Rename the surface getter to peek, following other render
node getters, and make the surface-based constructor private,
since it is not something we want to encourage.
Update all callers.
The gtk_tools variable is an array of arrays; adding a new element
requires to maintain the same type, or we'll get a build failure when
we try to extract the newly added element.
Add the necessary machinery into the Meson definition files so that we
can build for Windows.
Since we don't have Wayland or X support for our use case here, disable
them once we know that we are building for Windows, as they are
(otherwise) enabled by default, and enable the items that need to be
built for Windows builds.
Exclude gtk4-launch from Windows builds as that is something that
is not supported on Windows.
As we won't have gio-unix on Windows, and PangoFT2 is optional, don't use
fallbacks for them when we are on Windows (but do use fallbacks for
gio-win32, as it will be used).
Also, clean up meson.build a bit as we can just force-include
msvc_recommended_pragmas.h from GLib since we depend on GLib, and so we
can handle these warnings from msvc_recommended_pragmas.h instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785210
What is missing is the "allocation" part of x/y coordinates. Since
gtk_entry_realize doesn't call gtk_widget_set_window(priv->text_area),
the coordinates returned by gdk_window_get_origin don't include it.
This patch fixes this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=784509
Bug 737175 aimed to ensure that scrolling up on a horizontal range would
result in its value increasing, as that’s what users intuitively expect.
However, its commit 416c370da1 meant that,
if the event gives scroll deltas, we inverted our delta unconditionally.
So it broke horizontal scrolling: scrolling left moved the slider right…
We must only invert if using dy as delta. dx already has the right sign,
so inverting it was wrong.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788905
The gtk_widget_get_display call in this if statement is showing up in
profiles. It ends up walking up the hierarchy to the toplevel to get its
GdkScreen, etc. so it is relatively costly. Avoid that call in most
cases by first checking if the RESIZE debugging is enabled for any of
the displays and only then checking if it is enabled for the widget's
display.
If the call to set_parent() failed, we were still adding the child to
the internal list of children, despite that it was not really added.
That meant we could later try to do invalid stuff with that non-child.
Fix that by asserting and giving up if the child that the user is
attempting to add is already parented.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701296
The language is useful for parsing tools, such as that of gtkmm, which
otherwise assumes these are C snippets and elides them from its
generated documentation.
It was used to mark css properties that affect widgets with text, but it
caused unnecessary invalidations. E.g. 'color' was marked as
AFFECTS_TEXT but changing just the color of a label should not
automatically queue a resize, which is what the code in
gtk_widget_real_style_updated does.
Replace this flag with GTK_CSS_AFFECTS_TEXT_SIZE and
GTK_CSS_AFFECTS_TEXT_CLIP, which GtkWidget can use only if the widget
actually has text.
After a gesture first claims, and later rejects a touch sequence,
a press event will be propagated further along. However propagation
got messed up since we only emitted as far as the toplevel.
It does not hurt us to keep middle clicks doing the same
as shift-primary clicks. This makes the transition from gtk2
less painful in terms of muscle memory.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787669
Clarifies the code and helps catch invalid enum values before they
propagate further. Also add a comment about why two seemingly legitimate
values are not handled there (they’re handled higher up in the file).
Coverity CID: 1457700
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788787
gtk_box_pack_end will put the label child at the right side of the label
(in LTR orientation), but we want it left, directly next to the icon.
Also remove the spacing from the box child as this is a theme thing.
~Company ╡ so TL;DR: we put the static style in the cache, but then
⤷ ╡ compute a child style from the animated style in the cache
⤷ ╡ and we put the child style also in the cache (because
⤷ ╡ it's not animated)
⤷ ╡ then we run the animation, but reuse the cache every time
⤷ ╡ for both child and parent
⤷ ╡ so after the animation is done, we end up with a cache that
⤷ ╡ has the correct static style for the parent but an
⤷ ╡ incorrect static style for the child
⤷ ╡ because that static style was computed from the
⤷ ╡ initial animated style
This fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763517
An empty container has the same effect as transparency
with the cairo renderer, but creates black with Vulkan.
To avoid this, explicitly use a transparent color node.
This fixes the css blendmode example in gtk4-demo with
the Vulkan renderer.
As Timm Baedert pointed out, the previous fix made the
menubar go on top of popovers, which is just wrong. Instead,
make gtk_window_snapshot handle all direct children of the
window, taking care to stack popovers correctly.
This is important since _push_state returns a pointer into a GArray
which could be invalidated and point to garbage after the subsequent
push_state call.
