Don't use ASCII control characters to denote the input of Esc, Tab,
Return/Enter, Backspace and Delete, as it seems that it is not how
Windows handle them, and they cause weird characters to appear in the
input field on GTK+3 programs in non-English Windows. Instead, let
these keys be handled as-is on Windows, like what is done in GTK+-2.x.
Checked with mclasen on IRC, and thanks to the people who verified the
patch to not break anything on English Windows.
When using Shift-Tab to move the focus out of page content onto
the tab label, we end up in a situation where both Tab and Shift-Tab
move focus back into the page, which is not really what is expected
when the notebook is part of a dialog.
Instead, arrange things so that using Shift-Tab with focus on a
tab label moves the focus out of the notebook.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669986
It turns out that we can end up removing a notebook child while
the tab is still 'detached'. Child removal causes
gtk_notebook_remove_tab_label() to be called on the tab label,
but that function did not deal with the eventuality that the tab
label may be a child of the dnd window.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677943
Some builders using gtk3 outside of the GNOME cycle want an option to
avoid linking to atk-bridge-2.0. Provide that, and at the same time
ensure we're only looking for it on X11 platforms.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677491
Make GMountOperation look for an owner of org.Gtk.MountOperationHandler
if possible, and use it instead of the GTK-based dialogs.
This allows applications to use the implementation offered by the
desktop shell, if available, through a DBus private interface:
org.Gtk.MountOperationHandler.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674963
This gets the current cell area of a particular item. Its similar
to gtk_tree_view_get_cell_area().
The code is extracted from gtk_icon_view_set_tooltip_cell which now
just calls the old code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=678418
gdk_device_list_slave_devices only makes sense to call on master
devices, yet its g_return_if_fail check made it reject such devices.
Pointed out by monty.
When a widget is app_paintable, its background should not be drawn by
the theme, thus we should not try to override its background again when
style-updated is fired.
This is a bit of a hack, but it fixes gray surfaces observed for DnD
windows with recent GTK+.
As used in Totem and gnome-contacts. The widget
takes either a GtkMenu or a GMenuModel to construct
its menu, and can be given a parent widget to use to
position the drop-down (as used in GtkMenuToolButton).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668013
If the icon view is empty, we cannot get a reasonable size request from
the cell renderers. So all values we would compute are pretty much
useless.
So we special case it.
This also gets rid of a bunch of crashers from div-by-0 in corner cases.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677809
This is useful for 2 reasons:
(1) Items actually exist and are clickable
(2) Size computations don't divide by 0
I've not seen problems with this in the wild (mostly because
item-padding defaults to non-0), but noticed this while fixing other
bugs.
Minimum size is necessary so you can see the item. If we can't get that
we need to scroll.
Natural as the maximum is used so that the spacing between items doesn't
increase when resizing the iconview, but empty space is added to the
right/bottom instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677809
While working on the "iconview: Don't shrink items" patch I noticed that
gtk_icon_view_compute_n_items_for_size modifies the natural and minimum
item sizes it got from gtk_icon_view_get_preferred_item_size when
calculating the max number of items which will fit, but later on it
checks against these sizes when calculating the item_size, and these
checks expect these values to be unmodified.
This patch fixes this by modifying the natural and minimum values in
advance and doing all computations with modified values.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677809
