When there's no useful shortcut accelerator set,
GtkShortcutLabel doesn't show any useful information.
To work around that, add a new property to set the
text to be displayed when there's no accelerator
available.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769205
GtkShortcutLabel is a widget that displays a single
shortcut accelerator or gesture in the user interface,
and is currently used by the shortcuts window.
This widget, however, has public value as other applications
also may want to expose their own shortcuts. For instance,
it'll be useful for the Keyboard panel on Control Center and
the new shortcut editor in Pitivi, among others.
This patch exposes GtkShortcutLabel as a public widget,
and adds the necessary documentation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769205
Scroll history must refer to a timespan for the values to be valid, otherwise
we return FALSE, in this case the stored event(s) should be discarded anyway.
It could be the case that the last scroll event is received long after any
previous scroll event, in this case the last scroll event discards all "old"
scroll events, and scroll_history_finish() returns FALSE because there's no
time/offset deltas in the scroll history.
This is desired so we don't trigger the deceleration effect if there was no
effective velocity, we still must reset the installed scroll cursor, so take
it out of this if() condition.
I thought I needed ot rearrange the ordering of the animation-direction
values for the parser, overlooking the fact that we already parse them
backwards to address this very problem.
It is important to know whether the returned object can or cannot
change, for a certain widget. For example to connect to the
GtkStyleContext::changed signal.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769047
Always return an error if we fail to get a dbus proxy; the callers
are only looking whether error is set, not whether the return value
is NULL.
Use the same function for the inhibit proxy as well, and clean up
the sm_proxy in finalize.
This matches the behaviour of Mutter, Metacity and traditional X11
window managers on the window manager side, and is what we want
for at least gnome-terminal. I can't think of any reason why we'd
want incremental resize in any other tiled window.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760944https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755947
Only update to using v2 headers/structs. The incompatible changes
to tool events are dealt with in the next commit. Pads aren't handled
in this commit either.
