure in gtktreeviewcolumn.h. This is a sealed structure that needs
to be moved to an internal header file, most likely gtktreeprivate.h.
This should be implemented as propery height-for-width by
the treeview-refactor branch. This commit includes a FIXME
comment that scroll adjustments should not be updated from
inside size requests but only after receiving an allocation.
This patch adds the GtkScrollablePolicy type property to GtkScrollable
and implements it in all subclasses. GtkScrolledWindow observes this
property to make a good guess about when to show/hide scrollbars for
height-for-width content.
Most scrollable children do not do height-for-width *yet* but
most certainly will (toolpalette, treeview, iconview, textview
widgets all TODO), for scrollable widgets that do have a minimum
and natural size, it's important for them to observe the state
of this property in order to properly drive the scroll adjustments
according to the desired GtkScrollablePolicy. This patch makes
GtkViewport do this.
Patch also adds tests/testscrolledwindow.c to display the effects
of this property.
The scrollable patch removed set_scroll_adjustments (NULL, NULL) from
gtk_tree_view_init() which ensured the treeview would have adjustments
at all times, this patch adds set_v/hadjustment (NULL) to _init to ensure
the same thing (without it, there are crashes when trying to access the
adjustments notably from set_headers_visible() in gedit).
