This new private API, _gtk_style_context_is_background_opaque(), is meant to
be used by internal Gtk+ wigets to optimize fast paths for cases where
applicable. One such use would be to use a CAIRO_CONTENT_COLOR surface
instead of CAIRO_CONTENT_COLOR_ALPHA.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754658
For functions that take state flags as an argument we need to special
case the situation where the passed in flags don't match the current
state.
Previously we would create a copy of the style info, change its state
and do the lookup from there.
Now that GtkCssNode has replaced style infos, this doesn't work as well
anymore as copying a GtkCssNode is not possible.
However, unike style infos, GtkCssNodes are instant-apply, so we don't
need to copy anymore, we can just change the state of the node.
This causes some invalidations to be queued, but we can take that
performance hit as this is fallback code.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1228852
We want to clear the style property cache whenever things change in the
tree, not as we previously did only when those changes actually lead to
a different CSS style.
Sometimes path nodes can survive longer than the style context that
created them. Don't crash in those cases.
Fixes startup of mutter.
Testcase included.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746407
... to a bunch of functions.
This requires a tiny change to the heuristics for the style cache - we
now cache styles when they have the same style provider as their parent
instead of when they have the default provider - but that change doesn't
have any effect in practice.
The parent refs the child, so gtk_css_node_set_parent() adds/removes a
reference.
We should probably refactor this so that we name the function
parent.add(node) instead of node.set_parent(parent) - makes the
refcounting more clear.
Instead of passing the style declaration, take the node's style
declaration. Add arguments to allow overriding the state for the one
case where this didn't work.
The code is confusing the stylecontext=>node transition, so I'll remove
it.
WIth the recent introduction of the parent style cachen, I'm not sure
it's worth it at all. Some crude benchmarking suggests a slight speedup
when removing the cache.
So no guarantees about adding it back later.
- GtkCssWidgetNode
for style contexts owned by a widget
- GtkCssPathNode
for style contexts using a GtkWidgetPath
- GtkCssTransientNode
for nodes created with gtk_style_context_save()/restore()
The functionality of it is supposed to grow, so better put it in a
custom file early.
This is just a naive split so far, the next patches will split things
further.
