Make gtk_popover_new_from_model() return a GtkPopoverMenu,
rename it to gtk_popover_menu_new_from_model() and add
a relative_to argument to gtk_popover_menu_new().
Update all callers.
We can't improve popover menus as long as we
have to be able to work with any old popover
we're given. Remove this, so we can make
gtk_popover_new_from_model return a subclass.
We were queuing an allocation whenever
the popover is flipped over, unnecessarily,
since we don't change the size of the surface.
This was showing up as popovers being invisible
when flipped over, under X.
We want to use a gdk_surface_new_popup for popups,
and align the constructor names with the surface
types, so rename
gdk_surface_new_popup -> gdk_surface_new_temp
gdk_surface_new_popup_full -> gdk_surface_new_popup
The temp surface type will disappear eventually.
Otherwise we're getting warnings about allocating a widget we haven't
measured first, which is fair. The contents gizmo itself will later take
care about whether or not the real popover child is NULL.
This is better than nothing at all. The wording is taken from Carlos's
commit message when he added this shortly before 3.12 (but skip Since).
Skip the bit from his commit message explaining what this replaced; we
don't need to say all the less good things our convenience API replaces.
This has been broken since we switched key event delivery to follow
the same semantics than pointer/touch. There, GTK+ grabs will influence
the topmost widget during event delivery, rendering the toplevel
unable to handle key navigation. The toplevel must handle those key
events in an explicit manner then.
We don't render the keyboard focus rectangle yet, but I assume that's
something else.
That code branch is meant to check for key events, seems obvious we want
GDK_KEY_PRESS, not GDK_BUTTON_PRESS (which also broke the branch right
below).
Makes us all able to dismiss popovers again.
Now that queue_draw() isn't restricted to clip anymore, we don't need to
care about clip in the CSS engine either.
We do keep GTK_CSS_AFFECTS_CLIP around though because GtkWindow does
care for the window's size.
If you want transparent region, you can just render them transparent.
If you want input shaping, use gdk_surface_input_shape_combine_region().
Also remove gtk_widget_shape_combine_region().
This is an automated change doing these command:
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_has_window gtk_widget_set_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_has_window gtk_widget_get_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_parent_window gtk_widget_set_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_parent_window gtk_widget_get_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_window gtk_widget_set_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_window gtk_widget_get_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_register_window gtk_widget_register_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_unregister_window gtk_widget_unregister_surface
git checkout NEWS*
This renames the GdkWindow class and related classes (impl, backend
subclasses) to surface. Additionally it renames related types:
GdkWindowAttr, GdkWindowPaint, GdkWindowWindowClass, GdkWindowType,
GdkWindowTypeHint, GdkWindowHints, GdkWindowState, GdkWindowEdge
This is an automatic conversion using the below commands:
git sed -f g GdkWindowWindowClass GdkSurfaceSurfaceClass
git sed -f g GdkWindow GdkSurface
git sed -f g "gdk_window\([ _\(\),;]\|$\)" "gdk_surface\1" # Avoid hitting gdk_windowing
git sed -f g "GDK_WINDOW\([ _\(]\|$\)" "GDK_SURFACE\1" # Avoid hitting GDK_WINDOWING
git sed "GDK_\([A-Z]*\)IS_WINDOW\([_ (]\|$\)" "GDK_\1IS_SURFACE\2"
git sed GDK_TYPE_WINDOW GDK_TYPE_SURFACE
git sed -f g GdkPointerWindowInfo GdkPointerSurfaceInfo
git sed -f g "BROADWAY_WINDOW" "BROADWAY_SURFACE"
git sed -f g "broadway_window" "broadway_surface"
git sed -f g "BroadwayWindow" "BroadwaySurface"
git sed -f g "WAYLAND_WINDOW" "WAYLAND_SURFACE"
git sed -f g "wayland_window" "wayland_surface"
git sed -f g "WaylandWindow" "WaylandSurface"
git sed -f g "X11_WINDOW" "X11_SURFACE"
git sed -f g "x11_window" "x11_surface"
git sed -f g "X11Window" "X11Surface"
git sed -f g "WIN32_WINDOW" "WIN32_SURFACE"
git sed -f g "win32_window" "win32_surface"
git sed -f g "Win32Window" "Win32Surface"
git sed -f g "QUARTZ_WINDOW" "QUARTZ_SURFACE"
git sed -f g "quartz_window" "quartz_surface"
git sed -f g "QuartzWindow" "QuartzSurface"
git checkout NEWS* po-properties
Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
This patch makes that work using 1 of 2 options:
1. Add all missing enums to the switch statement
or
2. Cast the switch argument to a uint to avoid having to do that (mostly
for GdkEventType).
