This is meant as an input to the font chooser.
We don't want the user to select a language, but
rather have fonts presented as they would work for
the current language. Therefore, do away with the
lang/script combo on the tweak page.
Turn the GtkFontChooserLevel field into flags, and
add flags for OpenType variations and features. The
motivation for this is to make font-features in the UI
opt-in, since applications need to support them by
applying the pango attribute.
This is an automated change doing these command:
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_has_window gtk_widget_set_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_has_window gtk_widget_get_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_parent_window gtk_widget_set_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_parent_window gtk_widget_get_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_window gtk_widget_set_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_window gtk_widget_get_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_register_window gtk_widget_register_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_unregister_window gtk_widget_unregister_surface
git checkout NEWS*
Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
These can't be returned as part of the font description,
so we need new api for them. For now, this is just readonly
properties. Maybe these should be writable too, eventually.
This patch makes that work using 1 of 2 options:
1. Add all missing enums to the switch statement
or
2. Cast the switch argument to a uint to avoid having to do that (mostly
for GdkEventType).
I even found a bug while doing that: clearing a GtkImage with a surface
did not notify thae surface property.
The reason for enabling this flag even though it is tedious at times is
that it is very useful when adding values to an enum, because it makes
GTK immediately warn about all the switch statements where this enum is
relevant.
And I expect changes to enums to be frequent during the GTK4 development
cycle.
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
We can't add properties to the interface, since it breaks
3rd party implementations of the GtkFontChooser interface.
These exist, for example in gnumeric.
So, instead of a new property, add getter/setter vfuncs.
The remaining code assumes that the dialog doesn't get destroyed, but
it actually does on delete-event.
In particular, the filter function and the preview text are lost as
soon as the dialog is created and thus when we create a new dialog we
don't have those properties to set on it anymore.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719936
The font chooser constructs the display name for the font from
the family and face names. Do the same in the font button, so
we don't end up calling the same font by different names, which
would be confusing.
We rename the gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal}
macros by appending a _private to their name. Otherwise, it
would be too magic to pass the 'public' names as arguments,
but affect a member of the Private struct. At the same time,
Add two new macros with the old names,
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal} that operate
on members of the instance struct.
The macros and functions are inconsistently named, and are not tied to
the "template" concept - to the point that it seems plausible to use
them without setting the template.
The new naming scheme is as follows:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_full
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback_full
With the convenience macros:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_internal
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700898https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700896
