The extra condition here that caused the current child to
not redraw during reordering was introduced in f383e1f1
during the port to ::draw, but was not explained in the
commit message, and removing it has no obvious negative
effect.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730767
Try to do a better job of keeping example content
from being too wide. It is often rendered as <pre>
text so the only time we can wrap it is in the source.
It is best to full break lines at all punctuation and
to try to keep the width under 70 chars or so.
Add a has-tab-gap style property to GtkNotebook so that we can
disable drawing the gap between tabs and the page in the Adwaita
theme without breaking existing themes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707920
And use the "header" style class to do that.
This allows themes to set e.g. the background of the tab header
differently.
Themes will need slight adjustment to make things appear
as before.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643914
Attached widgets inherit from the style of the widget they are
attached to. This can sometimes have unintended consequences,
like a context menu in the main view of gedit inheriting the font
that is configured for documents, or the context menu of the preview
in the font chooser coming up with humongous font size.
To fix this problem, we introduce a context menu style class
and use it for all menus that are used like that. The theme
can then set a font for this style class.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697127
When trying to drag, we currently the position of the first motion
event to determine where the drag came from. This might be alright
in the case of the old animation, but the data will be inaccurate
if the user has moved the pointer quite a bit since pressing the
cursor to start dragging. While we could monkey patch the GdkEvent
at the widget layer, this is unintuitive and strange.
Add a new API that takes a set of pointer coordinates describing
the origin of the drag. Additionally, adapt most widgets to use
it and use it with correct coordinates.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705605
This avoids an evil trap when doing MAX (..., ... - 2 * border_width)
and the expression on the right gets promoted to unsigned, instead
of going negative as you would expect.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699633
This replaces the previously hardcoded calls to gdk_window_set_user_data,
and also lets us track which windows are a part of a widget. Old code
should continue working as is, but new features that require the
windows may not work perfectly.
We need this for the transparent widget support to work, as we need
to specially mark the windows of child widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
The GtkNotebook drag-motion event handler may install a timeout when
hovering over a tab, in order to switch to it.
On the other hand it's desirable for applications to use the empty tab
area as a drop target, so the drag-motion handler returns FALSE
(also in case it installs the switch tab timeout), as explained in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=350665.
Unfortunately, applications can use the tab label widget (or a child
of it) as a different drop target area, and install their own
drag-motion handler there.
In this scenario, the timeout will still be installed by GtkNotebook's
handler, but since it returns FALSE, it will never get the matching
drag-leave event, causing it to trigger also when the mouse pointer
moved elsewhere before it expired.
Fix this by returning TRUE from drag-motion when the event is over a
tab. Note that this makes automatic tab switching not work anymore when
drag and drop is handled in the tab label widget; applications are
expected to also handle tab switching if desired in such a case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684415
When the tab label gets removed from the notebook on widget
desctruction, we should still unconditionally unparent it from the
notebook, since failing to do so will keep a stray reference alive.
In case applications rely on the tab label being destroyed to release
other references (e.g. because the tab label is a custom object, or
another object's lifecycle is tied to it using g_object_set_data_full()),
this will also possibly cause other references to get leaked.
In Nautilus, the result was we were failing to release the reference to
a NautilusWindowSlot, and other parts of the application relied
on it being destroyed at a specific time instead, causing the
application to crash when closing a window.
This is a regression from commit
325cf071d1.
This commit restores the previous unparenting behavior in case we're not
in a DnD operation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680349
When using Shift-Tab to move the focus out of page content onto
the tab label, we end up in a situation where both Tab and Shift-Tab
move focus back into the page, which is not really what is expected
when the notebook is part of a dialog.
Instead, arrange things so that using Shift-Tab with focus on a
tab label moves the focus out of the notebook.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669986
It turns out that we can end up removing a notebook child while
the tab is still 'detached'. Child removal causes
gtk_notebook_remove_tab_label() to be called on the tab label,
but that function did not deal with the eventuality that the tab
label may be a child of the dnd window.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677943
