The root window is a fairly X-centric concept, and it
really has no place in the GtkWidget API. Plus, this
is a rarely-used one-line convenience function with
poor documentation.
Add margin-{start,end} and gtk_widget_{get,set}_margin_{start,end}
and drop margin-{left,right} and gtk_widget_{get,set}_margin_{left,right}.
margin-{start,end} handle right also in RTL.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710238
We rename the gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal}
macros by appending a _private to their name. Otherwise, it
would be too magic to pass the 'public' names as arguments,
but affect a member of the Private struct. At the same time,
Add two new macros with the old names,
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child{_internal} that operate
on members of the instance struct.
The macros and functions are inconsistently named, and are not tied to
the "template" concept - to the point that it seems plausible to use
them without setting the template.
The new naming scheme is as follows:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_full
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback_full
With the convenience macros:
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_child_internal
gtk_widget_class_bind_template_callback
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700898https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700896
Using an offset from the struct means you can have children in
both the public and private (via G_PRIVATE_OFFSET) parts of the
instance. It also matches the new private macros nicer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702563
Signed-off-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@gnome.org>
gtk_widget_preferred_size() is only useful if you want to quickly port a
widget from GTK2 sizing code to GTK3 but does not properly work with
height-for-width as used in GTK. So we don't want to encourage people to
use it. In particular we want people to convert to height-for-width
before adding baseline support to their widgets.
Since widgets now cache drawn state we allow them to override
queue_draw_region to detect when some region of the widget
should be redrawn. For instance, if a widget draws the
background color in a pixel cache we will need to invalidate
that when the style context changes which queues a repaint.
This modifies the size machinery in order to allow baseline support.
We add a new widget vfunc get_preferred_height_and_baseline_for_width
which queries the normal height_for_width (or non-for-width if width
is -1) and additionally returns optional (-1 means "no baseline")
baselines for the minimal and natural heights.
We also add a new gtk_widget_size_allocate_with_baseline() which
baseline-aware containers can use to allocate children with a specific
baseline, either one inherited from the parent, or one introduced due
to requested baseline alignment in the container
itself. size_allocate_with_baseline() works just like a normal size
allocation, except the baseline gets recorded so that the child can
access it via gtk_widget_get_allocated_baseline() when it aligns
itself.
There are also adjust_baseline_request/allocation similar to the
allocation adjustment, and we extend the size request cache to also
store the baselines.
Setting this means baseline aware containers should align the widget
according to the baseline. For other containers this behaves like
FILL.
In order to not suprise old code with a new enum value we always
return _FILL for _BASELINE unless you specifically request it via
gtk_widget_get_valign_with_baseline().
This commit implements the needed machinery for GtkWidget
to build it's composite content from GtkBuilder XML and
adds the following API:
o gtk_widget_init_template()
An api to be called in instance initializers of any
GtkWidget subclass that uses template XML to build it's components.
o gtk_widget_class_set_template()
API to associate GtkBuilder XML to a given GtkWidget subclass
o gtk_widget_class_automate_child()
API to declare an object built by GtkBuilder to be associated
with an instance structure offset and automatically set.
o gtk_widget_get_automated_child()
API for bindings to fetch a child declared to be automated by
gtk_widget_class_automate_child(), for the case where bindings
do not generate GObjects under the hood and cannot use structure
offsets to resolve composite object pointers.
o gtk_widget_class_declare_callback[s]()
Declare static functions to be used in signal callbacks from
a given class's template XML
o gtk_widget_class_set_connect_func()
API for bindings to override the signal connection machinery
for a given GtkWidget derived class.
Deprecate gtk_widget_push_composite_child, gtk_widget_pop_composite_child,
gtk_widget_set_composite_name, gtk_widget_get_composite_name.
This API is just bloat and was never useful, this patch deprecates
it and removes all internal calls to the composite child APIs
Add a very simple GtkWidget function for an "tick" callback, which
is connected to the ::update signal of GdkFrameClock.
Remove:
- GtkTimeline. The consensus is that it is too complex.
- GdkPaintClockTarget. In the rare cases where tick callbacks
aren't sufficient, it's possible to track the
paint clock with ::realize/::unrealize/::hierarchy-changed.
GtkTimeline is kept using ::update directly to allow using a GtkTimeline
with a paint clock but no widget.
Switch GtkStyleContext to using GdkFrameClock. To do this, add a new
UPDATE phase to GdkFrameClock.
Add a GdkFrameClockTarget interface with a single set_clock() method,
and use this to deal with the fact that GtkWidget only has a frame
clock when realized.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685460
This adds gtk_widget_get/set_opacity, as well as a GtkWidget.opacity
property. Additionally it deprectates gtk_window_get/set_opacity and
removes the GtkWindow.opacity property (in preference for the new
identical inherited property from GtkWidget, which should be ABI/API
compat).
The implementation is using the new gdk_window_set_opacity child
window support for windowed widgets, and cairo_push/pop_group()
bracketing in gtk_widget_draw() for non-window widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
This replaces the previously hardcoded calls to gdk_window_set_user_data,
and also lets us track which windows are a part of a widget. Old code
should continue working as is, but new features that require the
windows may not work perfectly.
We need this for the transparent widget support to work, as we need
to specially mark the windows of child widgets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
This allows adding a GActionGroup with a given name at an arbitrary
point in the widget tree.
This patch also adds an internal _get_action_muxer() API. Calling this
will create a GActionMuxer associated with the widget. The parent of
the muxer will be the muxer of the widget's conceptual parent. For
non-menus, that is the normal parent. For menus, it is the attach
widget.
In this way, we end up with a hierarchy of GActionMuxer that largely
reflects the hierarchy of GtkWidget, but only in places that the action
context has been requested. These muxers are the ones on which the
inserted actions groups are installed.
A following patch will add a user of this API.
When I added the versioned annotation, I accidentally backdated
it, so the Deprecated: tag in the docs said 3.4, but the annotation
said 3.0. Fix it so we say 3.4 in both places.
In particular gtksettings.h and gtkstylecontext.h needed to be included
in lots of places now.
Also, I order the includes alphabetically in a bunch of headers.
This patch adds a capture phase to GTK+'s event propagation
model. Events are first propagated from the toplevel (or the
grab widget, if a grab is in place) down to the target widget
and then back up. The second phase is using the existing
::event signal, the new capture phase is using a private
API instead of a public signal for now.
This mechanism can be used in many places where we currently
have to prevent child widgets from getting events by putting
an input-only window over them. It will also be used to implement
kinetic scrolling in subsequent patches.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641836
We automatically request more motion events in behalf of
the original widget if it listens to motion hints. So
the capturing widget doesn't need to handle such
implementation details.
We are not making event capture part of the public API for 3.4,
which is why there is no ::captured-event signal.
