CSD titlebar are included in the focus-chain. The logic used makes sure that the
initial focus avoids the titlebar, but tabbing around will eventually get there.
This logic fails in case the window has no other focusable widgets apart from
the ones in the header-bar. If this happens keynav focus will be lost. To handle
the above scenario, we need to fallback to focus the header-bar (if any).
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/issues/404
The opaque region is only set when the background color is opaque. So
we need to do something about it when the background color changes.
However, in the case where a size allocation is going to happen, we
already do this update in size_allocate(), so in that case avoid doing
it twice.
According to the spec compositors were to assume surfaces are CSD until
told otherwise. This means we need to send
org_kde_kwin_server_decoration_request_mode in both cases.
This fixes libreoffice under kwin, which would remove it's own headers
as per the manager's request but not inform kwin leaving it in the even
more broken state of having none.
meta-pick of commit c1573a1fda: the
variable gdk_window is used in a check, but we may as well use it again
to avoid calling _gtk_widget_get_window() again unnecessarily.
application/x-rootwindow-drop is not useful anywhere else,
so put it under #ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11
On W32 this prevents toplevels from automatically becoming valid
drop targets with a useless drop type.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786509
This has no practical effect on Adwaita, but might fix some
third-party themes that were broken by GTK+ 3.22.23.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789357
If the compositor prefers server-side decorations and the client doesn't
customize the title bar, we disable client-side decorations and let the
compositor know. Otherwise, we continue to use client-side decorations.
Signed-off-by: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781909
The last touch on this patch series is making GtkWindow able to
selectively adjust various UI details based on the different
tiled edges. The main driver here is that we don't want to show
shadows on edges that are constrained.
This patch adds the necessary code to do that, while still
maintaining compatibility with the old ways.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
GTK windows don't have their tiling states really
hooked into the client-side decoration code, and
the only effect it has is disabling the resizing
edges.
With the introduction of per-edge tiling information,
we are backed by much more precise data on how the
window manager wants the app to behave.
This patch, then, fixes GtkWindow to take into account
per-edge tiling information. For compatibility purposes,
the previous tiled field was kept, and thing will just
continue working if no edge information is supplied.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783669
Clarify that ::destroy, not ::hide*, removes a window from its app, by
replacing the mention of open windows with the blurb on destruction from
:application, completing commit 7db4bee4b6
Also link to the equivalent gtk_application_(add|remove)_window() calls,
since Application.add_window() already links back to Window:application.
* unless you use gtkmm…
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639931
Do not connect to get_settings_for_screen() if we have no screen…
Use g_signal_connect(), not connect_object(), to match how set_screen()
makes these same connections, and how finalize() already disconnects.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705640
The user data passed when exporting a Wayland window was supposed to be
freed using the destroy_func, as is commonly done. This was previously
broken, as the user data was just NULL:ed when exported, and only
actually destroyed when unexporting before having exported.
While e016d9a5db fixed this, it introduced
a regression, as GtkWindow was nice enough to free the memory anyway
after having received the exported handle, causing it now to double
free.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782109
Setting the shadow width earlier as done with commit 4cb1b96 to address
bug 771561 proved to cause unexpected side effects on size_allocate
signal propagation.
As the window is sized correctly earlier, the size_allocate signal is
not emitted again in gtk_widget_size_allocate_with_baseline() which
prevents clutter-gtk from relocating its child widget correctly.
To avoid this issue, revert commit 4cb1b96 but make sure the values
passed as min and max size is never negative in Wayland as this is a
protocol error.
With this, the min/max size will be wrong for a short amount of time,
during the state transition, until the shadow width is updated from
gdk_window_set_shadow_width().
This approach is much safer and less intrusive than changing the
size_allocate logic in gtk.
This reverts commit 4cb1b9645e.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771915
Otherwise, with CSD, we could have a discrepancy where gtk uses the
right values for the shadows whereas the gdk backend still uses the old
values, leading in some cases to invalid or negative min size being
computed (which, in Wayland, leads a protocol error).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771561
The main corpus of the documentation for gtk_window_get_size() is still
full of X11-isms, so we should port it to something that is more
backend-agnostic. Additionally, having some examples would be nice for
application authors looking at a way to appropriately use this function.
Introduce a private API meant for abstracting how to get a handle
of a window that can be shared with other processes. The API is
async, since some implementations will require that. Currently,
only X11 is supported, which doesn't.
Based on a patch by Jonas Adahl.
This matches the behaviour of Mutter, Metacity and traditional X11
window managers on the window manager side, and is what we want
for at least gnome-terminal. I can't think of any reason why we'd
want incremental resize in any other tiled window.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760944https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755947
If we have an application that never goes idle (or takes a long time to
go idle), the close buttons in CSD decoration don't work properly.
While it's not clear why the usage of an idle was added in the first
place, keep on using it to avoid unexpected reentrancy problems, but
change the priority to G_PRIORITY_DEFAULT.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768485
This partly reverts 9f5b9c0e07, which
removed the check for GtkWidget-window-dragging in the multipress
gesture. This check is still needed for widgets which have this style
property set (e.g. menubars and toolbars) can maximize the window on
double click -- but those widgets which have it set to FALSE shouldn't
maximize the window.
GtkHeadeBar checks the window type hint to determine if the regular
buttons such as menu, maximize or iconify should be visible in the
header bar.
However, an application may very well use a "normal" toplevel window and
set it transient and modal afterwards. In such a case, the iconify
button would remain visible, and the user can hide the window, but being
a modal, the parent window would remain insensitive.
Check for the window type, modality and transient relationship to decide
whether or not the regular toplevel buttons should be visible in the
header bar.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767052
glade-previewer places a gtkwindow inside another toplevel gtkwindow,
updating the shadow width for the client induces a busy loop where the
parent will grow continuously until it crashes gnome-shell/mutter.
To avoid the loop, do not update the shadow width if not dealing with a
toplevel window.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761651
Commit cdc580463e made it so that
unresizable windows can't be smaller than a set default size but it
lost the logic to ensure these windows remain at least big enough to
comply with their requisition.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764174
