The visuals are typically sorted by some sort of "most useful first"
order. And picking the last one is likely to give us the weirdest
matching glx visual.
Commits 314b6abbe8 and eb9223c008 were ignoring
the fact that the code where found is set to 1 was modifying
col - which was an ok thing to do when that part of the code
was still breaking out of the loop, but it is no longer doing
that (since 2003 !). Fix things up by storing the final col
value in a separate variable and using that after the loop.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738886
Its not really reasonable to handle failures to make_current, it
basically only happens if you pass invalid arguments to it, and
thats not something we trap on similar things on the X drawing side.
If GL is not supported that should be handled by the context creation
failing, and anything going wrong after that is essentially a critical
(or an async X error).
We make user facing gl contexts not attached to a surface if possible,
or attached to dummy surfaces. This means nothing can accidentally
read/write to the toplevel back buffer.
This adds the new type GdkGLContext that wraps an OpenGL context for a
particular native window. It also adds support for the gdk paint
machinery to use OpenGL to draw everything. As soon as anyone creates
a GL context for a native window we create a "paint context" for that
GdkWindow and switch to using GL for painting it.
This commit contains only an implementation for X11 (using GLX).
The way painting works is that all client gl contexts draw into
offscreen buffers rather than directly to the back buffer, and the
way something gets onto the window is by using gdk_cairo_draw_from_gl()
to draw part of that buffer onto the draw cairo context.
As a fallback (if we're doing redirected drawing or some effect like a
cairo_push_group()) we read back the gl buffer into memory and composite
using cairo. This means that GL rendering works in all cases, including
rendering to a PDF. However, this is not particularly fast.
In the *typical* case, where we're drawing directly to the window in
the regular paint loop we hit the fast path. The fast path uses opengl
to draw the buffer to the window back buffer, either by blitting or
texturing. Then we track the region that was drawn, and when the draw
ends we paint the normal cairo surface to the window (using
texture-from-pixmap in the X11 case, or texture from cairo image
otherwise) in the regions where there is no gl painted.
There are some complexities wrt layering of gl and cairo areas though:
* We track via gdk_window_mark_paint_from_clip() whenever gtk is
painting over a region we previously rendered with opengl
(flushed_region). This area (needs_blend_region) is blended
rather than copied at the end of the frame.
* If we're drawing a gl texture with alpha we first copy the current
cairo_surface inside the target region to the back buffer before
we blend over it.
These two operations allow us full stacking of transparent gl and cairo
regions.
Before 5e325c4, the default BitGravity was NorthWestGravity.
When static gravities were removed in 5e325c4, the BitGravity regressed
to the X11 default, Forget. Forget causes giant graphical glitches and
black flashes when resizing, especially in some environments that aren't
synchronized to a paint clock yet, like XWayland.
I'm assuming that the author assumed that the default of BitGravity was
NorthWestGravity, which is the default of WinGravity. Just go ahead and
fix this regression to make resizing look smooth again.
Remove checks for NULL before g_free() and g_clear_object().
Merge check for NULL, freeing of pointer and its setting
to NULL by g_clear_pointer().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733157
The warning may have had some value at some point, but if
people uninstall large icons just to make the warning go
away, it does more harm than good. So just remove it.
If we have a fullscreen window that covers a monitor, desktop
chrome is not relevant for placing of menus and other popups.
Therefore, return the full monitor geometry instead of the
workarea in this case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737251
gdk_x11_display_set_window_scale() affects the interpretation of the
Xft/DPI XSETTING - it is substituted inside GDK with the value of
Gdk/UnscaledDPI xsetting. However, this change is not propagated to
GTK+ and from GTK+ back to gdk_screen_set_resolution() until the
main loop is run.
Fix this by handling the screen resolution directly in gdk/x11.
This requires duplication of code between GDK and GTK+ since we still
have to handle DPI in GTK+ in the case that GdkSettings:gtk-xft-dpi
is set by the application.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733076
Traditionally, the way painting was done in GTK+ was with the
"expose-event" handler, where you'd use GDK methods to do drawing on
your surface. In GTK+ 2.24, we added cairo support with gdk_cairo_create,
so you could paint your graphics with cairo.
