Commit 1d0fad3 revealed that there were some assumptions made that were
actually to compensate for the bug fixed by that commit, so we need to
remove those assumptions as they would result in AerSnap to not work
properly on HiDPI screens.
Also re-do how we set the x and y positions of our GdkWindow, so that we
are more consistent across the board when we go between a GDK window
coordinate and a Windows API window cooredinate.
This would also simplify the code a bit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785999
Some drivers don't do that (not sure whether that is the correct behaviour
or not). Remember each WT_PROXIMITY with LOWORD(lParam) != 0 that we get,
then look for a WT_CSRCHANGE. If WT_CSRCHANGE doesn't come, but a WT_PACKET
does, assume that this device is the one that sent WT_PROXIMITY.
Also include fallback code to ensure that WT_PACKETs for an enabled device
disable the system pointer, because WT_PROXIMITY handler might have
enabled it by mistake, since it's not possible to know which device left
the proximity (it might have been a disabled device).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778328
Windows WM handles AeroSnap for normal windows on keydown. We did this
on keyup only because we do not get a keydown message, even if Windows WM
does nothing with a combination. However, in some specific cases it DOES
do something - and we have no way to detect that. Specifically, winkey+downarrow
causes maximized window to be restored by WM, and GDK fails to detect that. Then
GDK gets a keyup message, figures that winkey+downarrow was pressed and released,
and handles the combination - by minimizing the window.
To overcome this, install a low-level keyboard hook (high-level ones have
the same problem as normal message loop - they don't get messages when
Windows WM handles combinations) and use it to detect interesting key combinations
before Windows WM has a chance to block them from being processed.
Once an interesting combination is detected, post a message to the window, which
will be handled in due order.
It should be noted that this code handles key repetitions in a very crude manner.
The downside is that AeroSnap will not work if hook installation function call fails.
Also, this is a global hook, and if the hook procedure does something wrong, bad things
can happen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776031
Instead of checking for window state and giving it extra styles that
fit, just give it all styles that it is missing. It turned out that
otherwise it is impossible to, for example, restore a maximized window
via sysmenu. Also, be more flexible towards GDK/WM window state mismatches
and consider the window minimized/maximized if *either* GDK or WM thinks so.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776485
When primary monitor is smaller than the actual monitor on which the
window is being maximized, the WM will do widnow size adjustments
that will completely screw the window size if we try to make it
smaller than 100% fullscreen (to account for taskbar size, for example).
Fix this by overriding maximized window size during WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775808
Like the X11 and Wayland backends, re-work how the cursors are being
handled. So, we use a hash table to cache up the HCURSORS that we
create along the way.
We still need to cache up the icon/cursor themes since this is something
that is not part of Windows but was added on to support icon/cursor themes
such as Adwaita on Windows, but should be in-line with what is going on in
GdkCursor.
Also, remove the _gdk_grab_cursor global variable in gdkprivate-win32.h,
and replace it with another variable in the GdkWin32Display structure,
to make things cleaner in the process.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773299
Move the leftovers from the removals to use the current APIs, to fix the
build. Also for gdk_device_virtual_set_window_cursor(), only do
something when a valid GdkCursor is passed in here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773299
Implement GdkDisplay->get_setting() using the existing
_gdk_win32_screen_get_setting() and get rid of GdkScreen->get_setting()
as a result, to follow the changes in GDK.
Also, since we don't emit settings events in the Windows GDK backend,
but we acquire settings to print using GDK_SETTING, drop all references
related to GDK_SETTING since that is now removed. Update the debug
strings that are print out as a result
(gdk_screen_get_setting->gdk_display_get_setting).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773299
Those should be interpreted by widget-local gestures, not guessed at a
high level with no notions of the specific context. Users will want
GtkGestureMultiPress to replace these events.
Fix the build after the branch wip/alexl/simplify-gdkwindow was merged, as
there are some changes that broke things in the Windows backend, namely:
-gdk_win32_input_shape_combine_region() should not be removed at this
point (though it is a stub--otherwise GDK/Win32 will crash)
-Some more code need to be removed due to the removal of items in the
above-mentioned merged branch
Also, like the X11 backend, do not allow the creation of native child
windows, and stop checking for subsequent child windows
(GDK_WINDOW_CHILD), so that we can clean things up a bit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773299
This enables HiDPI support for GTK+ on Windows, so that the
fonts and window look better on HiDPI displays. Notes for the current
work:
-The DPI awareness enabling can be disabled if and only if an application
manifest is not embedded in the app to enable DPI awareness AND a user
compatibility setting is not set to limit DPI awareness for the app, via
the envvar GDK_WIN32_DISABLE_HIDPI. The app manifest/user setting for
DPI awareness will always win against the envvar, and so the HiDPI items
will be always setup in such scenarios, unless DPI awareness is disabled.
-Both automatic detection for the scaling factor and setting the scale
factor using the GDK_SCALE envvar are supported, where the envvar takes
precedence, which will therefore disable automatic scaling when
resolution changes.
-We now default to a per-system DPI awareness model, which means that we
do not handle WM_DPICHANGED, unless one sets the
GDK_WIN32_PER_MONITOR_HIDPI envvar, where notes for it are in the
following point.
-Automatic scaling during WM_DISPLAYCHANGE is handled (DPI setting change of
current monitor) is now supported. WM_DPICHANGED is handled as well,
except that the window positioning during the change of scaling still
needs to be refined, a change in GDK itself may be required for this.
-I am unable to test the wintab items because I don't have such devices
around.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768081
Commit d249e77 (API: screen: Remove gdk_screen_is_composited()) attempted
to update the GDK-Win32 for the removal of the API, but some parts were
missed. This updates the code so that things continue to build and run.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773299
Switch code to use gdk_display_is_composited() instead.
