It does not make sense to pass a for_size into the size allocation
machinery that is smaller than the min-size in that direction.
Warn if it happens, so we can track it down when it occurs.
added a min-height/width compensation too when in fine-tune mode,
so scale with marks and no labels doesn't make the scale node grow
when in fine-tune.
added a scale node padding compensation for the trough growth in
fine-tune mode, so now the scale node doesn't grow anymore when
mark labels are present.
We were failing to do that, leading to progress not disappearing
anymore after it was initially shown, in the gtk3-widget-factory
entry progress example.
If animations are disabled, the only difference we need to make is that
we don't have to start the transition. Size requests should remain the
same.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762996
Previous commit to address the default size introduced a regression
with fixed size windows if no default size was given, the resulting
window would end up much smaller than its actual content.
kind of a workaround, this approach is pretty unmaintainable, I
hope we'll get a CSS property for spacing directly on the parent
container (a toolbar in this particular case).
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762397
If a window is not resizable (with gtk_window_set_resizable ()),
the size given with gtk_window_set_default_size() is ignored.
The solution to this would be to use gtk_widget_set_size_request() but
that's a GtkWidget API and therefore does not take into account the
client side decorations when in use with GtkWindow.
Refactor the code so that gtk_window_set_default_size() (which is a
GtkWindow API) gives the expected result on non-resizable windows as
well.
bugzilla: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762974
Will make GTK+ more willing to use CSD for all normal windows without
being asked to. Lack of desktop composition will, of course, prevent
it from using CSD (in theory).
GTK_CSD=0 will force CSD to NOT to be used whenever
possible (i.e. in cases where CSD is not specifically requested
by a window, by design).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759899
When a gtk_widget_queue_allocate() on some widget increases the clip,
widget->parent's clip was not updated. This appraoch naively just
unions widget's new clip with widget->parent's clip.
This of course only works if widget and parent share the same GDK
window. In the cases where they don't we can't do anything and need a
better fix.
Fixes label-text-shadow-changes-modify-clip.ui reftest.
The check is not working for many containers anymore as they are not the
direct parents of their children. We want to allow this behavior in more
places.
We create and destroy gadgets inside the levelbar hierarchy here,
and if we don't explicitly remove their CSS nodes from the parent,
they stick around.
