The Wayland protocol does not share XI2's wealth of information
about individual devices, but it does provide discriminating
information about the source for scroll events. Pass this on to
the application by creating separate slave devices for these,
and setting them as source device on the scroll events.
These devices can be discriminated by their input-source property:
wheel - GDK_SOURCE_MOUSE
finger - GDK_SOURCE_TOUCHPAD
continuous - GDK_SOURCE_TRACKPOINT
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767093
fix up
Only generate crossing events on wl_touch.down for the virtual master
device used for touch events, and only whenever this virtual device
actually moves across surfaces. This behavior resembles better what is
expected in X11, where the pointer is warped to the touch position
on XITouchBegin.
This avoids the double emission of leave events when the pointer
emulating touch is lifted, that crossing event will be instead
generated when/if the focus surface changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766314
The wayland specification for discrete step information for scroll and
other axes reads:
| The discrete value carries the directional information. e.g. a
| value of -2 is two steps towards the negative direction of this axis.
mutter sets a value of 1 for SCROLL_DOWN events and -1 for SCROLL_UP
events.
gdkdevice Wayland backend does the opposite, it translates a positive
discrete value as SCROLL_UP and a negative value as SCROLL_DOWN, which
ends up inverting the scrolling direction.
Fix the logic in gdkdevice Wayland to use a positive value as
SCROLL_DOWN and a negative value as SCROLL_UP so that it matches mutter
and weston logic.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765907
NoSymbol is not a valid GDK symbol (it only has the concept of
VoidSymbol, for some reason, which is neither the same thing nor
produced by any sane keymap). Passing NoSymbol events through to GTK+
apps is unlikely to produce anything useful.
In particular, this meant VTE would scroll to the end of the buffer when
pressing Fn (required for Page Up/Down on Macs), as it was receiving a
keypress that wasn't a modifeir. This does not happen on X11, as the
KEY_FN keycode is above 255, so does not get sent to clients.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764825
We don't care about the specific (possibly client-side) window that
requested the focus here, only the toplevel. Fixes mistakenly sent
focus events when the grab happens inside the current focus window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762756
Always associate a drag context with a GdkDisplay and use that when
getting a cursor for a given action.
If we don't do this, dragging on a window that doesn't use the default
display will make us use cursors from the wrong display.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765565
The naming of pointers to GdkWaylandDisplay's were inconsistent.
Running the following commands in gtk+/gdk/wayland illustrate the
inconsistency:
$ grep -r '\<display_wayland\>' *.[ch] | wc -l
195
$ grep -r '\<wayland_display\>' *.[ch] | wc -l
81
This patch renames all occurrences of "wayland_display" to
"display_wayland". This is also consistent with naming in the X11
backend. A couple of whitespace changes were done as well in places
where the rename was already done, that added line breaks to long lines
that stood out.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765474
When synthesizing keyboard repeat, we can potentially drift further from
the mark depending on the timing of the frame callback and how long it
took to deliver the event.
This patch attempts to reduce this by tracking from a stable epoch the
time of our next keyboard repeat.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765567
Windows save in hardware_keycode an information which is not so low
level and some application require the hardware scancode.
As Windows provides this information save it in GdkEventPrivate
and provide a function to get this information.
For no Windows system the function return the hardware_keycode instead.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765259
If we get gdk_wayland_seat_flush_frame_event() with no previous event to be
flushed, we fallback into the scroll event checks. However, there's no check
performed there as to whether it really scrolled, so it'd always send a smooth
scroll event with 0/0 deltas in this case.
This should be mostly harmless, but still, we should only end up emitting scroll
events if those really happened.
The frame event is also meant to compress wl_pointer.leave events, at this
point the focus surface will be definitely NULL. In the end, wl_pointer.frame
should flush the last composed event despite the pointer focus.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765065
On wayland, such axes are per-tool, we must update device capabilities
on the fly as new tools enter proximity, first the slave device so
it matches the current tool, and then the master device so it looks
the same than the current slave device.
Only the management of tablets and tools is added so far. No tablet events
are yet interpreted.
