Remove a boatload of "or %NULL" from nullable parameters
and return values. gi-docgen generates suitable text from
the annotation that we don't need to duplicate.
This adds a few missing nullable annotations too.
The script assumes that the git program is in the PATH which may not be always
the case, so if git was not found, fallback to the former behavior of making
VCS_TAG an empty string if the profile option was not set to 'devel'.
Also fix the call to the script so that we do indeed call GIT on the source GIT
repo so that we can get the right short SHA1 sum.
Re-organize the code a bit in the process, so that things seem cleaner.
We iterate here from the target widget up the toplevel checking
for the previous and new grab, there's however 2 bugs here:
- The check for is_shadowed was different to the check for was_shadowed
- The loop started with the assumption that the widgets did not hold
a grab, just to change it if the grab widget was found. (or maybe
it's the other way around? it's unclear with the differing checks
for past/present state).
Make these checks consistent, and ensure we start with the right
assumption for the past/present grabbing state, and accounting that
new/old grab widgets may or may not be part of the pick stack.
With gtk_grab_notify_foreach() just taking care of emitting crossing
notifications due to the GTK grab change, rename it to a more apt
gtk_synthesize_grab_crossing().
The _gtk_widget_grab_notify() function just (maybe) did a) reset
controllers and b) hide toplevels. The second part was a testing
remnant introduced in commit 024d832d94, not part of the original
fix.
Do the former more concisely, called from the place where we figure
out whether a widget's ability to receive events changed due to
GTK grabs. It's across those changes that we are interested in
resetting the controllers.
With the gestures being reset both ways, GtkWindowHandle (and
probably other) gestures are now able to reset after a GTK grab
takes input away (e.g. GtkMenuButton). This could be seen as
a sudden jump the next time they'd be dragged with the mouse,
as the gesture would "resume" the previous interaction.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3942
When a new sequence is added to a GtkGesture, its state is looked
in other gestures in the same group, and made to match in this
gesture. This however happened a bit too early, before the
gesture touchpoint was fully set up. As this may result in signal
emission and whatnot, it's a good idea to make it happen with a
fully set up touchpoint.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3946
