For the one update_layout_width call in size_allocate, we can just use
the passed-in allocation width instead of a separate (relatively slow)
gtk_widget_get_width call.
Instead of allowing people to pass a uint user-data, insist on them
comparing mime types.
The user data was a uint instead of a pointer anyway, so uniqueness
could not be guaranteed and it caused more issues than it was worth.
And that's ignoring the fact that it basically wasn't used.
Change constructors to reflect that.
While doing so, also add a fallback argument to the cursor constructors,
so it is now possible to create cursors with fallback.
This patch makes that work using 1 of 2 options:
1. Add all missing enums to the switch statement
or
2. Cast the switch argument to a uint to avoid having to do that (mostly
for GdkEventType).
I even found a bug while doing that: clearing a GtkImage with a surface
did not notify thae surface property.
The reason for enabling this flag even though it is tedious at times is
that it is very useful when adding values to an enum, because it makes
GTK immediately warn about all the switch statements where this enum is
relevant.
And I expect changes to enums to be frequent during the GTK4 development
cycle.
Refactor the code updating the active link under the current coordinates
into a separate function, and call it on GtkGestureMultiPress::pressed
so the link is updated on GDK_TOUCH_BEGIN. Based on a patch by
Jan-Michael Brummer <jan.brummer@tabos.org>.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776903
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
The label measuring code was only determining baselines
when the label was set to wrap, which does not seem right.
Non-wrapping labels have a meaningful baseline as well,
report it back.
We now rely on toplevels receiving and forwarding all the events
the windowing should be able to handle. Event masks are no longer a
way to determine whether an event is deliverable ot a widget.
Events will always be delivered in the three captured/target/bubbled
phases, widgets can now just attach GtkEventControllers and let those
handle the events.
In the else branch of the if statement before this one, we're assigning
*smallest = *widest anyway, so this if statement is never true. Move it
to the if block before instead, where it can apply.
