When a widget is app_paintable, its background should not be drawn by
the theme, thus we should not try to override its background again when
style-updated is fired.
This is a bit of a hack, but it fixes gray surfaces observed for DnD
windows with recent GTK+.
Add an internal API that allows GtkStyleContext to create a widget path
for the widget and with that bypassing gtk_widget_get_path() and that
function caching the path.
Deprecate public API where appropriate and make it no-ops.
Remove all calls to it.
Get rid of the 'transition' css property.
For now, this means spinners don't animate anymore.
... and actually set the widget on the style context. Note that this
function does not take a reference on the widget, which is a very good
reason to keep it private.
va_copy() is not universally available, and we already have a G_VA_COPY
macro that emulates the behaviour of va_copy() when it's not available, or
simply calls va_copy() if it's there
This patch adds a capture phase to GTK+'s event propagation
model. Events are first propagated from the toplevel (or the
grab widget, if a grab is in place) down to the target widget
and then back up. The second phase is using the existing
::event signal, the new capture phase is using a private
API instead of a public signal for now.
This mechanism can be used in many places where we currently
have to prevent child widgets from getting events by putting
an input-only window over them. It will also be used to implement
kinetic scrolling in subsequent patches.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641836
We automatically request more motion events in behalf of
the original widget if it listens to motion hints. So
the capturing widget doesn't need to handle such
implementation details.
We are not making event capture part of the public API for 3.4,
which is why there is no ::captured-event signal.
We don't want to fallback for 'random' touch sequences, since
that could lead to all kinds of pairedness and other violations.
Since the X server already tells us what touch events it would
have used for emulating pointer events, we just use that information
here.
gtk_window_get/set_attached_to() is a new API that allows for windows to
be attached to a GtkWidget.
The attachment is a logical binding between the toplevel window and the
widget that generated it; this kind of information is currently used to
propagate style information from the widget to the window, but is also
useful e.g. for accessibility.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666103
'window-unfocused' is too long and mentions "focus" which is historically
loaded with the meaning "input focus".
'backdrop' isn't generally used in GUI speak and still conveys the state the
widgets in an unfocused or background toplevel window are in.
Move internal accel map API there and update all users.
Also, add an internal function to create an accel path for
an action and parameter, and use it in gtkapplication.c and
gtkmodelmenuitem.c instead of duplicating that code.
Even if we can't change our sensitivity because the parent is insensitive we
should still flip the sensitive flag. Otherwise, with and insensitive parent,
child.set_sensitive(True)
...
parent.set_sensitive(True)
would result in child still being insensitive.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666392
In many cases we used to set focus_child to NULL all the way up
to the top and then to the right value, even if there was
a common ancestor, meaning these see a temporary NULL value for
focus_child. Only when the new focus widgets direct parent was
in the previous ancestor list did we stop early.
This fixes that by always stopping propagation when reaching
the common ancestor.
This function returns the accessible if it already exists. This way we
can call functions on the accessible from the widget itself instead of
having to rely on signals.
