Clarify that ::destroy, not ::hide*, removes a window from its app, by
replacing the mention of open windows with the blurb on destruction from
:application, completing commit 7db4bee4b6
Also link to the equivalent gtk_application_(add|remove)_window() calls,
since Application.add_window() already links back to Window:application.
* unless you use gtkmm…
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639931
It was never unref()d, either when replacing the existing GObject in
set_property(), cleaning up in finalize(), or becoming a placeholder.
Fix by using g_set_object() and g_clear_object() to unref as needed.
This also drops the check that the newly set object is a valid cloud
provider account, as we don’t do the equivalent for any of the other
object-typed properties, and Carlos didn’t think this was important.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787600
The focus outline disappeared as the colour of the swatch got close to
the normal focus outline colour, which is alpha(currentColor, 0.3).
Fix by making the outline an alpha’d version of the tick colour, but
more opaque than normal outlines. 0.6 seems good enough; feel free to
improve it, but at least this ensures the outline can’t vanish anymore.
HighContrast achieves this already because it applies the color property
to the main node, not the overlay. Doing that means the outline is fully
opaque, which is fine for HC obviously but was excessive for Adwaita.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787757
It used $text_color unconditionally, but in :dark, text is white, so we
overlaid a white tick on any light colours, all the way to white itself.
Using these named colours doesn’t make practical or semantic sense.
Instead, use white/black over dark/light swatches, as in HC, so all
variant–swatch combos work. Light looks the same, & :dark works now.
For backdrop, use alpha 0.5, unlike 0.7 in HC, as that seemed excessive
& different from the current effect. 0.5 is almost identical to how
$backdrop_fg_colour is a 50% mix of $fg_color, & matches backdrop text.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787531
along the orthogonal orientation. It seems a FlowBox on its own can only
handle being shrunk along its main orientation. The orthogonal requests
a huge min size – reserving what it would need if the main orientation
got its min size, which would flow all children in 1 line orthogonally.
Adding it to a ScrolledWindow (any policy) enables free shrinking, so
size_allocate() can reflow how users in this situation probably expect.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787021
Without specifically connecting ::delete-event to something, the dialog
will be destroyed when it is closed, for example by pressing Esc. This
meant that when dismissing it this way, unlike by pressing Cancel, any
custom palette would be lost when the dialog was next opened, and so on.
Resolve this by making ::delete-event just do GTK_RESPONSE_CANCEL, so
closing the dialog has the same effect as clicking its Cancel button.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787444
As reported in https://github.com/ibus/ibus/issues/1944,
typing u201e while holding Ctrl+Shift used to give a „
when letting go of Ctrl+Shift. This broke when we introduced
Ctrl+Shift+e to start Emoji sequences. Fix this by only
looking for Ctrl+Shift+e if we are not already in a hex
sequence.
Only HighContrast has a clear problem, and this avoids some probably
unwanted changes of certain colours in the weird greyscale emoji I have
available to test here.
On button release, we were popping down if the event widget was anything
but priv->button. This broke scrolling by clicking a mouse button, i.e.
when releasing a click in the trough or finishing a drag of either bar.
That’s unexpected, inconvenient, and pointless. So, let’s stop doing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738893
We were only selecting a section’s button if the adjustment y coord was
within its heading, so scrolling slightly into it unchecked all buttons.
This also fixes how we could end up with the first 2 selected, somehow.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787172
Nice try, but size groups don't work with invisible widgets anyway.
Invisible widgets request 0×0.
[reapplying after accidental reintroduction in the cloudproviders patch;
see https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786123#c39]
Use opacity to differentiate unselected/hovered/selected buttons. It had
assumed bg < border < fg colours, which may be false, as in Adwaita:dark
This also means we do not need to special-case for the backdrop state.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786956
in a specific case, which was applying .slider as a class on the parent
switch, instead of correctly selecting on its child node named slider.
This makes the border on the outside of a switch in a selected listbox
row look better in the light variant. Since the code was never removed,
it was clearly meant to work, and making it work is a clear improvement.
The emoji chooser gets disposed already, because it is attached
to the toplevel as a popover. Doing it again when the object data
is cleared is leading to a crash.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787103
• Use disconnect_by_data() to catch both _adjustment_changed() and now
_adjustment_value_changed(), as the latter had been missed until now.
• Also disconnect from indicator_value_changed(), which was not done in
destroy() due to indicator_reset() and remove_indicator() disagreeing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775074
