This code came from a home-grown testing mechanism, which didn't aggregate tests
into a test suite; it just ran them one by one. Here we move some of that machinery
to GTestDataFunc for more flexibility in running tests.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
This adds a way to get the gtk_widget_set_opacity liike behaviour
of retargeting GdkWindows and exposing every child in ::draw, without
actually having an alpha. This is needed if you're doing more complex things
such as cross fading of widgets.
We do this as a hack by using opacity values that round to 255 yet not
really 1.0 in order to avoid having some magical API call for this
mainly internal call.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
Sink the GtkEntry assigned to the private structure of GtkCellRendererText
before signals containing it as an argument are sent out. This keeps
language bindings from sinking the reference and then destroying the entry
when the signal closure is finished.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693400
When calling gtk_widget_draw() on the entry gtk_cairo_should_draw_window()
will return TRUE for all windows. This is used when rendering a widget to
somewhere other than the screen, and its now used for transparent widgets.
This caused the texthandle to always draw itself and terminate the draw
handler for the entry.
Instead we now only draw the markers when really visible, plus we return
FALSE to avoid stopping the entry drawing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
This adds gtk_widget_get/set_opacity, as well as a GtkWidget.opacity
property. Additionally it deprectates gtk_window_get/set_opacity and
removes the GtkWindow.opacity property (in preference for the new
identical inherited property from GtkWidget, which should be ABI/API
compat).
The implementation is using the new gdk_window_set_opacity child
window support for windowed widgets, and cairo_push/pop_group()
bracketing in gtk_widget_draw() for non-window widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
This replaces the previously hardcoded calls to gdk_window_set_user_data,
and also lets us track which windows are a part of a widget. Old code
should continue working as is, but new features that require the
windows may not work perfectly.
We need this for the transparent widget support to work, as we need
to specially mark the windows of child widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
The "activate" action here did not do anything.
It is possible we actually want to have some actions here,
like "step-up", "step-down", "page-up", "page-down", etc.
For now, just remove the AtkAction implementation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553334
There's really no reason why we shouldn't automatically create a
GtkViewport when the widget added to GtkScrolledWindow is not a
GtkScrollable, instead of just printing a g_warning.
Copy the viewport special case into the scrolled window implementation
of gtk_container_add().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693015
Saves ~6MB of memory per application in the Adwaita I am using - at
least until the app starts using all the images in the theme, because
the code doesn't discard images yet once they were loaded.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692934
This is essentially a GtkCssImage for a cairo_surface_t and is a pretty
much straight up copy of GtkCssImageUrl. But we want to implement lazy
loading and animations, so GtkCssImageUrl is going to gain new
features...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692934
I'd like to use it when printing the value, but I haven't found a way to
do that sanely yet, as I'd need to be able to print relative paths for
make check to work (otherwise the srcdir would blow things up). And we
use a GString to output to, so there's no way to attach a base dir to
that.
If anyone has an idea how to achieve that, poke me. Having the real
filename in debug prints sounds like a very good idea to me.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692934
Commit ddceddaa84 removed the call to
gtk_style_context_set_background() in favour of always rendering it with
gtk_render_background() during the draw vfunc.
This has the side effect of making the backing window always
transparent, which blocks GTK from applying some optimizations during
the paint cycle. The result is that, especially in clutter-gtk
applications, scrolling performance gets really bad.
This commit partially reverts ddceddaa84
and changes the code so that both gtk_style_context_set_background() and
gtk_render_background() are called
Commit da09447914 removed the call to
gtk_style_context_set_background() in favour of always rendering it with
gtk_render_background() during the draw vfunc.
This has the side effect of making the backing window always
transparent, which blocks GTK from applying some optimizations during
the paint cycle. The result is that, especially in clutter-gtk
applications, scrolling performance gets really bad.
This commit partially reverts da09447914
and changes the code so that both gtk_style_context_set_background() and
gtk_render_background() are called.
gtk_tree_drag_source_drag_data_get's GtkSelectionData argument should not be
marked as (out) because:
a) GtkSelectionData is semi-private (it's declared in gtkselectionprivate.h),
and thus gobject-introspection has no knowledge of its fields or its size.
There is thus no way for language bindings to allocate GtkSelectionData.
b) Even if it was possible for language bindings to allocate GtkSelectionData,
a zeroed-out instance thus created would not be usable with
gtk_tree_drag_source_drag_data_get. As far as I can tell, you need to
initialize its "target" member to the GdkAtom of "GTK_TREE_MODEL_ROW".
