These tests can be run manually, but are not suitable for use as an
acceptance test, so let's not make frameworks like Debian's autopkgtest
run these when they run ginsttest-runner in the most obvious way.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
There are two possible interpretations of "expected failure": either
the test *must* fail (exactly the inverse of an ordinary test, with
success becoming failure and failure becoming success), or the test
*may* fail (with success intended, but failure possible in some
environments). Autotools had the second interpretation, which seems
more useful in practice, but Meson has the first.
Instead of using should_fail, we can put the tests in one of two new
suites: "flaky" is intended for tests that succeed or fail unpredictably
according to the test environment or chance, while "failing" is for
tests that ought to succeed but currently never do as a result of a
bug or missing functionality. With a sufficiently new version of Meson,
the flaky and failing tests are not run by default, but can be requested
by running a setup that does not exclude them, with a command like:
meson test --setup=x11_unstable --suite=flaky --suite=failing
As a bonus, now that we're setting up setups and their excluded suites
programmatically, the gsk-compare-broadway tests are also excluded by
default when running the test setup for a non-broadway backend.
When running the tests in CI, --suite=gtk overrides the default
exclude_suites, so we have to specify --no-suite=flaky and
--no-suite=failing explicitly.
This arrangement is inspired by GNOME/glib!2987, which was contributed
by Marco Trevisan.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
By dividing the blur radius to obtain the clip radius, we may end up
with halved values that result in an overshunk clip mask. Extend this
so that we ensure to cover the last pixel.
Fixes artifacts seen with the cairo renderer in X11 when resizing
windows horizontally, a black 1px high line would be seen in the
top of the window due to these outset bounds being used in clipping.
More mysteriously, also seems to fix resize lag in the GL renderer
(also X11), if e.g. the bottom-right corner of a window is resized
diagonally in bottom-left -> top-right direction, or
bottom-right -> top-left.
Related: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2175#note_1599335
By using wl_output_release(), GDK lets the compositor to clean up the
output global more nicely.
For example, currently, most compositors remove the global and then
destroy it later after N seconds expire. With this, the compositor could
experiment with destroying the output global once all its resources are
destroyed.
this allows setting a Gtk.GestureStylus to a state, where it can be
used to handle non-stylus devices (e.g. mice).
This might be useful for applications that handle stylus input, but
want to allow falling back to a mice, if the user is unable to provide
stylus input.
this is to prevent gdk from causing a segfault, when getting event axes
for events that don't have them (i.e. attempting to get pressure from a
mice input device).
GDK_TOUCH_END deserves the same treatment than GDK_BUTTON_RELEASE, since it's
subject to the same circumstances (popping up a menu on long press would be
immediately dismissed on release if we handled them there). Ideally, we would
want to match releases that we obtained a press for while grabbed, but as
the popup is also dismissed on GDK_BUTTON_PRESS/GDK_TOUCH_BEGIN, there's no
use for this tracking.
And GDK_TOUCH_CANCEL sounds weird as a reason to dismiss popups, just like
crossing events would.
Related: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/2512
Even though button 1 (or touch down) presses do most often have
an effect in one way or another (starting drag, moving focus,
starting selection, ...), there is one situation that they do
immediately nothing: When clicking on the entry does not move
the text caret around. Dragging might start a selection, but
the entry did not do anything just yet, and an immediate
button/touch release should remain at "did nothing".
And that is precisely the hint that the Wayland IM context's click
gesture takes, clicks that do not scroll nor move the caret around,
having the GtkText not claim the gesture in that situation makes
the IM gesture able to do its thing without in-fighting.
This is typically not a problem when the GtkText is embedded in
another GtkEditable implementation (e.g. GtkEntry), since the
IM gesture is inactive and capturing from the parent widget, so
gets a pass that it otherwise doesn't get when both gestures are
in the same widget. This makes it work regardless of GtkText not
being a child of a composite widget, like NautilusQueryEditor
and AdwRowEntry.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5351
Everybody (including myself) gets this wrong,
so accept 'simple' and 'none' as shorthands
for the official IDs 'gtk-im-context-simple'
and 'gtk-im-context-none'.
