We want to split nodes into containers and nodes that do actual drawing.
So pushing nodes that do drawing is exactly the wrong thing.
Also fix up GtkPopover. There's no need for it to push anything.
Add a new ::measure vfunc similar to GtkCssGadget's that widget
implementations have to override instead of the old get_preferred_width,
get_preferred_height, get_preferred_width_for_height,
get_preferred_height_for_width and
get_preferred_height_and_baseline_for_width.
And with it, gtk_widget_get_visual() and gtk_widget_set_visual() are
gone.
We now always use the RGBA visual (if available) and otherwise fall back
to the system visual.
The relative-to widget may be reparented itself into/out of a
scrollable. In this cases make the hierachy-changed handler to
unset the parent scrollable when unparented, and look up again
the parent scrollable after it's reparented.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771812
gtk_popover_set_scrollable_full() takes care of the signal connected
on the scrollable itself, in addition to the adjustment signals the
popover listens to.
gtk_popover_update_scrollable() looks up the current relative-to
widget hierarchy and updates the current scrollable.
The places where the scrollable is being maintained have been updated
to use these functions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771812
Since we're using _get_rect_coords in size-allocate when allocating the
size of the child widget, use the newly introduced _get_rect_for_size to
calculate the difference between the passed size_for and the one we're
supposed to pass on to the child widget.
When calculating the requested size of a popover, we need to do the
exact same same thing _get_rect_coords did, but not for the
current popopver allocation. Add _get_rect_for_size that can be used for
this purpose
The effect of transitions-enabled=true can now be
achieved using gtk_popover_popup/popdown and the effect
of transitions-enabled=false can be achieved using
gtk_widget_show/hide.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769706
Since not chaining up in gtk_widget_show/gtk_widget_hide is not allowed,
we can't just implicitly delay the hiding in GtkPopover's hide
implementation. Fix this by introducing gtk_popover_popup() and
gtk_popover_popdown() to show or hide a popover with transition and
revert GtkPopover's show/hide implementation to apply their effect
without the transition.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769706
If there are widget margins set, the whole popover will be displaced.
However the calculation of the tail position doesn't have this into
account, ending up with the tail being detached from the popover if
the margin grew too big.
We should not render the arrows invariably next to the GdkWindow edge,
but optionally displaced inside it depending on the widget margins.
Fixes the gtk3-demo "Popovers" demo case, whose GtkEntry popovers set
widget margins for some reason.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767851
Commit a01fe14 changed the behaviour of popovers when the focus leaves
them to stop child popovers being hidden when the focus leaves their
parent. However they are now a bit too reluctant to hide - if the
focus passes to an unrelated popover the first popover is not
hidden. Also if the focus passes to another widget that does not
perform a gtk grab then the popover isn't hidden until the user
presses a non-movement key or clicks outside the popover.
The solution is to go back to checking if the focused widget is a
descendant of the popover, but to include popovers and their related
widgets in the ancestry chain.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765595
If the popover's relative-to widget is unparented/reparented, we end
up unparenting/reparenting the popover as well. In that case, at the
moment of reparenting, the widget might have been visible (and is
thus mapped again), but priv->window hasn't been set yet.
We must first set priv->window, and then call gtk_window_add_popover(),
that way gtk_popover_map() has its prerequisites straight.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766323
If the background is transparent, we can't use it for the input shape,
since that will be empty. Draw a box with rounded corners irectly
instead, in fully opaque black.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759905
Otherwise the gtk_grab_remove() calls on widget destruction will happen
on the default window group, which may leave the real window group
of the popover with a dangling pointer if it is not the default one.
This could be seen on the inspector, open a popover in the properties
list and close the window with alt-F4.
Under X11, popovers are always constrained to the toplevel
window. Under Wayland, they aren't. This commit adds a
property that allows to explicitly constrain popovers to
the toplevel, giving them the same behavior under Wayland
as under X11.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757474
Call gtk_popover_update_position instead which will pick up the new
transition_diff value and pass it on to
_gtk_window_set_popover_position, which in turn will move the window
correctly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755435
These days exposure happens only on the native windows (generally the
toplevel window) and is propagated down recursively. The expose event
is only useful for backwards compat, and in fact, for double buffered
widgets we totally ignore the event (and non-double buffering breaks
on wayland).
So, by not setting the mask we avoid emitting these events and then
later ignoring them.
We still keep it on eventbox, fixed and layout as these are used
in weird ways that want backwards compat.