Since then, we've added client-side windows, double buffering, the paint
clock, and various other enhancements, and the modern way to do drawing
is to connect to the "draw" signal on GtkWidget, which hands you a
cairo_t. To do double-buffering, the cairo_t we hand you is actually on
a secret surface, not the actual backing store of the window, and when
the draw handler completes we blit it into the main backing store
atomically.
The code to do this is with the APIs gdk_window_begin_paint_region,
which creates the temporary surface, and gdk_window_end_paint which
blits it back into the backing store. GTK+'s implementation of the
"draw" signal uses these APIs.
We've always sort-of supported people calling gdk_cairo_create
"outside" of a begin_paint / end_paint like old times, but then you're
not getting the benefit of double-buffering, and it's harder for GDK to
optimize.
Additionally, newer backends like Mir and Wayland can't actually support
this model, since they're based on double-buffering and swapping buffers
at various points in time. If we hand you a random cairo_t, we have no
idea when is a good time to swap.
Remove support for this.
This is technically a GDK API break: a warning is added in cases where
gdk_cairo_create is called outside of a paint cycle, and the returned
surface is a dummy that won't ever be composited back onto the main
surface. Testing with complex applications like Ardour didn't produce
any warnings.
This avoids a bunch of policy problems with deciding how to lay
out the window menu under different WMs.
For now, we use the special event _GTK_SHOW_WINDOW_MENU, but we
hope to have this standardized in wm-spec quite soon, as KDE wants
it as well.
It seems that some backends implemented get_root_origin wrong
and returned the client window coordinates, not the frame window
coordinates. Since it's possible to implement generically for all
windows, let's do that instead of having a separate impl vfunc.
And the counterpart to unmaximize when dragging a maximized window, if
touch devices aren't going to use EWMH moveresize, having this one at least
makes things feel a bit less awkward.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709914
Sadly, EWMH moveresize mechanism can't work with touch devices for two
reasons:
1) As a mutter implementation detail, the device is queried in order
to check whether the dragging button is still pressed. Touch devices
won't report the button 1 being pressed through pointer emulation.
2) Even bypassing that check, on X11 touch events are selected prior
to sequences being started, either through XISelectEvents or
XIGrabTouchBegin, no late registering through active grabs is allowed,
as WMs do on reaction to EWMH moveresize messages.
So for the time being, make touch devices fallback on emulated window
dragging, which at least allows for moving windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709914
We have a hack in the XSETTINGS code to substitute gtk-xft-dpi
with gdk-unscaled-dpi unless the screen has a fixed window scale,
in which case we just use gtk-xft-dpi.
But if the screen is changed to have a fixed window scale, then
the substituted value of gdk-unscaled-dpi will stick around until
the next (coincidental) change to XSETTINGS. To fix this, force
an immediate reread of the XSETTINGS property when
gdk_x11_display_set_window_scale() is used.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725754
Instead of destroying the surface in the backend if this is
unable to resize, let the core code do it, and do it properly.
Based on a patch by Benjamin Otte.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725172
This setting will let us keep traditional appearance
of dialogs on platforms where this is expected.
The new setting is called gtk-dialogs-use-header, backed
by the Gtk/DialogsUseHeader xsetting.
The EWMH defines _NET_WM_MOVERESIZE_SIZE_KEYBOARD and
_NET_WM_MOVERESIZE_MOVE_KEYBOARD for operations that are not
initiated by a button-press event. Allow using these by passing
a button of 0 to gdk_window_begin_move/resize_drag.
fvwm seems to have problems keeping _NET_WORKAREA in sync with
the number of desktops. Instead of reading garbage, silently use
the full screen as workarea for desktops that are not covered
by the _NET_WORKAREA property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=698248
Applications need a way to fix or adapt the decoration layout,
for situations like split header bars. Setting the layout from
the theme with a style property did not offer a good way to do
this, and the ::show-close-button property does not provide
fine-grained control.
To improve the situation, move the layout string to a property of
GtkHeaderBar which is backed by a setting. This allows platforms to
set a default button layout independent of the theme, while applications
can override the default.
