Otherwise the event is possibly handled, but still propagated further anyway.
Ensure the event is consumed by claiming the current sequence on the
GtkGestureMultiPress::pressed handler.
::row-activated only used to be triggered by GDK_BUTTON_PRIMARY, so make
the multipress gesture handling this now to be only triggered by that same
button.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731020
This gesture was only meant to react on GDK_BUTTON_PRIMARY (either
through real pointer events, or implicitly assumed from touch events),
as it used to behave before gestures. Otherwise the gtk_drag_begin*()
call assumes being triggered by button 1, and the drag misbehaves
because that button isn't really in the state mask.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731016
When going from attribute mapping to model, it makes most sense
to go directly to the data tab, and when going from an action
name to the owner, we want to show the actions tab. Make it so.
The extra condition here that caused the current child to
not redraw during reordering was introduced in f383e1f1
during the port to ::draw, but was not explained in the
commit message, and removing it has no obvious negative
effect.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730767
Just calling get_type() does not ensure that the signals, properties
and everything else gets set up properly. Ensure it is, by calling
g_type_class_ref() before using the type. This fixes the testcase
added in the previous commit.
Those might trigger the destruction of some widget that would dispose the
event controller while the event is still being handled, so keep an extra
ref on the controller during event processing.
Without this information introspection-based consumers don't realize
they can include context information, but instead think that they
receive an extra gpointer argument (which they don't know how to
handle).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730745
This will hopefully help resolve the circular dependency between
libgtk linking against inspector/libgtkinspector and inspector/
needing extract-strings from gtk/.
I didn't preserve the EXEEXT decorations in this operation -
automake gave me stern warnings about it, so I just dropped them
all. Somebody who cross-builds GTK+ will have to reconstruct this.
This prevents some of our generic object implementation tests
from working with gesture objects. Instead, add g_return_if_fail
checks in all the gesture constructors.
Mainly doing s/TARGET/BUBBLE/ on the fully ported widgets, but GtkTreeView
where the double click handler has moved to GTK_PHASE_TARGET so it runs
parallelly to the still existing event handlers.
Previously, there would be globally just a capture and a bubble phase,
with the event just going down the hierarchy once, and the up once.
GTK_PHASE_TARGET actually meaning "run within event handlers", so in
a hierarchy of 3 widgets, emission would be:
Capture(C)
Capture(B)
Capture(A)
Target(A) (if event handlers allow)
Bubble(A)
Target(B) (if event handlers allow)
Bubble(B)
Target(C) (if event handlers allow)
Bubble(C)
This commit changes this behavior and uses GTK_PHASE_TARGET in a less
misleading way, running only on the widget that was meant to receive
the event. And GTK_PHASE_BUBBLE has taken over the execution place of
GTK_PHASE_TARGET, so the emission remains:
Capture(C)
Capture(B)
Capture(A)
Target(A)
Bubble(A) (if event handlers allow)
Bubble(B) (...)
Bubble(C) (...)
As it was, GTK_PHASE_BUBBLE was useful for running event controllers
paralelly to event handlers, without modifying a single line in those.
For those mixed scenarios, Any of the other phases will have to be
used at discretion, or the event handlers eventually changed to chain
up and let the default event handlers in GtkWidget to be run.
The events to those are fed outside the regular event propagation scheme,
through _gtk_window_check_handle_wm_event(), so set the controller to
GTK_PHASE_NONE so events aren't processed first manually, and then
automatically.
