In https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601425 the annotations
were changed to int as they not only take the predefined enum values
but also user defined values registered through gtk_icon_size_register()
As a result the typelib doesn't contain any information about
GtkIconSize for those arguments and the Python docstring only
shows the corresponding Python type "int".
This changes the argument docs to mention the type explicitly
so the Python doc generator can add a link to Gtk.IconSize
which contains the most useful predefined values.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757411
(gnome-shell-extension-prefs:22382): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid cast from 'GtkInvisible' to 'GtkWindow'
(gnome-shell-extension-prefs:22382): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_window_set_transient_for: assertion 'parent == NULL || GTK_IS_WINDOW (parent)' failed
#1 0x00007fffeeb81a12 in g_log (log_domain=log_domain@entry=0x7fffeeea3464 "GLib-GObject", log_level=log_level@entry=G_LOG_LEVEL_WARNING, format=format@entry=0x7fffeeeaa878 "invalid cast from '%s' to '%s'") at gmessages.c:1079
#2 0x00007fffeee9c2a9 in g_type_check_instance_cast (type_instance=0xb314c0, iface_type=iface_type@entry=9020048) at gtype.c:4021
#3 0x00007ffff0a06e25 in gtk_tooltip_set_last_window (tooltip=tooltip@entry=0xbb8c10, window=<optimized out>) at gtktooltip.c:910
#4 0x00007ffff0a08dfd in _gtk_tooltip_handle_event (event=event@entry=0xbf72c0) at gtktooltip.c:1538
#5 0x00007ffff090d7a9 in gtk_main_do_event (event=0xbf72c0) at gtkmain.c:1785
#6 0x00007ffff0496ab2 in gdk_event_source_dispatch (source=<optimized out>, callback=<optimized out>, user_data=<optimized out>) at gdkeventsource.c:364
#7 0x00007fffeeb7a8c3 in g_main_dispatch (context=0x807300) at gmain.c:3067
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736131
The toplevel_window was never set, and the only place where it
was used was causing us to hide tooltips needlessly. So removing
it is a double win.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733321
When placing tooltips, the csd shadow will get 'pushed up' and
may end up underneath the pointer. We don't want this to cause
the tooltip to be hidden, because that leads to flickering, so
ignore the shadow when finding the widget under the pointer.
This is old code from dating back many years. Nowadays, we can
just use css drawing and csd windows to achieve much the same
effect.
Themes will need some adjustment for this change.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731187
When showing a tooltip on the edge of a monitor, the tooltip could be wrongly
placed and be shown going from one monitor to the next.
This happened because the current_window wasn't set visible, and when it wasn't
the returned allocated size would be 1, hence wrong calculations.
Signed-off-by: Olivier Brunel <jjk@jjacky.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698730
Usually, educated GtkContainers' forall() implementation returns children
in an order that's safe for the default draw() implementation in GtkContainer.
So for widgets with some stacking notions (eg. GtkOverlay),
_gtk_widget_find_at_coords() needs to recurse within containers in reverse
order so it finds the topmost widget.
As this function is used in both tooltips and DnD code, this improves behavior
of "floating" widgets wrt those two. This could for example be seen in the
"Transparent" GTK+ demo, where dropping text on the entry results on the text
going to the textview.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699239
In particular gtksettings.h and gtkstylecontext.h needed to be included
in lots of places now.
Also, I order the includes alphabetically in a bunch of headers.
If we get a composited-changed signal before the tooltip is ever realized we
have nothing to do.
This actually prevents a segfault in maybe_update_shape() because calling
gtk_widget_get_window() on a non-realized widget returns NULL.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662467
Rounded corners now will always work, using XShape in case we're not
running a composite manager.
Also, setting an RGBA visual (if available) on the tooltip toplevel
enables them to be transparent if the theme specifies so.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=599617
