Some windows, like GtkWindow and some other apps, set a transparent
background. The guarantee for begin_paint_region is that there should
be a full clear to the specified background color, not a composite
against what was there before.
This fixes repaint artifacts in Wayland and Weston in a better way than
76922c169f.
Slapping file:// in front of a path does not guarantee a working
uri (e.g. if you are on windows and the path looks like F:\\...).
Therefore, go back to using g_file_new_for_path if we don't have
to deal with a resource.
It turns out that activate-on-single-click interferes with the
expected multi-selection behavior. Turn it off, since there's nothing
to activate in this list, anyway.
The animated scrolling interferes with incremental validation.
As short-term solution, disable scrolling animation during
incremental validation. This is not a proper solution, but
it avoids broken behavior like scrollbars that are not reacting
to clicks. The problem was visible, e.g. in the list view
example in gtk3-demo.
The animated scrolling interferes with incremental validation.
As short-term solution, disable scrolling animation during
incremental validation. This is not a proper solution, but
it avoids broken behavior like scrollbars that are not reacting
to clicks. The problem was visible, e.g. in the list view
example in gtk3-demo.
gdk_x11_display_set_window_scale() affects the interpretation of the
Xft/DPI XSETTING - it is substituted inside GDK with the value of
Gdk/UnscaledDPI xsetting. However, this change is not propagated to
GTK+ and from GTK+ back to gdk_screen_set_resolution() until the
main loop is run.
Fix this by handling the screen resolution directly in gdk/x11.
This requires duplication of code between GDK and GTK+ since we still
have to handle DPI in GTK+ in the case that GdkSettings:gtk-xft-dpi
is set by the application.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733076
Conceptually, text handles are boxes, whose content is a 'handle',
so draw background, frame and handle. With this, and the previous
commit, the cursor-handle theming in Adwaita now works as intended.
The text handles reuse the style context from their parent widget,
and just add .cursor-handle. That means that the more specific
entry selectors override the .cursor-handle theming unless we
select for .entry.cursor-handle. We also need to work harder to
keep the .entry styling from drawing decorations around the outlines.
The listbox code relies on the container focus adjustment handling
to scroll the cursor row on screen. But GtkContainer has no idea
about row headers, so ensure that we scroll the header on screen too.
Use gtk_text_iter_set_line_offset (&tmp_iter, 0) instead of
gtk_text_iter_get_line(). The difference should not be big. In the first
case the line doesn't need to be traversed thanks to the offset 0. For
get_line(), the btree must be traversed.
A temporary iter is needed to not break the behavior. But the behavior
is quite strange, the function works directly on the iter passed as an
argument to the function, even if the function returns FALSE (not
found). So maybe a later commit will fix this strange behavior.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629129
find_by_log_attrs() was a recursive function. It is replaced by an
iteration.
The already_moved_initially parameter was TRUE only for the recursive
call, so the paramater is removed.
There is also a small cleanup of the find_visible_by_log_attrs()
(remove trailing spaces, fix indentation).
There is still a part to optimize for a later commit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629129
This is fallout from the recent dialog changes. We don't set the
headerbar as titlebar early enough anymore, so when the window title
gets set, it does not get passed on to the headerbar. So, re-set it
manually when the titlebar is put in place.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733099
This will let us theme activatable rows differently.
We also avoid emitting the ::row-activated signal for
rows that are not activatable. For compatibility reasons,
rows are activatable by default.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733112
