Add a new ::measure vfunc similar to GtkCssGadget's that widget
implementations have to override instead of the old get_preferred_width,
get_preferred_height, get_preferred_width_for_height,
get_preferred_height_for_width and
get_preferred_height_and_baseline_for_width.
Use .marks-before/after to indicate the presence of marks.
As Lapo points out, compatibility with the previous names
is not really that important, since everything else changed
around it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766440
It turns out that it is too hard (and in some cases, impossible)
to get this information from node positioning, so bring back the
.scale-has-marks-above/below style classes on the main node.
This should allow us to fix the 'pointy sliders'.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766440
We're measuring both the width of the minimal and the maximal value for
the value gadget, but only give the value the minimal width for its
current value, resultnig in an always left-aligned value.
Fix this by assigning the width of the value gadget to the value layout
and letting pango align the text inside the layout.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766120
if (orientation) doesn't make a lot of sense but C doesn't complain and
instead evaluates orientation to TRUE for GTK_ORIENTATION_VERTICAL
(since that's 1), thus inverting the value sizes.
And add a default color like it was before.
This also fixes other issues with scale values interacting with scale
mark labels, which were buggy at least since 3.18.
The way this method is used from the GtkRange subclasses doesn't really
work well when the slider properties change as a consequence of e.g. a
style class being applied (e.g. the fine-tune style class).
In fact, there's no need to read the minimum slider size out of band,
and we can obtain the same result in a way that always work by setting a
private property on GtkRange.
Try harder not to push the scale out of balance by marks. With
this change, the remaining difference in the drawing is down
to asymmetric assets and margins coming out of the theme.
To fully support such asymmetric rendering, we need implement
baseline alignment for scales.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749650
We don't want scale marks to affect scale sizing and positioning,
so draw them inside the range recangle. This avoids size changes
for marks that don't have labels, at least.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749650
Instead of issuing g_warning, fill the provided GError.
This lets us test this error handling, and is the right
thing to do. Use the new GtkBuilder helpers and
g_markup_collect_attributes to do so.
We've recently a number of classes wholly. For these cases,
move the headers and sources to gtk/deprecated/ and adjust
Makefiles and includes accordingly.
Affected classes:
GtkAction
GtkActionGroup
GtkActivatable
GtkIconFactory
GtkImageMenuItem
GtkRadioAction
GtkRecentAction
GtkStock
GtkToggleAction
GtkUIManager
Pointed out in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699016
The fix here is slightly different. We make
_gtk_builder_parser_translate return a const char * instead of
a dup'ed string, and fix up the callers.
Problem pointed out by Stefan Sauer in bug 667598. The solution
here is different from his patch. We always draw marks in increasing
direction, and flip the marks and stop positions to match.
The GtkScaleMark values are gdouble, a simple a-b compare func would fail for
values with the same integer value. This breaks the sorting and causes random
marker label placement.
If the scale has an origin (it will have one by default), GtkRange will
render the two sides before/after the current value with different style
classes, making it possible for themes to use different colors and
properties for the two areas.
This was possible in GTK 2 with style details, but got lost during the
road to 3.0.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665140
Stop documenting the base class as just a base class for the
H and V specializations, copying the useful descriptions from
those H/V classes to the base class. Do not advise the use of
the H/V classes or refer to them unnecessarily.
This is in preparation for making scale marks styling better.
As a side-effect, TOP and LEFT position are treated the same now,
as well as BOTTOM and RIGHT.
Based on a patch by Bastien Nocera,
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643685
The keysyms create a lot of potential namespace conflicts for
C, and are especially problematic for introspection, where we take
constants into the namespace, so GDK_Display conflicts with GdkDisplay.
For C application compatiblity, add gdkkeysyms-compat.h which uses
the old names.
Just one user in GTK+ continues to use gdkkeysyms-compat.h, which is
the gtkimcontextsimple.c, since porting that requires porting more
custom Perl code.
This commit adds constructors for GtkPaned, GtkBox, GtkButtonBox,
GtkRuler, GtkScale, GtkScrollbar and GtkSeparator and makes these
types instantiable.
This commit was created using a script that searched for all docstrings
containing a parameter and the string 'or %NULL'.
Gdk backends and demos excluded as they are not part of a public API
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=610474
Bug 565656 – Add marks to scales
* gtk/gtkrange.[hc]: Add internal api to define 'stop values'
that have a little resistance when dragging the slider over it.
* gtk/gtk.symbols:
* gtk/gtkscale.[hc] (gtk_scale_add_mark): New function to add
a 'mark' to a scale, which will draws a tick, plus optionally
some text, and makes the value a stop value.
(gtk_scale_clear_values): Removes all marks.
* tests/testscale.c: Test for marks on scales
* tests/Makefile.am: Integrate it
svn path=/trunk/; revision=22149
2008-11-11 Michael Natterer <mitch@imendio.com>
Bug 553765 – Add orientation API to GtkRange
* gtk/gtkrange.[ch]: implement the GtkOrientable interface. Add
evil code that makes sure that the stepper_detail and slider_detail
set in GtkRangeClass continue to work with the hacked subclasses
below.
* gtk/gtkscale.[ch]: swallow all code from GtkHScale and GtkVScale
and add gtk_scale_new() and gtk_scale_new_with_range() which take
a GtkOrientation argument. Set slider_detail to "Xscale" so above
evil code works.
* gtk/gtkscrollbar.[ch]: add gtk_scrollbar_new() which takes a
GtkOrientation argument. Set stepper_detail to "Xscrollbar" so
above evil code works.
* gtk/gtkhscale.c
* gtk/gtkvscale.c
* gtk/gtkhscrollbar.c
* gtk/gtkvscrollbar.c: remove all code except the constructor and
call gtk_orientable_set_orientation() in init().
* gtk/gtk.symbols: changed accordingly.
svn path=/trunk/; revision=21779
2008-08-12 Michael Natterer <mitch@imendio.com>
* gtk/*.c: consistently chain up using
GTK_FOO_CLASS(parent_class)->bar(instance) instead of
(*GTK_FOO_CLASS(parent_class))->bar(instance).
svn path=/trunk/; revision=21085
2008-06-30 Cody Russell <bratsche@gnome.org>
* Practically everything changed.
Change all references of GIMP Toolkit (and variations of it)
to GTK+ Toolkit, showing no mercy at all to our beloved
ancestry. (#540529)
svn path=/trunk/; revision=20709
2005-11-28 Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>
* gtk/gtkscale.c (_gtk_scale_format_value): Insert an LRM, to prevent
-20 to come out as 20- in RTL locales. (#322571, Tze'ela Hebron)