The style GtkWindow style property is now deprecated and ignored.
And deprecate the X11-specific version of it.
We call this new API _set_shadow_width() and not _set_frame_extents()
because we already have a gdk_window_get_frame_extents() with a
different meaning and different type of value.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720374
The focus handling code is shared between core and XI2 implementations,
so just handle the extra XI2 types for passive grabs. Those must be dealt
with in the same way than active grabs. Focus events with this crossing
mode could happen currently through the XIGrabFocusIn passive grab.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719762
This fixes potential assertions if a GTK+ app gets to receive
a XINotifyPassiveGrab/Ungrab pointer crossing event, currently
triggerable by XIGrabEnter passive grabs.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719762
This is so we always have the latest information given by XRandR (or other), and not
rely on Core protocol information that might not have been updated yet.
This is specially visible when a monitor is connected (less frequent) or disconnected
(much more frequent), callbacks on GdkScreen::monitors-changed that call
gdk_screen_get_width/height() could get the screen size previous to the monitor
rearrangement.
So in order to fix this, keep track of the latest monitors information, and calculate
the bounding box in order to know the screen size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=715029
Scroll valuators were being just appended again and again, leading
to 1) a growing memory issue anytime a device changed 2) the first
scroll valuators to stay permanent on the application lifetime, as
the first stored valuators would always match.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705203
Passive grabs may take pointer focus out of the application, even though
the pointer didn't leave the window, but those events still trigger resetting
of the scroll axes. This is most visible with compiz, and possibly other
reparenting WMs, where passive grabs happen on the WM-managed window that
is a parent of the application toplevel.
As it is not possible to have scrolling happening on the timespan a passive
grab takes action, it is entirely safe for GTK+ to assume none happened if
it gets a crossing event of that nature.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574#c33
This information will be useful in case someone stumbles on a situation
similar to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574, so we can
figure out where do the crossing events come from or go to easily.
It's been reported in several applications that scrolling feels jerky
since commit cc7b3985b3.
Investigation reported that the combination of passive 4-7 button grabs
on the toplevel and the presence of native subwindows might trigger
too often crossing events from the child window to the toplevel and
back as scroll "buttons" trigger the passive grab. Those crossing events
would reset the scroll valuators rendering scrolling from jerky on
touchpads (where there's intermediate smooth events between the emulated
button ones) to ineffective on regular mouse wheels (where the crossing
event would reset the valuators right before the single smooth scroll
event we get is delivered)
So, only reset scroll valuators when the pointer enters the toplevel
(we only care about this when the pointer is on the window after it's
been possibly scrolling somewhere else), and it doesn't come from an
inferior.
The situations where this happened varied though, the native subwindow
could be one created explicitly by the application, or created indirectly
through gdk_window_ensure_native(). The latter was mainly the case for
evolution (through gtk_selection_set_owner()) and any GtkScrolledWindow
under the oxygen-gtk3 theme (through gdk_window_set_composited())
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574
Add a GtkSetting for whether the desktop shell is showing the desktop
folder icons.
This is on by default because most desktop shells do show the icons on
the desktop. We already have a patch in gnome-settings-daemon to bind
this to the org.gnome.desktop.background show-desktop-icons GSettings
key which is off by default on GNOME.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712302
If a motion event handler (or other handler running from the flush-events
phase of the frame clock) recursed the main loop then flushing wouldn't
complete until after the recursed main loop returned, and various aspects
of the state would get out of sync.
To fix this, change flushing of the event queue to simply mark events as
ready to flush, and let normal event delivery handle the rest.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705176
I have been convinced that it is a bad idea to change the behaviour
at the same time as deprecating it, so go back to respecting the
Gtk/ButtonImages xsetting in buttons created with
gtk_button_new_from_stock() when it is set.
The setting as well as the function are still deprecated, and the
default value of the setting will remain FALSE.
I have been convinced that it is a bad idea to change the behaviour
at the same time as deprecating it, so go back to respecting the
Gtk/MenuImages xsetting in GtkImageMenuItem when it is set.
The setting as well as the widget are still deprecated, and the
default value of the setting will remain FALSE.
