We already know that a widget will have literally 1 node, not more.
Avoid doing the GtkSnapshot state stack dance and just append a new
transform node instead.
Seems to give me around 400 more icons in the fishbowl
It feels slightly wrong to have GtkOrientable operate on widgets, but at
least what happens when an orientable widget changes orientation should
be part of GtkWidget.
This will allow to add more state changes without accessing widget state
from the outside of gtkwidget.c.
We expect widgets to use their own derived GtkWidgetAccessible type,
these days, and given that we hard code the default accessible type of a
GtkWidget to GtkWidgetAccessible, and that we enforce the dependency of
the type passed to gtk_widget_class_set_accessible_type(), the registry
code path is clearly unused.
The tooltip handling in GtkWidget is "special":
- the string is stored inside the qdata instead of the private
instance data
- the accessors call g_object_set() and g_object_get(), and the
logic is all inside the property implementation, instead of
being the other way around
- the getters return a copy of the string
- the setters don't really notify all the involved properties
The GtkWidgetAccessible uses the (escaped) tooltip text as a source for
the accessible object description, which means it has to store the
tooltip inside the object qdata, and update its copy at construction and
property notification time.
We can simplify this whole circus by making the tooltip properties (text
and markup) more idiomatic:
- notify all side-effect properties
- return a constant string from the getter
- if tooltip-text is set:
- store the text as is
- escape the markup and store it separately for the markup getter
- if tooltip-markup is set:
- store the markup as is
- parse the markup and store it separately for the text getter
The part of the testtooltips interactive test that checks that the
getters are doing the right thing is now part of the gtk testsuite, so
we ensure we don't regress in behaviour.
If you add a widget to a parent, this will invalidate the css nodes
for parent/siblings. Afterwards, if the parent is mapped, we will
realize the new child. This calls gtk_widget_update_alpha() which
needs the css opacity, so it revalidates the css.
Thus, for each widget_add (while visible) will trigger a full
revalidation of each sibling. If you add N children to a parent that
leads to O(N^2) revalidations.
To demo this I changed gtk-demo to always double the count
(independent of the fps) and print the time it took. Here is the
results (after a bit):
Setting fishbowl count=256 took 3,4 msec
Setting fishbowl count=512 took 10,1 msec
Setting fishbowl count=1024 took 34,1 msec
Setting fishbowl count=2048 took 126,3 msec
Setting fishbowl count=4096 took 480,3 msec
Setting fishbowl count=8192 took 1892,7 msec
Setting fishbowl count=16384 took 7751,0 msec
Setting fishbowl count=32768 took 38097,7 msec
Setting fishbowl count=65536 took 191987,7 msec
To fix this we drop gtk_widget_update_alpha() and just
calculate it when needed (which is only in a single place).
It was really only necessary because we previously set
the alpha on the surface.
With this fix the above becomes:
Setting fishbowl count=256 took 1,0 msec
Setting fishbowl count=512 took 1,9 msec
Setting fishbowl count=1024 took 3,7 msec
Setting fishbowl count=2048 took 7,4 msec
Setting fishbowl count=4096 took 18,1 msec
Setting fishbowl count=8192 took 31,0 msec
Setting fishbowl count=16384 took 66,3 msec
Setting fishbowl count=32768 took 126,7 msec
Setting fishbowl count=65536 took 244,6 msec
Setting fishbowl count=131072 took 492,2 msec
Setting fishbowl count=262144 took 984,3 msec
We require a C compiler supporting C99 now. The main purpose of
these fallbacks was for MSVC. From what I can see this is now all supported
by MSVC 2015+ anyway.
The only other change this includes is to replace isnanf() with the
(type infering) C99 isnan() macro, because MSVC doesn't provide isnanf().
It's private, no APIs, we don't talk about it. But we will start using
it very soon, so we can do size request caching in columns and avoid
sizegroups...
If you run weston with the headless backend, you get a Wayland
display with no seat, which is just fine by the protocol.
gdk_display_get_default_seat() returns NULL in this case. Various
widgets assume that we always have a seat with a keyboard and a
pointer, since that is what X guarantees. Make things survive
without that, so we can run the testsuite under a headless
Wayland compositor.
Add back a property that determines whether an individual
widget will accept focus or not. :can-focus prevents the
focus from ever entering the entire widget hierarchy
below a widget, and :focusable just determines if grabbing
the focus to the widget itself will succeed.
See #2686
This signal is mainly used for bad things, and we
don't want to emit signals during layout if we can
avoid it.
If you are subclassing, you should either use a
layout manager or override the size_allocate vfunc.
If you are using a GtkDrawingArea or GtkGLArea,
use their ::resize signals to learn about size
changes.
Fixes: #2705
