This may ensure that the dialog is actually done initializing. We need to kill this
sleeping business and really use signals, sigh...
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
This ensures that data maintained by the button while the dialog opens/closes remains consistent.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
We can't safely examine allocations synchronously using
gtk_main_iteration(), as there might be not enough time for a new paint
clock tick to have expired and the allocation set on the widget.
Work this around adding g_usleep() calls before processing pending
mainloop events.
These are generic tests that can test the button in all of its modes,
instead of hand-written tests for each combination.
Some tests fail currently.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
This code came from a home-grown testing mechanism, which didn't aggregate tests
into a test suite; it just ran them one by one. Here we move some of that machinery
to GTestDataFunc for more flexibility in running tests.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
The bitmasks with the 31st, 32nd and 63rd bit set are added. The make up
the largest bitmasks on 32bit/64bit that can be represented without
allocating and the smallest bitmask on 32bit that must be allocated.
I'm adding a bunch of fixes for gcc complaining about
-Wmissing-declarations after finding a bunch of cases today where I
had forgotten to make functions static in the CSS code.
This patch fixes the tests in gtk/tests.
After this last patch, the gtk/ subdir should now compile without
warnings when this flag is enabled.
These need to be made independent of the xkb configuration somehow.
As things are now, they will either fail when run on a naked X
server in make check, or fail when run in my session.
This does nothing but turn all GtkBitmask functions into static inline
functions that call the gtk_allocated_bitmask_*() equivalent.
The implementation of the static functions has also been put into a
private header, to not scare people who want to see how things are
implemented.
When using GtkTreeStore, don't compute row positions assuming
everything's a list store, which is how get_row_start_for_index() works.
So instead, do a laxer check and don't insist on proper alignment.
When parsing GMenu xml, use the facility for pick up named submenus.
Note that <section id='foo'>...</section> is _not_ a named submenu.
It is a named item with an unnamed submenu :-(
This makes GtkBuilder accept a GMenuMarkup tree at the toplevel
(ie with <menu id='foo'> being a child of <interface>) and the resulting
GMenu object can be obtained via gtk_builder_get_object (builder, "foo").
