It was used to mark css properties that affect widgets with text, but it
caused unnecessary invalidations. E.g. 'color' was marked as
AFFECTS_TEXT but changing just the color of a label should not
automatically queue a resize, which is what the code in
gtk_widget_real_style_updated does.
Replace this flag with GTK_CSS_AFFECTS_TEXT_SIZE and
GTK_CSS_AFFECTS_TEXT_CLIP, which GtkWidget can use only if the widget
actually has text.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=791281
This previously only mentioned its effect on the displayed value, and
even after the previous commit, its rounding of the actual value upon
change still reads like too much of an afterthought. Worse, it wasn’t
mentioned at all in the doc for the @digits parameter. Change this to
emphasise rounding always occurs and the displayed value is secondary.
Whether it should is an open question, but for now, the documentation
should clearly indicate that currently rounding is only applied upon
changes to the value, not to the existing value when ::digits changes.
This is already clear in the doc for the underlying Range::round-digits.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358970
The documents state that gtk_scale_set_digits() “causes the value of the
adjustment to be rounded off to this number of digits, so the retrieved
value matches the value the user saw.” Note the lack of any condition.
But in fact, if draw-value was false, rounding was disabled on the base
Range, so values that weren’t displayed weren’t rounded. This made the
docs wrong and made an apparently cosmetic detail alter functionality.
Fix by ensuring the number of digits set on Scale is always propagated
along to gtk_range_set_round_digits(), thus rounding to it in all cases
when the value changes, regardless of whether the value is displayed.
This doesn’t address the other idea from Bugzilla: that changing the
number of digits should clamp the _existing_ value if it’s more precise.
This contradicts digits docs in the base Range, but the above from Scale
can be read as implying it’ll happen. For now, that’s an open question.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=358970
Use .marks-before/after to indicate the presence of marks.
As Lapo points out, compatibility with the previous names
is not really that important, since everything else changed
around it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766440
It turns out that it is too hard (and in some cases, impossible)
to get this information from node positioning, so bring back the
.scale-has-marks-above/below style classes on the main node.
This should allow us to fix the 'pointy sliders'.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766440
We're measuring both the width of the minimal and the maximal value for
the value gadget, but only give the value the minimal width for its
current value, resultnig in an always left-aligned value.
Fix this by assigning the width of the value gadget to the value layout
and letting pango align the text inside the layout.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766120
if (orientation) doesn't make a lot of sense but C doesn't complain and
instead evaluates orientation to TRUE for GTK_ORIENTATION_VERTICAL
(since that's 1), thus inverting the value sizes.
And add a default color like it was before.
This also fixes other issues with scale values interacting with scale
mark labels, which were buggy at least since 3.18.
The way this method is used from the GtkRange subclasses doesn't really
work well when the slider properties change as a consequence of e.g. a
style class being applied (e.g. the fine-tune style class).
In fact, there's no need to read the minimum slider size out of band,
and we can obtain the same result in a way that always work by setting a
private property on GtkRange.
