There was a sign issue in a coordinate transform that made us
flush the wrong region when flushing an implicit paint.
The non-double buffered drawing would then be drawn over the
right area, but then at the end of the implicit paint this
would be overdrawn with the area we didn't properly remove
from the implicit paint.
Also, the translation from window coords to impl window
coords is now done before removing any active double
buffered paints, as these are also in impl window coords.
With the changes in default CSS to make the default background transparent
we ran into issues where intermediate GdkWindow (for instance the
view_window in GtkViewport) where we didn't set an explicit background
(because before they were always covered). So instead of showing throught
the transparent windows were showing the default backgroind of the intermediate
window (i.e. black).
With this change we also needed to fix GtkViewport, as it was previously
relying on the bin and view windows to cover widget->window so that the
border was not visible if shadow_type was NONE.
When calling gtk_window_present(), gdk_win32_window_raise did not
actually raise the window anymore. Replacing BringWindowToTop() with
SetForegroundWindow() fixes this.
During testing, we also discovered that sometimes SetForeGroundWindow()
will (correctly) refuse to raise the window and fail(for example: sometimes
when dragging a different application at the time of a gtk_window_present()
call). To prevent a GdkWarning from being produced, usage of the API_CALL
macro has been removed for this case.
Additional goodies of SetForeGroundWindow:
- it brings the window to the front when the process owning the
window to raise is the foreground process (for example when
gtk_window_present is called from a GtkStatusIcon's activate
signal handler)
- it limits itself to flashing the task bar button associated
with the window if the process owning the window to raise
is *not* the foreground process (for example when gtk_window_present
is called from a g_timeout_add callback function)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665760
Due to changes in the behaviour of the virtual modifiers around MOD1 the
implementation of the map_virtual_modifiers vfunc was mangling the modifiers
and making keybindings not work correctly.
This change updates the implementation to match the X11 implementation's
behaviour.
Callers of this function were passing in -1, -1 for the width and height if
they just wanted the window moving - rather than the size changing. We need to
respect that behaviour and don't try and set the width/height to those
dimensions.
Now pop-up windows (ala combo-boxes) work!
"The child window MUST also have the _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK property set to
the ID of the child window. […] If the _NET_SUPPORTING_WM_CHECK window on the
client window is missing or not properly set, clients SHOULD assume that no
conforming Window Manager is present."
This commit implements that, which allows us to not have to do a
XGetWindowProperty() every N seconds when running under a compliant WM.
This is also a more correct fix for the bug handled in commit
daf29bffed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666921
The part in gdkwindow-x11.c which uses XIEvent and friends is "protected"
by HAVE_XGENERICEVENTS, i.e., XGetEventData() has been found. (Xlib.h)
XIEvent and friends are defined in <X11/extension/XInput2.h> which is
included by gdkdisplay-x11.h if XINPUT_2 is defined.
The patch makes sure XIEvent is only used if XINPUT_2 is defined.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667534
When we receive a configure event from Wayland telling us to resize our
surface we check against the geometry constraints for the window to ensure we
do not resize below the minimum and maximum limits.
Now that grab and ungrab vfuncs are implemented on GdkDevice then we can use
gdk_device_ungrab to break the implicit grab created by the button press that
triggered the resize and move.
An implicit grab is created inside GTK+ when the button is pressed down on a
window. The semantics of wl_shell_surface_resize means that you don't get a
corresponding release event that would ordinarily break the implicit grab. So
we must do it as part of the resize request.
