The other method annotations were removed in commit c306e448b3.
There is no introspected ABI change, as g-ir-scanner would just ignore
the annotation.
This eliminates the last warning when building GTK on Linux.
When building dependencies as subprojects we need to tell the
introspection scanner where to find the introspection data; this
means using GIR targets from the subproject.
Functional revert of commit 9c4892f291.
Fixes introspection scanner warnings like:
Warning: Gtk: gtk_drag_finish: Methods must belong to the same
namespace as the class they belong to
That is, the gtk_drag_* functions cannot be methods as they have a
"GdkDragContext" as the instance parameter, and that is not a valid
type for the Gtk namespace.
This is not an introspected ABI change, as the generated introspection
data ignores the annotation.
Signed-off-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@gnome.org>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692152
Instead of using `--include-uninstalled` in the scanner arguments, we
can tell Meson to use an introspection target, and it'll do the
appropriate thing for us.
Contrary to what the comments in this function might suggest, it does
not actually do anything about child positions, child child sizes. So,
packing doesn't matter and we don't need to iterate over all child
widgets twice.
And remove the non-NULL checks for minimum_size and natural_size since
these are non-NULL by definition since this function is only called from
measure().
Calling gtk_menu_item_get_label on a GtkSeparatorMenuItem would
otherwise create a GtkLabel child, increasing the vertical size request
to that of the child label.
Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
Avoid the ugly priv->tool_box==NULL check in ::add (and ::remove) by
just not using template xml for this small class. Also, make sure the
GtkBin child is properly set and implement remove to also properly
remove it. Remove the manual widget margins and add some CSS for it.
Also switch to simply using a GtkCenterBox.
GdkContentFormatsBuilder is currently not introspectable, as it does not
have a GType. We can turn it into a boxed type, but we need to implement
memory management for it.
The current gdk_content_formats_builder_free() function returns a newly
constructed value, so we cannot use it as a GBoxedFreeFunc; additionally
copying a GdkContentFormatsBuilder contents would make it a bit odd, as
you could get multiple identical GdkContentFormats out of the copies.
A simple approach is to model the GdkContentFormatsBuilder API to follow
the GBytes one: use reference counting for memory management, and have
a function to release a reference, return a GdkContentFormats, and reset
the GdkContentFormatsBuilder state.
For language bindings, we can provide a get_formats() function that
returns the GdkContentFormats instance and resets the builder instance,
leaving the reference count untouched.
For C convenience we can keep gdk_content_formats_builder_free(), and
make it a wrapper around gdk_content_formats_builder_get_formats(), with
the guarantee that it'll free the builder instance regardless of its
current reference count.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793097https://blogs.gnome.org/otte/2018/02/03/builders/
The result won't be visible anyway. This also prevents problems with
widgets that create some resource the size of the widget, like
GtkGLArea. It also keeps us from snapshotting revealers with
size 0.
GDK has a lock to mark critical sections inside the backends.
Additionally, code that would re-enter into the GTK main loop was
supposed to hold the lock.
Back in the Good Old Days™ this was guaranteed to kind of work only on
the X11 backend, and would cause a neat explosion on any other GDK
backend.
During GTK+ 3.x we deprecated the API to enter and leave the critical
sections, and now we can remove all the internal uses of the lock, since
external API that uses GTK+ 4.x won't be able to hold the GDK lock.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793124
The main GDK thread lock is not portable and deprecated.
The only reason why gdk_threads_add_timeout() and
gdk_threads_add_timeout_full() exist is to allow invoking a callback
with the GDK lock held, in case 3rd party libraries still use the
deprecated gdk_threads_enter()/gdk_threads_leave() API.
Since we're removing the GDK lock, and we're releasing a new major API,
such code cannot exist any more; this means we can use the GLib API for
installing timeout callbacks.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793124
The main GDK thread lock is not portable and deprecated.
The only reason why gdk_threads_add_idle() and
gdk_threads_add_idle_full() exist is to allow invoking a callback with
the GDK lock held, in case 3rd party libraries still use the deprecated
gdk_threads_enter()/gdk_threads_leave() API.
Since we're removing the GDK lock, and we're releasing a new major API,
such code cannot exist any more; this means we can use the GLib API for
installing idle callbacks.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793124
We need to have two lists: one, with the list of sources that need to be
introspected; and one with the list of sources that contain only private
symbols.
This reduces the amount of source files that the introspection scanner
needs to traverse, and thus the build time.