As it's been the tradition in GTK+, erasers are split into their own device,
whereas the rest of the tools are meant to be routed through the
GDK_SOURCE_PEN device. Both pen/eraser devices are slaves to a master
pointer device, separate to wl_pointer's. This is so each tablet can
maintain its own cursor/positioning accounting.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Chandler Paul <thatslyude@gmail.com>
This will enable multiple "pointers" to have separate data here.
Will come out useful when adding support for tablets, as they
will have a separate cursor for all purposes.
Now that GdkWaylandDeviceData is gone, the functions prefixed
"gdk_wayland_device_" and taking a GdkWaylandSeat as first
parameter feel out of place. Renaming those makes it more obvious
that it's seat functions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763859
It's the same than gdk_device_get_seat() nowadays. Also, rename the
usages of GdkWaylandDeviceData to GdkWaylandSeat in the functions
affected by the removal.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763859
key repeat is handled client side, which means stalls in the compositor
dispatching key release events can lead to fictious repeat events.
This commit ties key repeat to a server roundtrip to ensure the client
and server are in sync.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757942
We don't need the key repeat rate or anything like that when
handling key up events, so do key up events first before querying
for that information.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757942
deliver_key_event is sometimes called from a timeout handler and
sometimes called directly. We currently erroneously return TRUE
(G_SOURCE_CONTINUE) in the case where it's called directly, but to
no ill effect, since we ignore that return value. In the future,
we're going to need to call it directly in other parts of the code
where the return value would be relevant and handling TRUE, would
require adding redundant code.
Instead, this commit just changes the code to always reset the timer
manually, and never rely on glib's ability to automatically reset
the timer by returning TRUE. This makes the code smaller, too, since
there's less special casing required.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757942
I am testing GTK+ master against mutter 3.19.90, so I'd
like GTK+ to survive even when the compositor does not
support the primary selection interface.
Implement it using the internal copy of the protocol. Otherwise,
we just deal with it the same than clipboard selection, just mapping
it to the PRIMARY atom instead of the CLIPBOARD one.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762561
If the grab window is destroyed the grab will be implicitly removed,
although we won't get GdkSeat:ungrab called in order to clear our
internal window<->seat relation entirely. Setting a weak ref will
nullify the pointer we keep on the seat to the window, avoiding the
expected crashes.
Due to implicit grabs, we basically can guarantee that the pointer
won't have any buttons pressed at the time of wl_pointer.enter.
Seems like a good place to unset any button modifiers that might
have been left stale by compositor grabs.
And use it to handle kinetic scrolling in the GtkScrolledWindow.
However, dropping the delta check causes the X11-based kinetic
scroll to break since we don't have the stop event here. Correct handling of
xf86-input-libinput-based scroll events is still being discussed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756729
This adds support for the new wl_pointer events available in v5.
The wl_pointer.axis_source events can be ignored for the purposes here, the
main reason they exist is so that the combination of axis_source=finger and
axis_stop triggers kinetic scrolling. We don't need to care about the source,
axis_stop is enough for us to tell us when we're scrolling.
The wl_pointer.frame events group events together and is intended as a
mechanism to coalesce events together. This for example allows us to now
send a single GTK scroll event for a diagonal scroll. Previously, the two
wl_pointer.axis events had to be handled separately.
The wl_pointer.axis_discrete event sends mouse wheel clicks where
appropriate, and is translated into up/down/left/right scroll events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756729
When a cursor is specified in gdk_seat_grab(), the cursor is reverted as
soon as the pointer enters or leaves another window.
To avoid this issue, store the grab cursor separately, so we force-apply
it in ::set_window_cursor(). Also, unset early the seat info from the
window on gdk_seat_ungrab(), so the next time switch_to_pointer_grab()
happens we end up picking the cursor set for the window underneath the
pointer window.
Based on a patch by Olivier Fourdan <ofourdan@redhat.com>.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760213
We no longer need a grabbed seat, instead we'll just use the default
seat if this happens, not without first warning and recommending
gdk_seat_grab() for the operation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759309
