This uses the idle-inhibit protocol from wayland-protocols, to attach an
inhibitor to the GdkSurface. The inhibit function can be called as many
times as the user wants, but the uninhibit function MUST be called as
many times to unset the idle inhibition.
This has been tested on Sway.
If you run weston with the headless backend, you get a Wayland
display with no seat, which is just fine by the protocol.
gdk_display_get_default_seat() returns NULL in this case. Various
widgets assume that we always have a seat with a keyboard and a
pointer, since that is what X guarantees. Make things survive
without that, so we can run the testsuite under a headless
Wayland compositor.
If the wl_surface receiving touch events is destroyed, we will get no
wl_touch.up event to remove the touchpoint from our internal accounting.
Check for this, and drop touchpoints happening in surfaces that do
disappear during operation.
We don't create a grabbing popup if it's not the top most one, as that
is a protocol violation, and complain if anything attempts to do it.
What we didn't do is handle this gracefully in the code that tries to
create said popup.
Fix this by dropping the attempt to show the popup on the floor, instead
of setting various state making it look like it succeeded. This won't
actually fix anything, but it'll result in a bit more accurate warnings
logged, as the state more correctly corresponds to the reality.
GdkEvent has been a "I-can't-believe-this-is-not-OOP" type for ages,
using a union of sub-types. This has always been problematic when it
comes to implementing accessor functions: either you get generic API
that takes a GdkEvent and uses a massive switch() to determine which
event types have the data you're looking for; or you create namespaced
accessors, but break language bindings horribly, as boxed types cannot
have derived types.
The recent conversion of GskRenderNode (which had similar issues) to
GTypeInstance, and the fact that GdkEvent is now a completely opaque
type, provide us with the chance of moving GdkEvent to GTypeInstance,
and have sub-types for GdkEvent.
The change from boxed type to GTypeInstance is pretty small, all things
considered, but ends up cascading to a larger commit, as we still have
backends and code in GTK trying to access GdkEvent structures directly.
Additionally, the naming of the public getter functions requires
renaming all the data structures to conform to the namespace/type-name
pattern.
A toplevel will only ever be transient-for to another toplevel, and only
a toplevel will ever be transient-for, so move the field into the
GdkWaylandToplevel, and make it a pointer to another GdkWaylandToplevel.
We them up there, so that code higher up compared to where they are
defined now can make use of them. Also add a few macros for type
checking and casting.
The third version of xdg-shell introduces support for explicit popup
repositioning. If available, make use of this to implement popup
repositioning.
Note that this does *NOT* include atomic parent-child state
synchronization. For that,
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland-protocols/issues/13 will
be needed.
This currently uses my own fork of wayland-protocols which adds meson
support, so that we can use it as a subproject. Eventually when
wayland-protocols' meson support lands upstream, we should change it to
point there.
Silence some meson warnings while at it to make CI happy.
This also bumps the glib requirement, since g_warning_once() is used.
With the current implementation, we use a `wl_seat` as the key for our
internal has table where we store the Wayland shortcuts inhibitors.
There is however no technical reason for this, and we could use a
GdkSeat instead, which will ease the implementation of the GdkToplevel
shortcut inhibition API.
There is no shape combining going on anymore, so
call this just gdk_surface_set_input_region, and
remove the offset arguments too. All callers pass
0 anyway.
Update all callers and implementations.
When a popup is already showing, and gdk_surface_present_popup() is
called, if the layout didn't change, we're not really interested in
relayouting.
In the future, we'll be able to get notified if position of the popup
would change by some environmental changes, but until then, just don't
support it.
