This call has everything to perform activation as specified by the
xdg_activation protocol, notably a surface to activate as opposed to
gdk_display_notify_startup_complete().
Make activation happen here, so that the surface gets activated when
its gets a startup ID assigned.
The argument to xdg_activation_token_v1_set_surface is documented to be the
surface requesting the activation, not the surface to be activated, which is
given later when calling xdg_activation_v1_activate.
(c.f. 36cee4bdbc)
Use the same logic as in gdk_wayland_app_launch_context_get_startup_notify_id,
i.e. if we have a surface with focus, set that, otherwise set NULL.
This fixes requesting urgent/focus on wlroots (compositors like Sway, etc.),
which was blocked as the surface requesting the activation didn't have focus.
Signed-off-by: Joan Bruguera <joanbrugueram@gmail.com>
By using wl_output_release(), GDK lets the compositor to clean up the
output global more nicely.
For example, currently, most compositors remove the global and then
destroy it later after N seconds expire. With this, the compositor could
experiment with destroying the output global once all its resources are
destroyed.
There's 2 things broken here:
- The mask was calculated on top of the GDK button (i.e. skipping
4-7 buttons), so GDK_BUTTON4_MASK and GDK_BUTTON5_MASK were not
assigned. This is now calculated on the (continuous) BTN_ evcodes
so it is guaranteed that the next 2 physical buttons (i.e.
back/forward) get these two places in the mask assigned.
- Furthermore, these buttons would be pushed to places in the
modifier mask that they didn't belong to. It is now checked hard
that only the first 5 buttons enable a modifier flag.
Overall, this ensures that no event masks with bonkers values are
forwarded, and that no stale implicit grabs are left after additional
buttons are pressed.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5301
When getting the serial for primary/clipboard selections we used a
function that largely relied on a GdkEvent being passed. We have
another available function that looks up the most recent serial
given the ongoing touch/tablet input as well.
This is the second best, compared to actually knowing the
input/device from the event that was received by the UI an triggered
the clipboard operation, and is already in use in other places
(e.g. window dragging). It is valid for these situations too.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5250
We shouldn't assume there is always a monitor to derive bounds from.
If there is no monitor, pass empty bounds, as this matches what
xdg_toplevel.configure_bounds do in this case.
As far as I'm aware, these only exist with `gdk_wayland_surface_` names
for historical reasons, before these types were split.
This way, those functions will be able to access members of the
`GdkWaylandToplevel` struct. And it just saves a few lines of code.
`apply_monitor_change()` already calls `update_scale()`.
Note that this only affects old compositor versions (see
`should_update_monitor()`) so it's just a minor cleanup.
Starting with the Wayland protocol wl_pointer >= 8, discrete axis
events have been deprecated in favour of high-resolution scroll event.
Add a listener for high-resolution scroll events and, for backwards
compatibility, handle discrete events as discrete*120.
Even though the argument is non-nullable, GTK sometimes incurs in that
by itself by destroying the surface while the event is in flight. This
is the case of popping down a GtkDropdown. When this happens we simply
ignore the crossing event, but we should let it through instead, the
compositor did not send it in vain and we possibly still have pointer
state to undo.
Drop the surface checks, so that the event is propagated along GTK.
Following what was done for pinch/swipe events, give hold gestures their
own distinct sequence as well. Without this it was NULL, which was already
distinct to other touchpad gestures.
This serial should be that from a button press/touch down/etc, use
the last implicit grab here, which will presumably be from the same
device that triggered the event.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/5048
The GdkToplevelSize struct already has the concept of "bounds", which
means the largest size a window should reasonably have. It's practically
the equivalent of the monitor the window is intended to be mapped on,
with the "struts" (e.g. panels) cut out. It's used by GTK to use this
information to calculate a default window size that is "lagom" (swedish;
not too large, not too small).
