Update the Visual Studio projects for gtka11y and the completion of the
projects that go along with it. This have been distcheck'ed on my Ubuntu
12.04 system.
We don't want to emit state changes for all the cells in a row, just for
the cell in the expander column. It's the only one that reports EXPANDED
or EXPANDABLE states, after all.
Also, contains refactoring of the affected functions for all the special
cases.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694059
We weren't checking the removed flag but the added flag for removal
emissions, so what would happen for every state change notification was:
- on state-added, both an "added" and a "removed" event were emitted
- on state-removed, nothing
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694059
The "activate" action here did not do anything.
It is possible we actually want to have some actions here,
like "step-up", "step-down", "page-up", "page-down", etc.
For now, just remove the AtkAction implementation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553334
-Rename the "libgail" projects to gtka11y, for consistency with the
autotools builds
-Update the projects completion in gtk/a11y/Makefile.am, as the sources are
now listed under $(libgtka11y_la_SOURCES) instead of $(libgail_la_SOURCES)
An instance of GtkAdjustment may be used by another instance after
the spin button widget is destroyed. In that case, the function
gtk_spin_button_accessible_value_changed() will be called with an
invalid argument. This situation is often caused when one use
GtkCellRendererSpin widget. To avoid invalid call of the function,
the signal handler for the "value-changed" signal should be disconnected
when the spin-button widget is destroyed.
Using g_signal_connect_object achieves just that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691592
Since we are going to install these headers soon, we need
to make their mutual includes work in the installed location
as well. Also, avoid including individual gtk headers, to
avoid trouble with single-include guards.
This commit exposes the get_type() functions and standard
headers for accessible implementations. This makes it possible
to derive from the GTK accessible implementations without
GType magic tricks. This is necessary, because we require the
a11y type hierarchy to be parallel to the widget type hierarchy.
So, if you derive a widget and need to adjust its a11y implementation,
you have to be able to derive its accessible implementation.
This commit probably exposes more than is absolutely necessary,
it also exposes accessibles of widgets that are unlikely candidates
for deriving from.
The code path where we update the tooltip text property doesn't set
the state and value variables, and so doesn't need to call
notify_state_change().
Return early, and move the if block at the beginning of the function for
clarity.
Expose GtkEntry icons as child accessibles of a GtkEntry, and provide
actions to simulate clicking them. Also, refactor the a11y children test
slightly to add a test.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686347
Move instance fields to a private struct, in preparation
for installing a11y headers.
This also required removing access to GtkWidgetAccessible innards
from several accessible implementations.
Move instance fields to a private struct, in preparation
for installing a11y headers.
This also required removing access to GtkToplevelAccessible innards
from the GtkWindowAccessible implementation.
Move instance fields to a private struct, in preparation
for installing a11y headers.
This also required removing access to GtkRendererCellAccessible innards
from various cell accessible implementations.
