Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
Widgets that already have a resize queued don't need to walk the whole
parent chain and queue another resize. It's enough to do it once per
resize.
This also means that sizegroups cannot use the shortcut of just
invalidating the first widget in the group anymore. That widget might
already have a resize queued while others don't.
Before this commit, a widget tree like this:
Window
AnyContainer (part of SizeGroup1)
GtkClutterEmbed
SomeWidget
when calling gtk_widget_queue_resize(SomeWidget), would invalidate
SizeGroup1, when it should have stopped at the GtkClutterEmbed (which is
a RESIZE_IMMEDIATE child).
Instead of handling the horizontal and vertical peers separately
(and often, duplicatively), collect all peers in one go. At the
same time, avoid creating and destroying hash tables more often
than necessary.
Instead of issuing g_warning, fill the provided GError.
This lets us test this error handling, and is the right
thing to do. Use the new GtkBuilder helpers and
g_markup_collect_attributes to do so.
... instead of GtkSizeGroupMode. Orientation is what we're interested in
after all. When we need a GtkSizeGroupMode, we can do the translation
where we need it.
This way we don't need a marker on GtkWidgetParivate that needs to be
unset later, so we have all our data in the same place and can avoid
problems with reentrancy and shenanigans like that.
But the main reason I wrote that is cleaner code.
With this function now available, we can do size computation in 2
ways:
(1) Compute size with size groups
(2) Compute size without size groups
And have (1) use (2) instead of setting flags on widgets. This patch
does exactly that.
The current approach of using gtk_widget_get_mapped() is broken:
The usual steps taken when showing a window are:
(1) request the sizes
(2) allocate the sizes
(3) show the window in the allocated size
Showing the window with a random size between steps (1) and (2) would of
course
result in extra work and potential flickering when the widgets get
resized to
their proper sizes.
However, as GtkSizeGroup::ignore-hidden uses gtk_widget_get_mapped() to
determine visibility for a widget, the following will happen:
(1) the widget will request a 0 size
(2) the widget will be allocated a 0 size
(3) the widget will be too small when it is shown
gtk_widget_get_visible() however is set in advance. Note that toggling
visibility also causes a gtk-widget_queue_resize() call already so we
take care of changes in here automatically.
Instead of only checking the ignore_hidden flag when getting the
preferred sizes, respect it already when constructing the list of
widgets. This way, widgets don't queue resizes for groups they're
ignored in anyway.
For loops to loop over lists look nicer and actually do the right thing
with "break" and "continue" statements. So they are vastly preferred to
while loops.
