This avoids a bunch of policy problems with deciding how to lay
out the window menu under different WMs.
For now, we use the special event _GTK_SHOW_WINDOW_MENU, but we
hope to have this standardized in wm-spec quite soon, as KDE wants
it as well.
It seems that some backends implemented get_root_origin wrong
and returned the client window coordinates, not the frame window
coordinates. Since it's possible to implement generically for all
windows, let's do that instead of having a separate impl vfunc.
And the counterpart to unmaximize when dragging a maximized window, if
touch devices aren't going to use EWMH moveresize, having this one at least
makes things feel a bit less awkward.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709914
Sadly, EWMH moveresize mechanism can't work with touch devices for two
reasons:
1) As a mutter implementation detail, the device is queried in order
to check whether the dragging button is still pressed. Touch devices
won't report the button 1 being pressed through pointer emulation.
2) Even bypassing that check, on X11 touch events are selected prior
to sequences being started, either through XISelectEvents or
XIGrabTouchBegin, no late registering through active grabs is allowed,
as WMs do on reaction to EWMH moveresize messages.
So for the time being, make touch devices fallback on emulated window
dragging, which at least allows for moving windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709914
We have a hack in the XSETTINGS code to substitute gtk-xft-dpi
with gdk-unscaled-dpi unless the screen has a fixed window scale,
in which case we just use gtk-xft-dpi.
But if the screen is changed to have a fixed window scale, then
the substituted value of gdk-unscaled-dpi will stick around until
the next (coincidental) change to XSETTINGS. To fix this, force
an immediate reread of the XSETTINGS property when
gdk_x11_display_set_window_scale() is used.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725754
Instead of destroying the surface in the backend if this is
unable to resize, let the core code do it, and do it properly.
Based on a patch by Benjamin Otte.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725172
This setting will let us keep traditional appearance
of dialogs on platforms where this is expected.
The new setting is called gtk-dialogs-use-header, backed
by the Gtk/DialogsUseHeader xsetting.
The EWMH defines _NET_WM_MOVERESIZE_SIZE_KEYBOARD and
_NET_WM_MOVERESIZE_MOVE_KEYBOARD for operations that are not
initiated by a button-press event. Allow using these by passing
a button of 0 to gdk_window_begin_move/resize_drag.
fvwm seems to have problems keeping _NET_WORKAREA in sync with
the number of desktops. Instead of reading garbage, silently use
the full screen as workarea for desktops that are not covered
by the _NET_WORKAREA property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698248
Applications need a way to fix or adapt the decoration layout,
for situations like split header bars. Setting the layout from
the theme with a style property did not offer a good way to do
this, and the ::show-close-button property does not provide
fine-grained control.
To improve the situation, move the layout string to a property of
GtkHeaderBar which is backed by a setting. This allows platforms to
set a default button layout independent of the theme, while applications
can override the default.
The style GtkWindow style property is now deprecated and ignored.
And deprecate the X11-specific version of it.
We call this new API _set_shadow_width() and not _set_frame_extents()
because we already have a gdk_window_get_frame_extents() with a
different meaning and different type of value.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720374
The focus handling code is shared between core and XI2 implementations,
so just handle the extra XI2 types for passive grabs. Those must be dealt
with in the same way than active grabs. Focus events with this crossing
mode could happen currently through the XIGrabFocusIn passive grab.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719762
This fixes potential assertions if a GTK+ app gets to receive
a XINotifyPassiveGrab/Ungrab pointer crossing event, currently
triggerable by XIGrabEnter passive grabs.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719762
This is so we always have the latest information given by XRandR (or other), and not
rely on Core protocol information that might not have been updated yet.
This is specially visible when a monitor is connected (less frequent) or disconnected
(much more frequent), callbacks on GdkScreen::monitors-changed that call
gdk_screen_get_width/height() could get the screen size previous to the monitor
rearrangement.
So in order to fix this, keep track of the latest monitors information, and calculate
the bounding box in order to know the screen size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=715029
Scroll valuators were being just appended again and again, leading
to 1) a growing memory issue anytime a device changed 2) the first
scroll valuators to stay permanent on the application lifetime, as
the first stored valuators would always match.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705203
Passive grabs may take pointer focus out of the application, even though
the pointer didn't leave the window, but those events still trigger resetting
of the scroll axes. This is most visible with compiz, and possibly other
reparenting WMs, where passive grabs happen on the WM-managed window that
is a parent of the application toplevel.
As it is not possible to have scrolling happening on the timespan a passive
grab takes action, it is entirely safe for GTK+ to assume none happened if
it gets a crossing event of that nature.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574#c33
This information will be useful in case someone stumbles on a situation
similar to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574, so we can
figure out where do the crossing events come from or go to easily.
