If CSS values are queried from a widget, recompute them if necessary. Do
not emit style-updated until the validation phase however.
This way, we don't run into performance traps when style-update causes
invalidations that cause new style-updated to be emitted.
... and pass it to the API that computes new styles.
A special timestamp of 0 means "please don't animate" and is used when
no frame clock is available for a node.
This is mainly an attempt to merge the update_style() and validte()
vfuncs. Code is not there yet, but that's the idea.
Also, gtk_css_node_set_style() should not be public. And this gets
closer to that goal, too.
After measuring it, I realized the optimization never triggers for
Adwaita and rarely ever triggers for simple themes. So it is not
useful to keep it around.
This allows adding more API for it.
It also includes code that tracks modifications and invalidates siblings
and their positions whenever nodes get added or removed.
If we know the parent's get_path_for_child() implementation is safe to
be used with GtkCssNode because it doesn't do anything special, we do
that. Unfortunately that requires whitelisting vfuncs because the vfunc
is public API so anyone can override it.
Instead, use gtk_widget_get_path() which makes GtkWidget cache the path.
This is a temporary solution until we can get rid of widget paths.
This increases memory usage quite noticably.
The node declaration has the same functionality as
gtk_css_node_declaration_add_to_widget_path(). So instead of using that
function on a path, you can use the original path and the declaration in
a matcher.
So far the vfunc is kinda quirky (the path argument is an out argument
for something you have to free when you're done with the matcher), but
I'm about to change that.
We don't want to add the current classes to the widget path - which
might potentially be different after a gtk_style_context_save() - but
the root node's ones. So what better thing to do than actually using the
root node?
Instead of directly requesting the layout phase, register a tick
callback. This is what the docs suggest for animations and it's what we
need for the next commit.
... to a bunch of functions.
This requires a tiny change to the heuristics for the style cache - we
now cache styles when they have the same style provider as their parent
instead of when they have the default provider - but that change doesn't
have any effect in practice.
The parent refs the child, so gtk_css_node_set_parent() adds/removes a
reference.
We should probably refactor this so that we name the function
parent.add(node) instead of node.set_parent(parent) - makes the
refcounting more clear.
Instead of passing the style declaration, take the node's style
declaration. Add arguments to allow overriding the state for the one
case where this didn't work.
The code is confusing the stylecontext=>node transition, so I'll remove
it.
WIth the recent introduction of the parent style cachen, I'm not sure
it's worth it at all. Some crude benchmarking suggests a slight speedup
when removing the cache.
So no guarantees about adding it back later.
- GtkCssWidgetNode
for style contexts owned by a widget
- GtkCssPathNode
for style contexts using a GtkWidgetPath
- GtkCssTransientNode
for nodes created with gtk_style_context_save()/restore()
The functionality of it is supposed to grow, so better put it in a
custom file early.
This is just a naive split so far, the next patches will split things
further.
This commit adds the GtkTextTag:underline-rgba and :strikethrough-rgba
properties and the necessary plumbing to apply these colors in GtkTextLayout.
With this change, you can alter the color of underlines including those
of type PANGO_UNDERLINE_ERROR.
You might want to alter the underline color to differentiate between
spelling and grammer mistakes. In code editors, it is convenient to
differentiate between errors and warnings.
Note that the GtkTextAppearance struct is public ABI and has no spare
room for new fields, so we are resorting to some tricky packing to store
the colors in the unused pixel field of the fg_color and bg_color structs.
This packing is accomplished by the macros in gtktextattributesprivate.h.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hergert <christian@hergert.me>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402168
It has been a long-standing request to interpret scroll events
with Shift held down as horizontal instead of vertical, and
some applications are already doing this on their own.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132197
This causes pixman warnings, or worse.
Clearly, something is not quite right here, if we end up
redrawing tabs at a time when the allocation is set to (1, 1).
For now, avoid straining the error handling in the lower layers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746301
On popover_unmap(), perform the gtk_widget_unmap() call last, so the
GtkWindowPopover data is ensured to be alive throughout the function
if the popover widget is destroyed right on ::unmap.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745829
This ensures the widget data stays live long enough to perform invariants
check after emission if the widget happens to be destroyed on a callback.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745829
`bundle install` command on fedora 21 was failing
with following message:
Your Gemfile has no gem server sources. If you need
gems that are not already on your machine, add a line
like this to your Gemfile:
source 'https://rubygems.org'
After adding that line it worked again.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746205
With the 3.0 transition, this code went from just querying the entry's
height request to doing a full size request.
Then it got code to revert the features that a full size request does.
And then it grew code that manually computed the baseline.
Avoid this and just do what happened back in the days: Do a regular
height request.
This changes the semantics of the get_frame_size() vfunc wrt its
behavior towards subclasses overwriting the get_height() vfuncs, but I'm
happy to live with that.
Applications forget to set the follow-state property and then some
themes used a style where normal symbolic icons have the same color as
prelit or selected backgrounds and that suddenly made icons invisible
and who wants that?
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746201