I even found a bug while doing that: clearing a GtkImage with a surface
did not notify thae surface property.
The reason for enabling this flag even though it is tedious at times is
that it is very useful when adding values to an enum, because it makes
GTK immediately warn about all the switch statements where this enum is
relevant.
And I expect changes to enums to be frequent during the GTK4 development
cycle.
Subsurfaces don't currently work with our new rendering,
and this makes popovers unusable. We can go back to using
subsurfaces for popovers when this is fixed.
.update_position() enforces that non-Wayland platforms must position a
Popover within its parent Window. We use the allocation of the Window
to translate the position and check for overshoot on each of its sides.
Calling Widget.get_allocation() of a CSD Window includes its shadows.
But shadows were not excluded from the area in which we can position.
Thus, Popovers could get positioned in the shadow of CSD windows, where,
at least on X11, no input is received. Therefore, positioning a Popover
over a shadow meant its child widgets within that area became unusable.
Fix by calling Window.get_shadow() and including it in the overshoot on
each side. This adjusts for how the allocation includes shadows, making
overshoots with and without shadows the same. Thus, we avoid considering
shadows as viable for positioning, favouring a side where input works.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786209
When the popover is dismissed, we return the focus to
where it came from. However, by using gtk_widget_grab_focus,
we were messing up the selection if that widget happens to
be an entry. Special-case GtkEntry and use
gtk_entry_grab_focus_without_selecting to avoid this issue.
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
Remove the special case in gtkwidget.c where we didn't draw any css
background/border for popovers. Instead, rely on themes to not style the
popover node and add a contents gizmo that gets the actual css styling.
We then requeste enough space for the popover to draw both the contents
and the arrow on the side.
We now rely on toplevels receiving and forwarding all the events
the windowing should be able to handle. Event masks are no longer a
way to determine whether an event is deliverable ot a widget.
Events will always be delivered in the three captured/target/bubbled
phases, widgets can now just attach GtkEventControllers and let those
handle the events.
Creating with `gtk_popover_new_from_model` should be exactly the same as
if via `gtk_popover_new` plus `gtk_popover_bind_model`.
Also remove the style if the model is unbound at any point.
Instead of making people intiialize a rectangle and then applying border
radius manually, provide a constructor that does it for them.
While doing that, also allow people to instead request the padding box
or the content box.
Refactor all relevant code to use this new constructor.
We want to split nodes into containers and nodes that do actual drawing.
So pushing nodes that do drawing is exactly the wrong thing.
Also fix up GtkPopover. There's no need for it to push anything.
Add a new ::measure vfunc similar to GtkCssGadget's that widget
implementations have to override instead of the old get_preferred_width,
get_preferred_height, get_preferred_width_for_height,
get_preferred_height_for_width and
get_preferred_height_and_baseline_for_width.
And with it, gtk_widget_get_visual() and gtk_widget_set_visual() are
gone.
We now always use the RGBA visual (if available) and otherwise fall back
to the system visual.
