Calling eglGetDisplay forces libEGL to guess what kind of pointer you
passed it. Different EGL libraries will do different things here, and in
particular glvnd will do something different than Mesa. Since we do have
an API that allows us to explicitly type the display, use it.
The explicit call to eglGetProcAddress is working around a bug in
libepoxy 1.3, which does not understand the EGL concept of client
extensions. Since it does not, the normal epoxy resolver for
eglGetPlatformDisplayEXT would not find any provider for that entry
point, and crash when you attempted to call it.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772415
EGLDisplays are already opaque pointers, and eglGetDisplay returns an
EGLDisplay not a pointer to one.
Signed-off-by: Adam Jackson <ajax@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772415
This adds vendor and product id and axes. This reveals that
the GDK backends have quite different quality when it comes
to returning meaningful information here.
This helps isolate the inspector from some of the changes that
it can trigger. To specify a different display, set
GTK_INSPECTOR_DISPLAY to the name of the display to use for
the inspector window. If no display is specified, GTK+ will
use a separate connection to the default display.
Move the touchscreen switch to the other debug switches, and
move the hidpi spin to the other graphical controls. Since the
Visual tab is getting large, make it scroll. The General tab
is purely informational again.
Some of the features we expose can be hardcoded via environment
variables. In that case, don't confuse the user by letting them
change settings that have no effect.
The entire UI is constructed with templates, so the wrapper
constructors are never called, except for gtk_inspector_window_new,
which gets called from the GTK+ code.
