char ** arrays are null-terminated everywhere, so make sure they are in
splice(), too.
Also fix the argument to be a const char * const * like in the
constructor.
Simplify all view model APIs and always return G_TYPE_OBJECT as the
item-type for every model.
It turns out nobody uses item-type anyway.
So instead of adding lots of APIs, forcing people to think about it and
trying to figure out how to handle filter or map models that modify item
types, just having an easy life is a better approach.
All the models need to be able to deal with any type of object going
through anyway.
Verify that the selection filter changes mirror
the selection changes of the underlying model,
as expected. These tests verify the fixes in
the previous commit.
One of the widget-factory focus tests is flaky in ci,
perhaps due to font changes causing size computations
to go slightly differently.
Drop this for now.
Always keep the order:
- [value]
- [marks.top]
- [marks.bottom]
- trough
Which makes sense given the rendering order. Slider should be drawn
after the marks.
Makes it possible to simply remove the custom snapshot implementations
in scale and range. And Adwaita does not depend on the node order
anyway.
In particular, track which items remain in ::items-changed
signal emissions.
But the main use case is sorting, which causes items-changed(0, n, n)
to be emitted.
In 99.9% of all cases, these are just NULL, NULL.
So just do away with these arguments, people can
use the setters for the rare cases where they want
the scrolled window to use a different adjustment.
This is a list model holding strings, initialized
from a char **. String lists are buildable as well,
and that replaces the buildable support in GktDropDowns.
This is not just about consistency with other functions.
It is about avoiding reentrancy problems.
GtkListBase first doing an unselect_all() will then force the
SelectionModel to consider a state where all items are unselected
(and potentially deciding to autoselect one) and then cause a
"selection-changed" emission that unselects all items and potentially
updates all the list item widgets in the GtkListBase to the unselected
state.
After this, GtkListBase selects new items, but to the SelectionModel and
the list item widgets this looks like an enitrely new operation and
there is no way to associate it with the previous state, so the
SelectionModel cannot undo any previous actions it took when
unselecting.
And all listitem widgets will now think they were just selected and
start running animations about selecting.
This is a selection model that stores the selection
state in a boolean property of the items, and thus
persists across reordering and similar changes.
Fixes: #2826
The tooltip handling in GtkWidget is "special":
- the string is stored inside the qdata instead of the private
instance data
- the accessors call g_object_set() and g_object_get(), and the
logic is all inside the property implementation, instead of
being the other way around
- the getters return a copy of the string
- the setters don't really notify all the involved properties
The GtkWidgetAccessible uses the (escaped) tooltip text as a source for
the accessible object description, which means it has to store the
tooltip inside the object qdata, and update its copy at construction and
property notification time.
We can simplify this whole circus by making the tooltip properties (text
and markup) more idiomatic:
- notify all side-effect properties
- return a constant string from the getter
- if tooltip-text is set:
- store the text as is
- escape the markup and store it separately for the markup getter
- if tooltip-markup is set:
- store the markup as is
- parse the markup and store it separately for the text getter
The part of the testtooltips interactive test that checks that the
getters are doing the right thing is now part of the gtk testsuite, so
we ensure we don't regress in behaviour.
When exclusive is TRUE, we would not always emit a
::selection-changed signal that covers all the items
that were unselected.
This commit includes a test.
This was done in a weird way where we always call reftest_uninhibit_snapshot()
on paint, and then re-inhibited it if it wasn't inhibited. To make this
work it also started with an extra inhibit.
This is very contorted and based on how this historically worked. This
changes it to just do:
if (inhibit_count > 0)
return;
And keep inhibit_count at its initial zero value unless it is actually
inhibited.
In https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/merge_requests/2027 i was getting
Bail out! ERROR:../testsuite/reftests/reftest-snapshot.c:212:reftest_uninhibit_snapshot: assertion failed: (inhibit_count > 0)
In (for example the box-shadow-changes-modify-clip reftest. I can reproduce this (on master) with:
```
$ xvfb-run -a -s "-screen 0 1024x768x24" meson test --suite gtk:reftest "reftest box-shadow-changes-modify-clip.ui"
...
1/1 gtk:reftest / reftest box-shadow-changes-modify-clip.ui ERROR 0.77s
``
Fix this by re-inhibiting if we didn't draw anything, or we will get an assert the next paint.
