They are not usually yellow anymore, the previous advice about how to
style them was for pre-3.20 versions, and the immediate replacement (CSS
class .tooltip) does not seem ready for primetime.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=784421
Since the later gtk_style_context_add_class doesn't care about the order
of the style classes, we can as well just prepend style classes to the
list and avoid the squared behavior when appending to a linked list.
When a widget is created, its default scale is the scale of the
primary screen (for instance 2). But once parented to another widget
its scale factor should be the one of its parent (if parented to a
widget on a screen at scale factor 1, it should be 1).
The problem is that we don't emit the notify::scale-factor signal when
reparenting happens.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776821
This was meant to be silenced unless expicitly requested but
G_ENABLE_DEBUG is defined by default unless --disable-debug is passed to
configure, so use G_ENABLE_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS instead which is only
defined if --enable-debug is explicitly passed.
If somebody decides to use gtk_widget_set_double_buffered() in the
middle of a draw() then there's the risk of calling end_draw_frame()
with an invalid pointer.
Some overeager compilers may warn about the double_buffered bit field
changing values and leading to a potentially uninitialized variable.
In order to avoid compiler warnings or crashes, we can simply store the
value of the double_buffered bit field at the beginning of the rendering
and use that instead of the actual bit field.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771463
Not all occurrences of this warning can be fixed today, so put it behind
a G_ENABLE_DEBUG flag since it still shows legitimate problems even if
some of them are false positives.
It is important to know whether the returned object can or cannot
change, for a certain widget. For example to connect to the
GtkStyleContext::changed signal.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769047
Firefox does a bunch of interesting things with GTK.
If the top-level GtkWindow does not have a "csd" style class associated,
Firefox will happily draw the contents of the container used to render
HTML and XUL directly on the top level's GdkWindow; on the other hand,
if a "csd" style class is found, the MozContainer will create a new
child window, and draw on it.
Then, Firefox will proceed to disable double buffering on both the
top-level window and the MozContainer (unless they are backed by the
same GdkWindow, in which case only the top-level will be
single-buffered) *and* it will add a GDK_EXPOSURE_MASK flag to the
MozContainer events for good measure (even if this is only needed for
GTK+ 2.x).
After landing the GdkDrawingContext API in GdkWindow, GTK enabled
automatic double buffering on all top-level windows backed by a native
surface, ad most users of single buffering rely on child widgets instead
of top-levels, and we'd still like to have the same double buffering
behaviour for all top-levels on all backends. Obviously, with Firefox
disabling double buffering on the top-level window, the change broke
their drawing mechanism.
Ideally, Firefox could be fixed to not disable double buffering on the
top-level window when MozContainer has a separate GdkWindow — i.e. the
CSD case — but since we did introduce a slight change of behaviour in
fringe users of the GTK+ API, let's keep backwards compatibility with
the old code for a little while longer, and create an intermediate Cairo
context unbound from the GdkDrawingContext, like we used to do until
GTK+ 3.20.
Instead of associating the GdkWindow that created the GdkDrawingContext
we can directly bind the Cairo context to the GDK drawing context.
Cairo contexts created via gdk_cairo_create() go back to not having a
GdkWindow associated to them, like they did before we introduced the
gdk_window_begin_draw_frame() API.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766675
Instead of giving out Cairo contexts, GdkWindow should provide a
"drawing context", which can then create Cairo contexts on demand; this
allows us to future proof the API for when we're going to use a
different rendering pipeline, like OpenGL.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766675
This removes leftover code from when classes where added to the style
context.
Now that they get added directly to css nodes, the classes can exist
without a style context.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767312
When we emit ::draw, the widget should not have alloc_needed set
anymore. If this happens, it indicates a broken situation. Add a
warning to help tracking down why this might occur.
See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765410
Fix testsuite/a11y/about.ui GtkAboutDialog :
"CRITICAL **: atk_hyperlink_get_start_index: assertion 'ATK_IS_HYPERLINK (link)' failed"
That is set widget->priv->accessible as soon as accessible object is generated.
When accessible object is created accessible->priv->widget is set,
if widget->priv->accessible is not , then _gtk_label_accessible_update_links
exits early, thus without creating the links on the accessible side.
(This as it checks for the widget to have the accessible set before proceeding).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766458
GTK used to not emit GtkWidget::style-updated on widgets that weren't
realized. This sped up construction of complex widgetry in the early
days of GTK3 where we instantly invalidated on every change.
We don't do that anymore, so in theory (and in my limited testing with
widget-factory) this shouldn't be a prolem anymore.
What is a problem though is that postponing style-updated leads to 2
problems:
(1) Unrealized widgets will not emit style-updated which may cause them
to not properly update their state and return wrong values from
get_preferred_width/height() etc
(2) Emitting style-updated during realize can happen too late.
When a widget is not made child-visible by its parent (common
examples: notebook, paned) it will also not be realized when the
parent is initially shown. However, when they get realized later
(after a resize of the parent), they will emit style-updated (and
potentially queue a resize) during size-allocate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765700
This will almost certainly overwritten before the widget gets
to the screen, but while we are doing this, we might as well
use the same state that we initialize the widgets state to.