The relative-to widget may be reparented itself into/out of a
scrollable. In this cases make the hierachy-changed handler to
unset the parent scrollable when unparented, and look up again
the parent scrollable after it's reparented.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771812
gtk_popover_set_scrollable_full() takes care of the signal connected
on the scrollable itself, in addition to the adjustment signals the
popover listens to.
gtk_popover_update_scrollable() looks up the current relative-to
widget hierarchy and updates the current scrollable.
The places where the scrollable is being maintained have been updated
to use these functions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771812
Since we're using _get_rect_coords in size-allocate when allocating the
size of the child widget, use the newly introduced _get_rect_for_size to
calculate the difference between the passed size_for and the one we're
supposed to pass on to the child widget.
When calculating the requested size of a popover, we need to do the
exact same same thing _get_rect_coords did, but not for the
current popopver allocation. Add _get_rect_for_size that can be used for
this purpose
The effect of transitions-enabled=true can now be
achieved using gtk_popover_popup/popdown and the effect
of transitions-enabled=false can be achieved using
gtk_widget_show/hide.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769706
Since not chaining up in gtk_widget_show/gtk_widget_hide is not allowed,
we can't just implicitly delay the hiding in GtkPopover's hide
implementation. Fix this by introducing gtk_popover_popup() and
gtk_popover_popdown() to show or hide a popover with transition and
revert GtkPopover's show/hide implementation to apply their effect
without the transition.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769706
If there are widget margins set, the whole popover will be displaced.
However the calculation of the tail position doesn't have this into
account, ending up with the tail being detached from the popover if
the margin grew too big.
We should not render the arrows invariably next to the GdkWindow edge,
but optionally displaced inside it depending on the widget margins.
Fixes the gtk3-demo "Popovers" demo case, whose GtkEntry popovers set
widget margins for some reason.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767851
Commit a01fe14 changed the behaviour of popovers when the focus leaves
them to stop child popovers being hidden when the focus leaves their
parent. However they are now a bit too reluctant to hide - if the
focus passes to an unrelated popover the first popover is not
hidden. Also if the focus passes to another widget that does not
perform a gtk grab then the popover isn't hidden until the user
presses a non-movement key or clicks outside the popover.
The solution is to go back to checking if the focused widget is a
descendant of the popover, but to include popovers and their related
widgets in the ancestry chain.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765595
If the popover's relative-to widget is unparented/reparented, we end
up unparenting/reparenting the popover as well. In that case, at the
moment of reparenting, the widget might have been visible (and is
thus mapped again), but priv->window hasn't been set yet.
We must first set priv->window, and then call gtk_window_add_popover(),
that way gtk_popover_map() has its prerequisites straight.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766323
If the background is transparent, we can't use it for the input shape,
since that will be empty. Draw a box with rounded corners irectly
instead, in fully opaque black.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759905
Otherwise the gtk_grab_remove() calls on widget destruction will happen
on the default window group, which may leave the real window group
of the popover with a dangling pointer if it is not the default one.
This could be seen on the inspector, open a popover in the properties
list and close the window with alt-F4.
Under X11, popovers are always constrained to the toplevel
window. Under Wayland, they aren't. This commit adds a
property that allows to explicitly constrain popovers to
the toplevel, giving them the same behavior under Wayland
as under X11.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757474
Call gtk_popover_update_position instead which will pick up the new
transition_diff value and pass it on to
_gtk_window_set_popover_position, which in turn will move the window
correctly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755435
These days exposure happens only on the native windows (generally the
toplevel window) and is propagated down recursively. The expose event
is only useful for backwards compat, and in fact, for double buffered
widgets we totally ignore the event (and non-double buffering breaks
on wayland).
So, by not setting the mask we avoid emitting these events and then
later ignoring them.
We still keep it on eventbox, fixed and layout as these are used
in weird ways that want backwards compat.
Instead, inherit style from toplevel (because that's the default way,
not because it makes lots of sense).
This way, popovers don't inherit the styling from the widget that popped
them up, which is a problem in selected listbox rows, selection-mode
headerbars.
It also doesn't inherit styling where we might want it, like the osd.
But we can only have one of the two things.