Language bindings have no way of knowing this, of course.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692844
This is akin to commit cfb09e5654 in the gtk-2-24 branch;
the last_folder_uri is no longer being used for anything meaningful, so we
remove it altogether.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
This is a quickfix to keep things working.
It turns out GtkWindow assumes it can do sizing operations while not
being visible, or while in the process of show()ing/hide()ing itself.
And commit b495ce54 broke these operations.
Figuring this properly requires some more thinking and restructuring on
my part, so for now we relax the requirement of visiblility enough for
these things to start working again.
The code is always instantiating this schema at a fixed location, so why
is it relocatable?
Add a path so that it shows up properly in dconf-editor, and from the
gsettings commandline tool.
The code is always instantiating this schema at a fixed location, so why
is it relocatable?
Add a path so that it shows up properly in dconf-editor, and from the
gsettings commandline tool.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692163
-Rename the "libgail" projects to gtka11y, for consistency with the
autotools builds
-Update the projects completion in gtk/a11y/Makefile.am, as the sources are
now listed under $(libgtka11y_la_SOURCES) instead of $(libgail_la_SOURCES)
An instance of GtkAdjustment may be used by another instance after
the spin button widget is destroyed. In that case, the function
gtk_spin_button_accessible_value_changed() will be called with an
invalid argument. This situation is often caused when one use
GtkCellRendererSpin widget. To avoid invalid call of the function,
the signal handler for the "value-changed" signal should be disconnected
when the spin-button widget is destroyed.
Using g_signal_connect_object achieves just that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691592
Since 16195ad the “expand” property is always set to FALSE when a
column is resized. This commit takes a different approach and enables
“expand” whenever the column is wide enough. An appropriate
“fixed-width” (so that the desired width is achieved after expanding) is
calculated using equations that are explained in the code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
Rewrites gtk_tree_view_column_request_width() and
gtk_tree_view_size_allocate_columns() to respect the minimum and natural
sizes that are already being returned by
gtk_cell_area_context_get_preferred_width().
The convoluted logic explained (not!) by this comment has been removed:
“Only update the expand value if the width of the widget has changed, or
the number of expand columns has changed, or if there are no expand
columns, or if we didn't have an size-allocation yet after the last
validated node.” This logic seems to have been a workaround for the
“jumping” behavior fixed in 16195ad and is no longer necessary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
Removes the hidden “resized-width” and “use-resized-width” properties
from GtkTreeViewColumn and instead uses the “fixed-width” property to
serve the same purpose. “fixed-width”, if set, will now override the
auto-sized width (-1 is now a legal value meaning “not set”).
Additional “cleanups” in this commit:
1. When the user resizes the column the “expand” property is now also
set to FALSE, in order to prevent the column from suddenly jumping to a
different width when the window is resized.
2. The code that translated mouse movement to column sizes has been
simplified:
the change in column width is now calculated directly from the distance
the mouse cursor has traveled. Weird behavior that might have happened
previously if the position of the column changed during resizing, is now
prevented.
3. There was some lengthy logic handling the keyboard shortcuts used to
resize treeview columns, which would call gtk_widget_error_bell() once
the minimum or maximum width was reached. Instead of rewriting these
checks I simply set the “fixed-width” property to what was requested,
relying on the fact that it is already clamped between the minimum and
maximum width during size allocation.
I will greatly surprised if anyone notices the missing error bell.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
Splits up size_request() so that the height calculations are only done
when get_preferred_height() is called and the width calculations are
only done when get_preferred_width() is called. Since
get_preferred_width() does not change the treeview->priv->width value,
treeview->priv->prev_width will always be equal to it and can therefore
be removed. The only place where prev_width was used is a block in
gtk_tree_view_size_allocate(). This block seems to be adjusting the
horizontal scrollbar to account for treeview->priv->width having been
changed in size_request() and should no longer be necessary. A similar
block immediately above it seems to already account for the width change
in size_allocate().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
After “validation” (i.e., background size calculations) of some cells,
size_request() was called here to update the internally cached size of
the treeview. Apparently not updating the sizes leads to some kind of
“inconsistency” that messes with top_row_to_dy(). In the GTK3 model for
size allocation, things are more complicated. The treeview can’t just
go ahead and calculate its own size any more; instead it reports both a
“minimum” and a “natural” size, and it doesn’t know what size it will
actually get until size_allocate(). It may be necessary to update
top_row_to_dy() to deal with not knowing the exact size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
We want to reserve space for the size of the scrollbars even when they
are not visible. And because toggling visibile to off now returns 0 for
size requests, this won't work anymore.
