Because of our port of css animation and css transition to
progress tracker, we should not think of animated styles as
immutable objects that can map any timestamp to css values.
Rather, timestamps can correspond to different values depending
on the value of GTK_SLOWDOWN over the course of the animation.
To keep animated styles and style animations totally immutable,
we will not share styleanimations between animatedstyles, and
make a new copy of a styleanimation for each timestamp.
Not the ideal solution for this problem, but in practice leads to
much better performance on lower end hardware.
Stack does a double draw on the first frame of its animation, of
both the old contents (into a cairo surface) and the new contents.
Homogeneous stacks only need to reallocate contents on the first
frame.
On lower powered hardware where our frames will be a good deal
slower than the refresh rate anyway, we can assure a smother
experience by waiting a frame to start tweening where frame duration
will be more consistent.
glade-previewer places a gtkwindow inside another toplevel gtkwindow,
updating the shadow width for the client induces a busy loop where the
parent will grow continuously until it crashes gnome-shell/mutter.
To avoid the loop, do not update the shadow width if not dealing with a
toplevel window.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761651
A naive way to perform an action on all parent nodes of a given node
could be to do:
while(gtk_tree_model_iter_parent(model, &iter, &iter)) {
/* perform some action on iter here */
}
However, since gtk_tree_model_iter_parent() will initialize the iterator
pointed to by the second parameter before performing the lookup, this
will not work.
Explicitly document this behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Wouter Verhelst <w@uter.be>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=573380
We use a label_sizing_box to make sure the headerbar can always contain
both a title and a subtitle without resizing when showing/hiding either
of them, but we should only do that for the height; the min width of the
label_box can be larger than that of the label_sizing_box.
Commit cdc580463e made it so that
unresizable windows can't be smaller than a set default size but it
lost the logic to ensure these windows remain at least big enough to
comply with their requisition.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764174
We were missing all of the status directories, and a few sizes.
This was causing us to not find image-missing on systems without
hicolor icon theme (this basically only happens on Windows).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764378
e8aa9b0440 introduced a new debug mode
that highlights resizes. Unfortunately it has the side effect of
always queueing redraws even when the debug mode is not enabled.
Make the redraw conditional.
While this commit was found to make emacs windows shrink (and it was
reverted in the gtk-3-20 branch for that reason), that was the only
observed breakage, while the reversal broke several of our unit tests.
Closer study of the emacs sources revealed that it does some really
unsupportable things like doing its own X event handling behind GTK+'s
back and freely mixing sizes of GtkWindows and GdkWindows obtained in
various ways. I've filed a bug against emacs with suggestions for how
to avoid the shrinking window, regardless of this commit.
Original commit message:
It seems this branch is not needed anymore. It was originally added in
1999 to support gtk_widget_realize(), but all those reasons seem
obsolete today.
Instead just call gtk_widget_realize().
If you end up at this commit when bisecting:
There is no bug that made me remove this code, it was purely meant to be
cleanup / dead code removal. I seem to have introduced a new bug or
bisecting wouldn't have let you here. So it seems we should just revert
this commit.
Since we are really only interested in the center point of the
slider allocation, the pre-computed slider geometry is perfectly
fine, just use it always. This avoids the complication with
gadget visibility.
The slider gadget may be turned invisible as side-effect of
gtk_range_calc_slider(). If that happens,
gtk_css_gadget_get_content_allocation() returns { 0, 0, 0, 0},
which leads us to calculate a negative allocation for the highlight
node. Avoid this, by just reusing our already calculated slider
allocation in this case (it is not technically the same as the
content, allocation, but the difference hardly matter here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764022
As the elements in the enum are not explicitly numbered, inserting an
element between some other elements shall change the values of elements
after the insertion. So append the new element at the end.
Anyway, no code should rely on the position of an element in an enum.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763850
Some other widget might have mapped and raised another child window of
the toplevel in the meantime, causing the popover window to be covered.
Raise the popover window to avoid the issue.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763627
The trash is monitored for state changes - going from empty to non-empty and the
other way round. Monitoring is done by handling change signals from a regular
file monitor. On each signal, an enumeration of the trash contents is started in
order to see if it is empty or not. This causes issues when many files are
trashed, because the gvfs trash backend is flooded with enumeration requests,
resulting in CPU usage spikes. In order to fix this, the "item-count" attribute
of the trash should be queried instead.
Replace asynchronous enumeration with asynchronous information query and update
the trash state based on the "item-count" attribute. Emit state change signal
only when the state actually changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763600
When loading a per-theme settings.ini file, look for it in
the same directory where we found the gtk.css file for the
theme. Previously, we were always looking in
$prefix/share/themes/THEME/gtk-3.0/, even if the css was
loaded from somewhere else.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641354
With this change, we now look in
$XDG_DATA_HOME/themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
$HOME/.themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
$XDG_DATA_DIRS/themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
GTK_DATA_PREFIX/themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641354
When animating, we might be changing the size allocation of the previous
stack child. However, we were not querying the size in the process
meaning you would often see warnings about allocating the size without
knowing what it should be.
This simply adds an innocuous size request, since responding to last_child
sizing requests is not all that critical in the transition.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763900
