Widgets should only call set_realized() after having created and
registered their GDK windows. In this case, the creation of the style
context (or more exactly: figuring out the scale factor for it) requires
knowing if the widget is already realized. Which it isn't.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726717
expected a valid semicolon
sounds kinda not so great. Make it say
expected semicolon
Unless somebody can tell me the difference between valid and invalid
semicolons?
We had a margin of 30 before/after the text. Put that add around
the icon as well, and separate the icon and text by 30 pixels.
This does not affect the appearance of message dialogs without
icons.
If a textview had lateral windows that might displace the text window, the
handles and popovers would appear displaced. Those lateral windows aren't
affected by RTL/LTR settings, so just checking for left/top is ok here.
We want to present a clean, rounded top when there is nothing
else to show, but many dialogs in applications rely on showing
information in their title, so add a label and show the title
when it is not empty.
Add gdk_device_get_last_event_window(), and use to implement the window
tracking we need for synthesizing crossing events for sensitivity changes
and gtk grabs, rather than keeping the information in qdata and updating
it based when GTK+ gets events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726187
Stop ignoring various crossing events from grabs:
Enter events with type GRAB/GTK_GRAB/GTK_UNGRAB/STATE_CHANGED:
Ignoring these events was added as a workaround for synthesized
events not having the right coordinates (see bug 555109) but
now they do have the right coordinates. (see bug 704456)
Leave events with types types GTK_GRAB/GTK_UNGRAB:
Ignoring these events was added because since we were ignoring
the enter events as above, ignoring the leave events meant we
could lose the prelighted row in a grab-triggered leave/enter
pair. (See bug 653676. It's also now impossible to
reproduce the leave events that were reported in that bug as causing
problems.)
Leave events of type GRAB.
Ignoring these events was added without a ChangeLog entry in 2001,
possibly to keep the prelight from flashing when activating menus.
But ignoring these events could lead to stuck prelighting, and we don't
do it for any other widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726209
The bug this patch is fixing is that currently if you have a GtkPopover in
clicking off the popover to dismiss it on a GtkTreeView (which triggers
a synthetic enter event on the GtkTreeView) will leave the GtkTreeView
in a confused state until the user moves the mouse again.
That doesn't make sense.
And it causes issues, because when holding down the tab key, we
show/hide a lot of windows and cause a lot of map/unmap events that
stall the event pipeline.
We did not set an input shape on the window, so the region outside
the invisible border where we draw the outer edges of the shadow
were still part of the window, as far as clicks and cursors were
concerned. Fix this by setting an input shape that makes all clicks
outside of the resize borders go through to the underlying window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726125
And let GtkPopover use it as its GtkAccessible implementation, this
accessible sets the POPUP_FOR relationship to the relative-to widget,
and keeps track of changes there.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725864
As those are internal children, there's no signal that GtkWindowAccessible
could catch when those are added or removed, so make GtkWindow use the private
GtkContainerAccessible methods to add/remove the child accessible when that
happens.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725864
As discussed on desktop-devel-list [1], "There should be an intuitive,
consistent, immediate way to jump to the widgets that live in the
header bar." F10 has been suggested for this as it is already used to
active menubars.
F10 will focus the custom titlebar widget if the window has one and it
isn't already focused. If the titlebar widget doesn't exist or is
already focused then F10 focuses the menubar if there is one.
[1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2014-February/msg00176.htmlhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725141
It turns out popovers are already smart enough to cope with this
situation, so let popovers be internal children so things that rely
on gtk_container_forall(), like DnD, work without modifications.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725727
It may be unusual, but handlers of day-selected may want to transfer
focus somewhere else, without getting it reset back right after by/to
the calendar. This makes popovers demo work on the calendar again, for
one...
Make the popover temporarily undo the GTK+ grab, so it remains modal
to its window, but does not attempt to steal focus on other non-modal
windows that get the focus.
This was most confusing with keyboard navigation, as the focus would
remain stuck on the popover, and not move to the newly focused window
after the popover was dismissed. It didn't have as much effect on
pointer operations as only the first click would be consumed in order
to hide the popover.
There are early returns in this method before the completion timeout
is set later on, so set the source to 0 to avoid trying to remove it
later again.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725824
This is not necessary for the popover itself, but helps tooltips
code confine the widget lookup within the popover if the pointer
is inside it, otherwise the widget lookup may turn out wrong for
motion events, starting the tooltip widget lookup from the toplevel
window, mistakenly triggering tooltips on the natural window
descendants (ie. the widget below the popover)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=724785