The window size can be queried on widget->window directly, no need to
store it in widget->allocation.
This change is necessary because gtk_widget_set_allcation() is now
checking invariants that assume it's called from insize
gtk_widget_size_allocate() and that wasn;t the case here.
Commit e32da246a8 made GtkRange's trough
respect the CSS margin property, but it also trimmed the box in which
the trough reacts to click events by the margin.
We still want to catch events in that area instead, and just make sure
the margin is applied when drawing (which was already implemented by
that commit).
This commit reverts the parts of
e32da246a8 that didn't involve drawing,
fixing the bug.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691677
When cross-compiling, instead of depending on a natively built GTK+ (which means
building Glib, ATK, Pango, gdk-pixbuf, libX11...) for gtk-update-icon-cache,
find the host compiler and gdk-pixbuf, and build another gtk-update-icon-cache
with that.
This uses AX_PROG_CC_FOR_BUILD from autostars to find the host compiler, and
assumes that you'd set PKG_CONFIG_FOR_BUILD to a host pkg-config binary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691301
GtkWidget::visible is required for the widget to:
- have a preferred size other than 0/0
- have a size allocated
- return other values than { -1, -1, 1, 1 } from get_allocation()
This is an experimental patch aiming to make concepts and behaviors
inside GTK more concreate. GtkWidget::visible is now essentially what
CSS does for "display: none".
Note that if you want the effect of CSS's "visibility: hidden", you'll
have to use a GtkNotebook with an empty page as the concept of reserving
space but not drawing anything isn't supported natively in GTK.
It's a lot uglier now, but it shouldn't crash anymore.
We must update the font description for animations, but we can't free it
on query, because some paths call gtk_style_context_get_font() twice in
a row without stopping the use of the first call. So us just creating a
new font description all the time and unreffing the old one is not a
good idea. So we just mere the new one into the old one.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691186
Previously, with STATE_FLAGS_REPLACE we would unset _all_ the state
flags on children, not just the ones that do propagate. This caused the
RTL/LTR flags to get lost.
We add a separate gtk-a11y.h single-include header for
them. This header will work much the same as gtkx.h. It
will be installed in /usr/include/gtk-3.0/gtk, but you
have to include it separately.
Since we are going to install these headers soon, we need
to make their mutual includes work in the installed location
as well. Also, avoid including individual gtk headers, to
avoid trouble with single-include guards.
This commit exposes the get_type() functions and standard
headers for accessible implementations. This makes it possible
to derive from the GTK accessible implementations without
GType magic tricks. This is necessary, because we require the
a11y type hierarchy to be parallel to the widget type hierarchy.
So, if you derive a widget and need to adjust its a11y implementation,
you have to be able to derive its accessible implementation.
This commit probably exposes more than is absolutely necessary,
it also exposes accessibles of widgets that are unlikely candidates
for deriving from.
Since not every theme renders a background for a GtkViewport (and
Adwaita master doesn't), ensure the grid+viewport we use to emulate a
text view here uses the "view" style class.
It already paints the css border, so let's make it also honor css
background. This is needed to have a box of a different color around
some widgets (e.g. latest gnome-clocks design)
If you want to get rounded corners on an hbox, instead of
:first-child {
border-top-left-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 5px;
}
:last-child {
border-top-right-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 5px;
}
you now need to write:
:first-child, :last-child:dir(rtl) {
border-top-left-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 5px;
}
:last-child, :first-child:dir(rtl)
{
border-top-right-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 5px;
}
If you want to get rounded corners on an hbox, instead of
:first-child {
border-top-left-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 5px;
}
:last-child {
border-top-right-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 5px;
}
you now need to write:
:first-child, :last-child:dir(rtl) {
border-top-left-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 5px;
}
:last-child, :first-child:dir(rtl)
{
border-top-right-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 5px;
}
If you want to get rounded corners on an hbox, instead of
:first-child {
border-top-left-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 5px;
}
:last-child {
border-top-right-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 5px;
}
you now need to write:
:first-child, :last-child:dir(rtl) {
border-top-left-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 5px;
}
:last-child, :first-child:dir(rtl) {
border-top-right-radius: 5px;
border-bottom-right-radius: 5px;
}
