Some backends (namely Wayland) do not support global coordinates so
using the window position to determine the monitor will always fail on
such backends.
In such cases, the backend itself might be better suited to identify
the monitor a given window resides on.
Add a vfunc get_monitor_at_window() to the display class so that we can
use the backend to retrieve the monitor, if the backend implements it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766566
It turns out that it is too hard (and in some cases, impossible)
to get this information from node positioning, so bring back the
.scale-has-marks-above/below style classes on the main node.
This should allow us to fix the 'pointy sliders'.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766440
The GdkDragContext should only listen to GDK_GRAB_BROKEN events sent to
its own pointer device. It turns out that the passive key grabs mistake
GDK into sending a GdkEventGrabBroken on the master keyboard, which the
DnD machinery mistakes as a signal to cancel the operation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766442
Only generate crossing events on wl_touch.down for the virtual master
device used for touch events, and only whenever this virtual device
actually moves across surfaces. This behavior resembles better what is
expected in X11, where the pointer is warped to the touch position
on XITouchBegin.
This avoids the double emission of leave events when the pointer
emulating touch is lifted, that crossing event will be instead
generated when/if the focus surface changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766314
This is required for proper integration with any other library/application that
may perform wayland API calls and poll() the wayland fd from multiple threads.
Using wl_display_dispatch{_queue}() is thread-safe if not mixed with custom
poll() usage, which GSource/GMainContext does.
Essentially, the problem is that multiple threads polling and reading
the same fd is extremely racy. Use the wayland provided API for allowing
concurrent access to the wayland display fd.
See the wayland man pages for wl_display_prepare_read(),
wl_display_cancel_read() and wl_display_read_events() for more details.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763852
GtkScrolledWindow leans towards using the minimum size of its child
widget, unless the scrollbar policy is GTK_POLICY_NEVER. This is
probably fine for most GtkScrollable implementations out there.
Especially when using GTK_SCROLL_MINIMUM, which is the default for all
implementations inside gtk+.
However, this is not good for GTK_SCROLL_NATURAL children. eg.,
VteTerminal's minimum size is 1x1 and natural size is the number of
visible rows and columns requested by the user. We really want to use
the natural size unless the user has resized the window to change that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766569
This code tries to add the minimum content size, if one is set, to the
GtkScrolledWindow's size requisition. This is obvious from the check
for non-negative values of min-content-height and min-content-width.
Using MAX needlessly makes the code harder to read by implying that
there is more to it when there actually isn't.
Fall out from 0d9ebb501dhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766569
When we are beginning to calculate the height, if the vscrollbar_policy
is not GTK_POLICY_NEVER, and there is no min-content-height, then we
need some small non-zero value to get started. The idea is to always
ask for at least enough to fit the horizontal scrollbar.
Simply put, this should be the mirror image of the corresponding width
calculation code.
Those who got used to the buggy behaviour might notice that their
GtkScrolledWindows are not as tall as they used to be.
Fall out from 55196a705fhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766530
Sometimes on wayland we're seeing a frame draw before the first tick
callback, where the window position has not yet been updated.
With this change, the window is properly positioned as soon as
gtk_stack_start_transition returns.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766405
Fix testsuite/a11y/about.ui GtkAboutDialog :
"CRITICAL **: atk_hyperlink_get_start_index: assertion 'ATK_IS_HYPERLINK (link)' failed"
That is set widget->priv->accessible as soon as accessible object is generated.
When accessible object is created accessible->priv->widget is set,
if widget->priv->accessible is not , then _gtk_label_accessible_update_links
exits early, thus without creating the links on the accessible side.
(This as it checks for the widget to have the accessible set before proceeding).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766458
GTK used to not emit GtkWidget::style-updated on widgets that weren't
realized. This sped up construction of complex widgetry in the early
days of GTK3 where we instantly invalidated on every change.
We don't do that anymore, so in theory (and in my limited testing with
widget-factory) this shouldn't be a prolem anymore.
What is a problem though is that postponing style-updated leads to 2
problems:
(1) Unrealized widgets will not emit style-updated which may cause them
to not properly update their state and return wrong values from
get_preferred_width/height() etc
(2) Emitting style-updated during realize can happen too late.
When a widget is not made child-visible by its parent (common
examples: notebook, paned) it will also not be realized when the
parent is initially shown. However, when they get realized later
(after a resize of the parent), they will emit style-updated (and
potentially queue a resize) during size-allocate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765700
Cancelling the gesture causes the last_event pointer to become
invalid. Make a copy of the event so we can keep using it
regardless of the gesture state.
At one point, the sidebar was using gtk_treeview_set_tooltip_column,
which expects tooltips to be markup. With the listbox-based sidebar,
we don't do that anymore. So don't escape the tooltip text.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766175
We're measuring both the width of the minimal and the maximal value for
the value gadget, but only give the value the minimal width for its
current value, resultnig in an always left-aligned value.
Fix this by assigning the width of the value gadget to the value layout
and letting pango align the text inside the layout.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766120
Menus are placed vertically by definition, it does not make much sense
to support horizontal axis for scrolling.
Use GDK_EVENT_STOP/GDK_EVENT_PROPAGATE instead of TRUE/FALSE and add a
default case to return GDK_EVENT_PROPAGATE for unhandled events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765939
On X11, we get both smooth and emulated scroll events, whereas other
backends such as wayland will give smooth events only with touchpad
scrolling.
Discard emulated scroll events so that we get consistent behaviours
between backends.
Allow for both horizontal and vertical smooth events for scrolling so
that horizontal scrolling still works without emulated scroll events as
well, again for consistency between gdk backends.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765939