The new code also doesn't use a vfunc to query the property but rather
requires the backend to call set_composited()/set_rgba() to change the
value.
The GLib main loop blocks on MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx to
determine if there are any incoming messages while also allowing
for background tasks to run. If all available messages are not
processed after MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx has signaled that
there are available, CPU usage will skyrocket.
From my limited understanding (by inspection of profiling
under Visual Studio):
Key is pressed - MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx unblocks, and
sends message to GDK's event handler. Some event is now queued.
g_poll unblocks, calls the g_event_dispatch which finally
resolves to gdk_event_dispatch. This then calls
_gdk_win32_display_queue_events, but since a message is already
queued, it fails to call PeekMessage and returns immediately.
At the next iteration, g_poll again calls MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx
which queues yet another event and returns almost immediately, since
there are events available which haven't been processed by PeekMessage.
The dispatch function is then called and the process repeats.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771568
This changes the group/level semantic.
Previously W32 backend used "group 0/1" to denote "AltGr OFF/ON"
and "level 0/1" to denote "Shift is OFF/ON".
Now "group" means "keyboard layout" and there can be up to 255 groups,
while AltGr and Shift are combined into a single level enum that
takes values between 0 and 4.
Unlike X, W32 doesn't do effective group overriding, meaning that
it will never tell the caller that a different group was actually
used (even for universal keys, such as Enter), because key symbol
table is completely fabricated and there's no point in trying to
save a few of kilobytes of RAM by not duplicating universal key
records for all groups.
Also contains many whitespace changes (tab elimination, fixed
indentation) and cleanup (axed a few global variables, these are
now accessed via the default keymap).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768722
Windows save in hardware_keycode an information which is not so low
level and some application require the hardware scancode.
As Windows provides this information save it in GdkEventPrivate
and provide a function to get this information.
For no Windows system the function return the hardware_keycode instead.
Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765259
Implements gdk_win32_window_set_shadow_width().
Uses shadow width/height to adjust max tracking size, allowing
windows to be drag-resized to cover the whole desktop.
Also uses SM_C*VIRTUALSCREEN instead of SM_C*MAXTRACK.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763013
It works exactly like AeroSnap.
Except for shift+win+left/right, which is left for AeroSnap
to handle (AeroSnap takes action before we get the message,
so there's no way for us to override it).
The only thing that doesn't work is shift+win+left/right on
a maximized window, for reasons unknown at the moment.
This only implements winkey+stuff behaviour of AeroSnap,
not the drag-to-the-edge-and-something-funny-happens one.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763013
If a layered window was hidden and is made visible, erase its
contents before showing it. GDK will schedule a redraw, but until
then we generally don't want to show old contents.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763783
This is achieved by sending undocumented message WM_SYSMENU
to the window.
Before doing that, the window is given WS_SYSMENU style
(to enable window menu) and some combination of
WS_MAXIMIZEBOX (for "Mazimize" item)
WS_MINIMIZEBOX (for "Minimize" item)
WS_SIZEBOX (for "Size" item)
depending on which operations are currently permissible.
WM_SYSMENU is processed by DefWindowProc(), which results
in showing the window menu. We remove extra styles
at the first opportunity (WM_INITMENU message), as they
alter the way our window is rendered.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763851
This removes the event_poll_fd global variable and the (ab)use of
get_default_display. It is also more consistent with other backends.
Also store display
* Explicitly grab the device, setting appropriate cursor on it.
* Fix gdk_device_virtual_set_window_cursor() to just set the
cursor, without trying to check that mouse is over the given
window. Also prevent it from immediately resetting cursor.
* Alse take into account things that happen in other parts of
GDK - don't look for replacement cursor, GDK already did that,
and don't create a default arrow cursor instead of NULL,
GDK-W32 already did that up the stack as well.
Warn about inappropriate cursor == NULL argument instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762711
Toplevels are now true layered windows that are moved,
resized and repainted via UpdateLayeredWindow() API call.
This achieves transparency without any extra effort,
and prevents window size and window contents desychronization
(bug 761629).
This also changes the way CSD windows are detected. We now
use window decorations to detect CSDiness of a window,
and to decide whether a window should be layered (CSD windows should
be) or not.
Decorations are now stored in the window implementation,
not as a quark-based property of the window-as-gobject.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748872
Normally works only on CSD windows, non-CSD windows continue
to use WM modal loop for drag-resizing and drag-moving. However,
if it is activated on non-CSD windows, it does work.
Has the advantage of being completely immune to AeroSnap.
AeroSnap only worked partially on CSD windows, with the only part
that worked being "don't let users drag window titlebar outside of
the desktop". Now AeroSnap doesn't work on windows moved by
this code at all, which is good, since they currently don't work
well with it due to the way shadows are drawn.
It's possible to also re-implement AeroSnap (or something similar),
but that is a story for another commit.
This code was originally intended to fix the problem of window
size and window contents desynchronization, but failed to achieve
that result in the end. Nevertheless, it serves as a foundation for
other changes to the way window resizing works.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761629
1) MSDN says that the coordinates of the maximized window
must be specified as if the window was on the primary display,
even if nearest display where it ends up is not the primary display.
So instead of using nearest display work area verbatim,
use it only to account for taskbar size, while using
primary display top-left corner (0:0) as the reference point.
2) MSDN says that max tracking size is a system property, we
should just call GetSystemMetrics() and use that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762629
This prevents normal application windows (and other kinds of windows)
from being moved up in Z-order to be above windows that have the
always-on-top bit set. Doing so would make the previously-normal windows
in question also always-on-top implicitly.
Windows that are already always-on-top will be restacked on top of other
always-on-top windows too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746745
