Similar to previous removals of g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID we can remove
other marshallers for which are a simple G_TYPE_NONE with single parameter.
In those cases, GLib will setup both a c_marshaller and va_marshaller for
us. Before this commit, we would not get a va_marshaller because the
c_marshaller is set.
Related to GNOME/Initiatives#10
If we set c_marshaller manually, then g_signal_newv() will not setup a
va_marshaller for us. However, if we provide c_marshaller as NULL, it will
setup both the c_marshaller (to g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID) and
va_marshaller (to g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOIDv) for us.
They're either wrong (when using FALSE because the widgets don't account
for changes to the CSS) or unnecessary (when using TRUE because it's the
default).
Fixes!1777
It turns out we don't really need to use a separate gadget for the
infobar, if all we do is chaining up to the parent GtkBox which already
uses a gadget.
Just remove all the boilerplate.
Use G_PARAM_DEPRECATED with deprecated style properties.
This will make it easier to identify and remove such stale
properties from css, since it will now trigger warnings.
Instead of issuing g_warning, fill the provided GError.
This lets us test this error handling, and is the right
thing to do. Use the new GtkBuilder helpers and
g_markup_collect_attributes to do so.
Try to do a better job of keeping example content
from being too wide. It is often rendered as <pre>
text so the only time we can wrap it is in the source.
It is best to full break lines at all punctuation and
to try to keep the width under 70 chars or so.
When enable-animations is false, the revealer's child-revealed property is
notified immediately, so make sure to connect to it before toggling the
revealer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719510
We rename the gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal}
macros by appending a _private to their name. Otherwise, it
would be too magic to pass the 'public' names as arguments,
but affect a member of the Private struct. At the same time,
Add two new macros with the old names,
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal} that operate
on members of the instance struct.
The macros and functions are inconsistently named, and are not tied to
the "template" concept - to the point that it seems plausible to use
them without setting the template.
The new naming scheme is as follows:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_full
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback_full
With the convenience macros:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_internal
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700898https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700896
Using an offset from the struct means you can have children in
both the public and private (via G_PRIVATE_OFFSET) parts of the
instance. It also matches the new private macros nicer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702563
Signed-off-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@gnome.org>
We've recently a number of classes wholly. For these cases,
move the headers and sources to gtk/deprecated/ and adjust
Makefiles and includes accordingly.
Affected classes:
GtkAction
GtkActionGroup
GtkActivatable
GtkIconFactory
GtkImageMenuItem
GtkRadioAction
GtkRecentAction
GtkStock
GtkToggleAction
GtkUIManager
A vertical action area causes the info bar to be imposingly large.
This defeats the whole point of the info bar which is to be
unobtrusive. Not to mention it is impossible to make it look
and feel good.
