This is kind of a hack to get rid of infinite loops that occur when
child accessibles try to set their parent upon creation but the parent
accessible creates its children in the initialize vfunc. Because in that
case, the parent will not have an accessible set when the child tries to
access it, because it is still initializing itself. Which will cause a
new accessible to be created.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660687
Add enum GdkModifierIntent which identifies use cases for modifier masks
and GdkKeyMap::get_modifier_mask(). Add a default implementation which returns
what is currently hardcoded all over GTK+, and an implementation in the
quartz backend. Also add gtk_widget_get_modifier_mask() which simplifies
things by doing widget->display->keymap->get_modifier_mask().
This commit introduces a new setting, gtk-visible-focus, backed
by the Gtk/VisibleFocus X setting. Its three values control how
focus rectangles are displayed.
'always' is equivalent to the traditional GTK+ behaviour of always
rendering focus rectangles.
'never' does what it says, and is intended for keyboardless
situations, e.g. tablets.
'automatic' hides focus rectangles initially, until the user
interacts with the keyboard, at which point focus rectangles
become visible.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649567
We want the role to be kept in the accessible object. Using
gtk_widget_class_set_accessible_role() is only meant as a quick
workaround to requiring subclassing of the accessibles in the quite
common case where a subclass does not change the accessible
implementation at all and only has a different role.
The function is supposed to bypass the ATK registry. For 2 reasons:
1) We get rid of a lot of boilerplate madness.
2) The registry allows creating multiple accessibles per widget and we
don't.
The old code for registries is still there.
Doing it unconditionally is not useful when the subclasses actually
using them can only ever do it in the style_updated signal. So do it in
the style_updated handler instead.
Include the child widget path in the returned path now. This allows
customizing the path of the current widgets - like adding flags to child
widgets (and maybe siblings in the future).
This is a variant of gtk_widget_child_notify() that takes an
explicit container, instead of relying on widget->parent to
be the correct container to use.
Also print the parent widget. As the parent's size_allocate
implementation is usually the culprit for this warning happening, it
makes sense to print it.
Mnemonics for characters that go beyond the baseline (q, y, g) were not
being shown, because they are drawn outside of the label's allocated
size.
This patch just disables the clip-to-size for labels, so that the label
can draw outsize of its allocation. In most cases, that works around
this bug.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=648570
Instead rely on state_flags & GTK_STATE_FLAG_INSENSITIVE to tell us if a
widget is sensitive.
This has the huge benefit that the way the widget is actually rendered
corresponds to the return value of gtk_widget_is_sensitive().
As a side effect, we do not ever allow unsetting the
GTK_STATE_FLAG_INSENSITIVE for a widget the is set to not be sensitive
(via gtk_widget_set_sensitive()). This way we stop propagation of making
stuff sensitive at insensitive widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642918
This commit makes GTK_ALIGN_START/_END pay attention to
the text direction when used in horizontal context.
This is how similar parameters in GtkMisc and GtkAlignment work,
and is generally expected of GTK+ positioning parameters. And this
is new GTK+ 3 api, so it is basically still unused at this point.
If explicit right/left turn out to be needed at some point, we
can expand the enumeration with new values.
This ensures that widgets that aren't ported and rely on the style-set
signal being emitted work as well as before. They should not rely on
style-set being emitted however.
Note that this function is a no-op if the initial style has been set
already and is very cheap if it has not been set yet. It only becomes
relevant if the resulting style actually gets used.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639584
