When calling gtk_widget_draw() on the entry gtk_cairo_should_draw_window()
will return TRUE for all windows. This is used when rendering a widget to
somewhere other than the screen, and its now used for transparent widgets.
This caused the texthandle to always draw itself and terminate the draw
handler for the entry.
Instead we now only draw the markers when really visible, plus we return
FALSE to avoid stopping the entry drawing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
This adds gtk_widget_get/set_opacity, as well as a GtkWidget.opacity
property. Additionally it deprectates gtk_window_get/set_opacity and
removes the GtkWindow.opacity property (in preference for the new
identical inherited property from GtkWidget, which should be ABI/API
compat).
The implementation is using the new gdk_window_set_opacity child
window support for windowed widgets, and cairo_push/pop_group()
bracketing in gtk_widget_draw() for non-window widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
This replaces the previously hardcoded calls to gdk_window_set_user_data,
and also lets us track which windows are a part of a widget. Old code
should continue working as is, but new features that require the
windows may not work perfectly.
We need this for the transparent widget support to work, as we need
to specially mark the windows of child widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
The "activate" action here did not do anything.
It is possible we actually want to have some actions here,
like "step-up", "step-down", "page-up", "page-down", etc.
For now, just remove the AtkAction implementation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553334
There's really no reason why we shouldn't automatically create a
GtkViewport when the widget added to GtkScrolledWindow is not a
GtkScrollable, instead of just printing a g_warning.
Copy the viewport special case into the scrolled window implementation
of gtk_container_add().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693015
Saves ~6MB of memory per application in the Adwaita I am using - at
least until the app starts using all the images in the theme, because
the code doesn't discard images yet once they were loaded.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692934
This is essentially a GtkCssImage for a cairo_surface_t and is a pretty
much straight up copy of GtkCssImageUrl. But we want to implement lazy
loading and animations, so GtkCssImageUrl is going to gain new
features...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692934
I'd like to use it when printing the value, but I haven't found a way to
do that sanely yet, as I'd need to be able to print relative paths for
make check to work (otherwise the srcdir would blow things up). And we
use a GString to output to, so there's no way to attach a base dir to
that.
If anyone has an idea how to achieve that, poke me. Having the real
filename in debug prints sounds like a very good idea to me.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692934
Commit ddceddaa84 removed the call to
gtk_style_context_set_background() in favour of always rendering it with
gtk_render_background() during the draw vfunc.
This has the side effect of making the backing window always
transparent, which blocks GTK from applying some optimizations during
the paint cycle. The result is that, especially in clutter-gtk
applications, scrolling performance gets really bad.
This commit partially reverts ddceddaa84
and changes the code so that both gtk_style_context_set_background() and
gtk_render_background() are called
Commit da09447914 removed the call to
gtk_style_context_set_background() in favour of always rendering it with
gtk_render_background() during the draw vfunc.
This has the side effect of making the backing window always
transparent, which blocks GTK from applying some optimizations during
the paint cycle. The result is that, especially in clutter-gtk
applications, scrolling performance gets really bad.
This commit partially reverts da09447914
and changes the code so that both gtk_style_context_set_background() and
gtk_render_background() are called.
gtk_tree_drag_source_drag_data_get's GtkSelectionData argument should not be
marked as (out) because:
a) GtkSelectionData is semi-private (it's declared in gtkselectionprivate.h),
and thus gobject-introspection has no knowledge of its fields or its size.
There is thus no way for language bindings to allocate GtkSelectionData.
b) Even if it was possible for language bindings to allocate GtkSelectionData,
a zeroed-out instance thus created would not be usable with
gtk_tree_drag_source_drag_data_get. As far as I can tell, you need to
initialize its "target" member to the GdkAtom of "GTK_TREE_MODEL_ROW".
Language bindings have no way of knowing this, of course.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692844
This is akin to commit cfb09e5654 in the gtk-2-24 branch;
the last_folder_uri is no longer being used for anything meaningful, so we
remove it altogether.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
This is a quickfix to keep things working.
It turns out GtkWindow assumes it can do sizing operations while not
being visible, or while in the process of show()ing/hide()ing itself.
And commit b495ce54 broke these operations.
Figuring this properly requires some more thinking and restructuring on
my part, so for now we relax the requirement of visiblility enough for
these things to start working again.
